The High Court of Telangana recorded the submission by counsel that the petitioner's grievance was addressed by the officials, rendering the Writ Petition infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition accordingly without costs.
Writ Petition No. 20770 of 2020 and pending miscellaneous petitions dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e9 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION NO: 20770 OF 2020
Between:
l_(g.m!h_a!patrSeenaiah, S/o Bhikshmaiah,Aged 38 years,R/o G. Bheemanapally, Vill, P.A. Pally Mandal, Nalgonda Dt,
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under A,licle 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, drrection or a Writ, more in the nature of Writ of lMandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 and 4 in proceeding with the construction of 1) Public Park(PallePrakruthiVanam), 2) Dumping yard, and 3) Cremation Ground , in the land situated in Sy. No. 417, instead of the land in Sy. No. 396 of Bheemanapally Village, P.A. Patty Mandal, Nalgonda Dt., as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable, and opposed to all canons of justice, besides being violatrve of Fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia.
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the lircurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the pelition, the High C(rurt rray be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 2,and 4, not toproceed with the construction of 1) Public Park(Palle Prakruthi vanam), 2) Dumping Yard, anc !,) Cremation Ground. in the land situated in Sy. No. 417. instead of the lanc n Sy. No. 396 of G. Bheemanapally Village, P.A. Pally [t4andal, Nalgonda Dt. as illegal, arbitrary, pending disposal of the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M.MADHAVA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
=--7 # *t
I
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION No.2O77O OF 2O2O
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ ofMandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2and 4in proceeding with the construction of 1)public park (Palle Prakruthi Vanam) 2) Dumping Yard, and 3)Cremation ground, in the land situated in Sy.No.417, insteadof the land in Sy.No.396 of Bheemanapalyvillage,P.A.Pally Mandal, Nalgonda District, AS il1egal, arbitrarl', andrn violation of Articles 2l and 300-,\ of the Constitutionof India.
I (
t2.
!I-\FFIlffi -r-,,E!,ll
Pagc 2 of3
r.'' 1
Revenue, rarsed no objectior-r to the submissioli made bv the
learned counsel for the petitioner.
I
SDi-K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT RJfISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (e SECTION OFFICER
To,
One CC to SRI tV.IUADHAVA REDDY, Advocate. [OP JC]
2 Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the S ate of Telangana lourl 3 Two CD Copies.
o BSK TKS
HIGH COURT
DATED:1610912025
4./- t'.i.
_
,.)
( 3 1 B[l 2925
t
a'
)
Dccn 116.,
-.-,,
ORDER
WP.No.20770 of 2020
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
)<br>&>
/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition should be dismissed as infructuous after the grievance was addressed by the official respondents.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Seenaiah
The State of Telangana
The Mandal Development Office
The Tahsildar
The Gramapanchayath of G. Bheemanapally
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
