Dismissed

Smt. G.Suvarna v. The Dy. collector and Tahsildar

Telangana HC13 Feb 2025WP/19924/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition from 2009 sought mandamus to mutate the petitioners' names in revenue records for agricultural lands at Bowenpally Village. The court noted repeated absence of representation for the petitioners across several hearings and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, closing pending miscellaneous applications without costs.

What did the court decide?

None granted; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution, miscellaneous applications closed, no order as to costs.

Smt. G.Suvarna Vs The Dy. collector and Tahsildar — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³²⁵⁵ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY. THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN^KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 19924 OF 2009

¶7

Between:

¶8

't. Smt. G.Suvama, Wo. G.Nandam, aged 55 years, Occ ; House wife

¶9

Sri. G.Narottam, S/o. G.Nandam, aged^{30 years, Occ Student}

¶10

G.Kadambari, D/o. G.Nandam,^{aged 28 years, Occ Student}

¶11

G.Shiva Kameswari, D/o. G.^Nandam , aged^{23 years,} Occ Student

¶12

G.Kanchana, D/o. G.Nandam, aged^{19 years,} Occ^Student All are Rl/o. 3-4, Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad.

¶13

Rep by their GPA holders Smt. G.Vijaya^{Laxmi, W/o. G.PrasadaRao, Aged} 52 years, Occ; House wife and G-Prasada^{Rao, S/o. G.Venkata Subbaiah,} Aged 57 yrs, Occ; Bustness,^{both are FUo.H.No.1-11-200, FlatNo.306,} Ganga Kaveri Apartments,^{Shamlal Buildings. Begumpet, Hyderabad.}

¶14

.....PETITIONERS

¶15

AND

¶16

The Dy. Cotlector and Tahsildar, Balnagar^{Mandal, Ranga ReddyDistrict.}

¶17

.....RESPONDENT

¶18

Petition Under Article 226 of lhe^{Constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the HighCourt may be} pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction,^{moreparticularly onein} the nature of writ of Mandamus,^{declaringthe acts of the respondentin not} mutating the names of the^{petitionersin all the revenue records pertaining to their} agricultural lands i.e. admeasuring^{Ac.1 15-08 Gts in (Old Sy.No. 32, nowNew} Sy.No. 25 and also land admeasuring^{Ac. 57-08 gts in OldSy.No.35, now New} Sy.No. 26 situated at Bowenpally^{Village, Balanagar Mandal, RangaReddy} District as illegal, improper and^violation of^{Article 14, 16 and 21 of the} Constitution of lndia as well as^{vrolationof provisions of A.P. TelanganaArea}

¶19

Tenancy Act and consequenfly direct the respondents to mutate the names of the petitioners rn all the revenue records pertaining to the afore said lands.

¶20

t.A.NO: 10F 200 MP. NO:25 60F 09)

¶21

¶22

Petition Under Section 1S.l CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respond;nt to dispose of the representation dt. 12.O8.zolgmade by the petitioners to the respondent. I LA.NO:1 OF 201 2(WP MP.NO 30932 0F 20121

¶23

B ET\l'E E N

¶24

S_ved Ali, S/o Late Syed Mahboob, aged about 82 years, R/o H.No. I 7- | -l l9'.A^'l I , Owaisi Colony, Nerv Santhosh Nagar, Hyderabad. S;red Mahboob-ul-Hasan, S/o Syed Ali, aged about 42 years, Ro H.No.I 7- l-3 I9lNZl, Owaisi Colony, New Santhosh Nagar, Hydcrabad. Asrnath Unnisa, D/o Syed Ali, aged about 3.4 years, R-/o H.No.l7I -3 19 I A/21, Owaisi Colony, Ncrv Sanrhosh Nagar, Hyderabad. S\l Sardar Pasha, S/o Late Syed lvlahboob died per LRs.

¶25

l Syed Ibrahim Aril S/o tate SM Sardar Pasha, aged about 30 years, Il'o ['lot No. I 3, Ahlan Colony, Shrhecn \agar. Pahadi Shareef, Llr clcrabad. Svcd ! aseem Akther, S/o Late S\l Sardar Pasha, aged about 28 vears, R1o H.No. I 7- l -375lA/19, \crr Santhosh Nagar, Hyderabad. Sr e d Muqeem Anwar, S/o Late S\1 Sardar Pasha, aged about 24 , r ears. R./o H.No. l7- l-375lA/19, \crr Santhosh Nagar, Hyderabad. S.rkrena Begum. D/o Late SM Sardar Pasha, aged about 34 years, R o H.\o. I7-l-375lA/19, New Santhosh \agar, Hyderabad.

¶26

& G.

¶27

ll r) 1- i .-

¶28

Layeeqa Begum, D/o tate SM Sardar Pasha, aged about 26 years, R/o H.No.l7- l-375lA/19, Nerv Santhosh Nagar, Hyderabad. Mahmood Unnisa Begum, D/o Late Syed Mahboob since died per

¶29

.^LRs.

¶30

Syed Jawad Moinuddin, S/o Late Mahmood Unnisa Begum, aged about 55 years, R-/o H.No.8-3-45, Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad.

¶31

Mahboob Suitana, D/o Late Mahmood Unnisa Begum, aged about 60 years, R./o H.No.8-3-45, Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad.

¶32

I 1. Chand Sultan4 D/o I-ate Mahmood Unnisa Begum, aged about 57 years, R./o H.No.8-3-45, Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad.

¶33

. Siraj Sultana3 Dy'o Late Mahmood Unnisa BegUm, aged about 50 years, R/o H.No.8-3-45, Old B owenpally, Secunderabad.

¶34

Baseermnisa, D/o Late Syed Mahboob, aged about 84^yeals, R/o H.No.l8-19 (old) 8-373 (neu), Pahadi Shareef Mandal, Saroomagar, RR District.

¶35

Sayeed Unnisa, D/o Late Syed Mahboob, aged about 80^yeals, R/o H.No. i 8-8-45l/A/78, Jyothi Bagh, Eadi Bazar, Hyderabad.

¶36

I 5. Najam Unnisa, D/o Late Syeri Mahboob, aged about 75^yeals, R/o H.No.I7-l -375lA-l19, New Santhosh Nagar, Hyderabad. Syed Moinuddin, S/o Late Syed Hussain since died^per LRs.

¶37

Syeda Rahmat Unnisa, D/o Late Syed Moinuddin, aged about 60 years, R./o H.No.19-2-l l/l 16, Dargah Dopahaad Shah Wali, Misrigunj, Hyderabad.

¶38

¶39

t7	SyedaRalathSultana,D/oLate SyedVloinuddin,agedabout56 yeals,R,/oH.No.l9-2-I1/l16, Dargah DopahaadShahWali, Misrigunj,Hyderabad.
I8	Syeda Shahjahan,D/o LateSyed Moinuddin,agedabout54^years, R/oH.No.l9-2-Il/l15/B, Dargah DopalmadShahWali, Misrigunj, Hl,derabad.
I9	SyedaAminaZehra,D/oLate S-v-ed,{oinuddin,agedabout52 I^{ears,R/oH.No.19-2-18/D/15/A,} Dargah DopahaadShahWali, N'[isrigun^j,Hyderabad.
20	Sl edaIIalimaSadia,D/oLate Slcd\loinuddin,aged about44 vear.s,Rlo Il.No.8-3-375ll,YElla Iteddyguda, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.
ll	Sycda.-veshaHumera,Dlo Late Syeil\lcinuddin,agedabout42 rerrs.[{,ofI.No.l9-2-lll115/B, DrlgrirDopahaadShahWali, [isrigLrn.j.Hvderabad.
	SreJ\l.r.ldoorn.SloSyed Hussain ,.1icdper[-r,rs	E: B'
	Satt.1.rIlegunr, W/oLateSyed \llrqdoi-rnr,agedabout70^years, l(,'II,,.:0.(,-13l.Shakl<arGunj, I lytlci,rb;Ld.
l	SyedSi.ldique,Sio LateSyed \1,,:r'rL:'r,-r.r..rcedabout56 years. li.o H\o.lll-175,New \IellcprLIly,Hyderabad. .\hmcdiBegum,D/o LateSyed IlLrssuirsincedied per LRs.
1.1	\orrs'rt'rrrrtr'atsegtrm.D/o Late .\hnr..i.ltcgurn.agedabout58 ycars.Il.ot{.No.I8-l2- 1t9C.lIEl,[1afez BabaNagar, llrdelrbld.

¶40

l3 \

¶41

25 Mahboob Unnisa Begum, D/o Late Ahmedi Begum, aged about 52 years, R-/o H.No. I6-2-493, Palton No.3, Malakpet, Hyderabad.

¶42

26 Raheem Unnisa Begum, D/o Late Ahmedi Begum, aged about 53 years, R/o H.No. I 8-12-4 19/C, Halez Baba Nagar, Hyderabad.

¶43

21 Sogra Begum, D/o Late Ahmedi Begum, aged about 5l years, R/o H.No. I 8- I 2-4 l8/B I l0 / 45, Hafez Baba Nagar, Hyderabad.

¶44

28 Kareem Unnisa Begum, D/o Late Ahmedi Begum, ag;d about 44 years, R/o H.No.l6-2-463, Palton No.3, Malakpet, Hyderabad.

¶45

29 Shameem Unnisa Begum, D/o Late Ahmedi Begum, aged about 50 years, R/o H.No;18-12418/B/lO/45, Hafez Baba Nagar, Hyderabad. ^

¶46

Akber Hussain, S/o Late Hussaini Begum since died per LRs.

¶47

i0. Ashraf Unnisa, Wo Late Akbar Hussain, aged about 50 years, R/o H.No. t 9-4-218lB/28, Nqwab Sahab Kunta, Hyderabad.

¶48

il lrfan Hussain, S/o Late Akbar Hussain, aged about 28 years, R-/o H.No. t 9-4-218lB/28, Nawab Sahab Kunta, Hyderabad.

¶49

-) Rizwan Hussain, S/o Late Akbar Hussain, aged about 2l years, R/o H.No. I9-4-218lB/28, Nawab Sahab Kunta, Hyderabad.

¶50

J,) lmran Hussain, S/o Late Akbar Hussain, aged about 21 years, R/o H.No. l9-4-2 I 8/B/28, Nawab Sahab Kunta, Hyderabad.

¶51

j.r Hannan Hussain, S/o Late Akbar l-lussain, aged about l9 years, R/o H.No. I 9-4-2 1818/28, Nawab Sahab Kunta, Hyderabad.

35	MasarrathJahan.D/o1-ateAl<bar Hussain,aged about 24^years,R/o H.No.l9-4-2t8/ts/28,Narvab SahabKunta,Hyderabad.
36	NusrathJahan,DoLareAkbar Hussain,aged about22^years,R/o H.No.l9-4-2I8,ts128,Narvab SahabKunra, Hyderabad.
37	IshrathJahan,D/oLateAkbar Hussain,agedabout20 years,R/o H.No.I9-,1-2I8/8/28,Nawab SahabKunta,H1'derabad.
38	Maharnmed Hussain^(lqbal),S/o Late HussainiBegurn,agedabout 44 veals,tuoH.No. I9-2-I8/8/46, AmjadDaula Ba3h. Hyderabad.
39	HajeruBegurrr.DoLate Hussaini Begum. agcd about60^years,R/o Il.No.l0-6-l87.SyedAli Chabutrl,Hr dcrabad.
4U	Hriire, riiesrrn.U oLrtiilussaini Begurn.agedahout-58years,R-/o H.No19--.1-,i38,..'1. GhaziBanda, Hvderebrd.
4t	.\firrB.':rrrrr.DuL.rtcllussaini Begtrnr.eredaboLrti51,ears,R/o t{.\ol0-l-67.\l.Cround Floor, PloL\Lri,[{unialLrrNaglr, IIr'tlcrILL-.ad.	tl @
42	1-:rirccle LJegunr.DoLlteHussatnt llc,qurn.l.tccirLbtrrrLJf.r'cars,R/o H.No.IIS'617 I.Clharlchalguda, Hy,deLr bad.
	.\rrc.'sll.,-rr	r.D^(,LJle llussaini BegrrnrsincccliedpcrLRs.
13	Sy'cdSadiq.S,o..\nees Begutn, agcdahoLLt1iI'ears. R,oMIGH5l B.Sanrlr,.rslr\agrLr.^II1'dcrabad.
4,1	1'[email protected]'[rrim.rrnaNazeer, D,'o[,rte \alcesl3rgurn.aged aboLrtI^jyeals.l{o\ttGH 5lB, Santho:hNacar.Ih,tlerahad.

4i9"-

()/4

The petitione! s No. I , 3 to 22 and 24 to 44 are rep.by their GP.A holders petitioners No.2 & 23 i.e., Syed Mahboob-Ul-Hasan, S/o Syed Ali, aged abo,rt 42 years, R-/o H.No. I7- i -3 I 9/A/21 , Owaisi Colony, New Santhosh Nagar, Hyderabad. Syed Siddique, S/o Late Syed Moin Uddin, aged about 56 years, PJo H.No.l I -3- l 75, New Mallepally, I Iyderabad. . . ... Petitioners / Proposed Respondents No.2 ro 4; AND Srnt. G.Suvama, Wo G.Nandam, agcd about 55 years, Occ: Housewife, IUo i -.1, Old Bowenpally, Secundelabad. Sri G.Narottam, S/o G.Nandam, aged about 30 1'ears, Occ: Student, R/o 3-4, Okl Borvenpally, Secunderabad. ) G.Kadambari, D/o G.Nandam, aged about 28 vears, Occ: Student, R/o 3-4, OId Bo''venpal Iy, Secunderabad. -l Ci. Sh iva Kameswari, EF I)/o G.Nandam, aged abOut 23 years, Oec: Student, R/o 3-4, Old Borvenpally, Secunderabad. (i. Kanchana, D/o G.Nandam, aged .ibout l9 1'ears, Occ: Student, R/o 3-4, ( )ltl Borvenpally, Secunderabad. .l{cp.b1'^{their GPAholder} Snrt. G.Vijaya Laxmi, Wo G.Prasada l{.r,'. aged about 52 years, Occ: I loLrseu i t-e and G.Prasada Rao, S/o G.^'enkara Subbaiah, aged about 57 y c:rrs. Occ: Business, both are R-/o Il.No. l- I 1-200, Flat No.306, Ganga Kfl\ eri Apartmerrts, Shamlal B tr ildings, Begumpet, Hydelabad.

¶60

... Responden ts Petitioners No. I to 5

¶61

	l(,
6 7	1'heDy. Collector^{&Tahasildar'.} BaluagarMandal,^{ItR Distrrct} SyedAmeer^{Uddin.S/o LateS)'ed} MoinUddin,^{agedabout6lI ears'} R/oH.No.I9-2-l^lrll5/A' Dopahad Shah^{\/ali, Misriguni'} Hyderabad.	Respondent/ RespondentNo.1
8	SyedNajamUddin,^{Sio LateS1'ed} MoinUddin.^agedabout50l^ears. fuo H.-\o.20-5-l3^r,QaziPLrr.r. ShahAliBanda,^IJYderabad.
9 l0	SyedMazher^{Uddin,S/o [.atc} SyedMoinUddin.^{aged about-17} years,fuo H.No.l0-5-lⁱi, Qazipura.^{Shahr\lrBantla.} Hyderabad. SyedYousulUddin,^S,oLateS1'ed Hussain. agcd^{abotrt80. cars,} r.l Tat: \t,,,.,.1 l\rr,I1..\u,^I Nagar,Nlelitliparnltn.^{Hr rie,abircl.}	.Respondents^/Proposed RespondentsNo.46^{to 49}

¶62

Petition Under Section^{151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit^{ftledin support oF the petrtion,the High Court may be pleasedto} implead the^{petitioners / proposed respondenlsas respondents No 2 to 45&} proposed respondents^{No Z to 10 as respondentsNo 46 to 49 in w P'No 19924} of 2009.

¶63

Counsel for the^{Petitioners: SRI C'HANUMANTHARAO}

¶64

Counsel for^{the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE}

¶65

Counsel for the^{Proposed Respondents:SRI S'A'JAWEED ZAMA}

¶66

The Court made^{the following OROER}

¶67

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioners / proposed respondents as respondents No.2 to 45 & proposed respondents No.7 to 10 as respondents No.46 to 49 in W.p.No.19924 of 2009.

¶68

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI C.HANUMANTHA RAO

¶69

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR REVENUE

¶70

Counsel for the Proposed Respondents : SRI S.A.JAWEED ZAMA

¶71

The Court made the following ORDER

¶72

I ,

¶73

HONOURABLE^SRI JUSTICE^{N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR}

¶74

WRIT PETITION^{No.199240F2009}

¶75

ORDER:

¶76

Today when the matter^{has been taken up for hearing,} it has been^{observedthat on 18.02.2023, there was no} representation on^{behalf of the petitioners' Again on} 20.72.2023, there^{was no representation on behalfof the} petitioners, even after listing^{the matterunder caption"for} dismissal". Thereafter^{on 03.04.2024, 04.12'2024 also,} there was no representation^{on behalf of the petitioners'} Today, also there is^{no representationon behalf of the} petitioners.

¶77

As the matter^{pertains to the year 2009 and there is no} representation on behalf^{of the petitioners,it appearsthat} the^petitioners are^{not interested in prosecutingthe matter'} Therefore, this Court^{has no option except to dismiss this} writ^petition.

¶78

In view of the^{above, this writ petition is dismissedfor} non-prosecution.

I i i I i i

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand

¶83

closed. No order as to costs.

¶84

SD/-V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

¶85

I I I

¶86

! I I ! ! ! I I

¶87

v, SECTION OFFICER .,'

¶88

¶89

The Deputy Collector and Tahsildar, Balnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2. One CC to SRI C.HANUIvIANTHA RAO, Advocate TOPUCI

¶90

Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶91

One CC to SRI S.A.JAWEED ZAMA, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies

SA GJF

i ) I I! , i i I i I I I I I i I I J I i I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:1310212025

ORDER

WP.No.19924 of 2009

R 1HE S lt
t
C) r
1 7 JUL 2025
(,)
'

^ATCH

¶101

DISMISSING THE W.P

¶102

FOR NON - PROSECUTION

¶103

WITHOUT COSTS.

¶104

?-n-
25
7.O

Smt. G.Suvarna v. The Dy. collector and Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. G.Suvarna v. The Dy. collector and Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Zakiya Begum, Vs The State of Telangana

Zakiya Begum Vs The State of Telangana

Muvva Ram Prasad Vs The State of Telangana

Mounika Bandapelli Vs The State of Telangana

K.S. Swamy, Vs Govt. of A.P.

M. Rama Krishna Vs The State of Telangana