Dismissed¶¶30

M.a.Rasheed v. The Commissioner of Police and 03 Others

Telangana HC9 Sept 2025WP/19837/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court; W.P. No.19837 of 2022; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs; petitioner I.A.Rasheed, Police Constable; prayer for mandamus on non-consideration for promotion as Head Constable; charge memo suspended by erstwhile A.P.A.T. in O.A.No.4451/2014 (WP (TR) No.251/2017); Articles 226, 14, 16 and 21 invoked; IA No.1 of 2022 under s.151 CPC (as OCR-printed 'Section 15 j CpC'); counsel R. Rajasekhar Rao; GP FOR HOME for respondents; Mrs Justice Surepalli Nanda; 09 September 2025; withdrawal before adjudication; no cases cited.

What the court decided

AI extract

M.a.Rasheed Vs The Commissioner of Police and 03… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

132s21

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF^{SEPTEI\i,IBER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE^{SUREPALLI NANDA}

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 19837^{0F 2022}

¶7

Between:

¶8

lr/.A.Rasheed, S/o. Late M.A.Raheem,^{Aged about 47 years,Police} Constabte-6257, Police Station,^{Santhoshnagar, Hyderabad'}

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The Commissioner of^{Police, Hyderabad City, Hyderabad.}

¶12

2 The Deputy lnspector General^{of Police, Zone-Vl, Charminar, Hyderabad'}

¶13

J The Director General of^{Police, Telangana State,Hyderabad.}

¶14

4 The State of Telangana,^{Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home Department,} Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226^{of the constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in^{the affidavit filed therewith,the High courtmaybe} pleased to issue a writ more in the nature^{of writ of N4andamus or any otherwrit} order or direction, to declare^{the actionof the Respondents in not considering the} case of the Petitioner for^{promotionas Head Constable, thoughthe charge} memo is already suspended by the^{erstwhile Hon'ble A.P.A'T in} o.A.No.4451/2014^{(WP (TR) No.251l2O17)as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional} and void being violative of Arts.14,^{16 and 21 of the constitutionof lndia and} consequently direct the respondent^{to considerthe case of the petitioner for} promotion as Head Constable with all consequential^benefits.

I I I i l

IA NO: 10F 2022

petition under Section 15 j CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondents t Head Constable in one ol^{"onr,Ou,the caseof the petitionerfor promotion} as n,. senioritv and erisibirity keepins in view ", ,,.," "ill,]'lT.'""iiil?;,,;ru, wP (rr) 2s14/2017 dated 2s/o7t2o14pendins disposar "r,n"orl)"",i,i'rlriri!;

¶21

Counsel for the petitioner: SRI R.RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶22

Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR HOME

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶24

¶25

¶26

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE^{SUREPALLI NANDA}

¶27

w PETITI ON No.19⁸³⁷ of o22

¶28

ORD ER:

¶29

Sri R.Rajasekhar^{Rao, the learned counsel appearingon} behalfofthepetitionerseeksleaveofthisCourtforwithdrawal of the^present writ Petition.

¶30

. Considering the said^{subnrissionmade by the learned} counsel on^{record appearingon behalf of the petitioner and duly} bringing the said^{submissionon record, the Writ Petitionis} dismlssed as^{withdrawn. There shallbe no orderas to costs'}

¶31

The misceilaneous^{applicat:ons,if anypenciing,shall stand}

¶32

closed.

¶33

SD/. V.HARI^PRASAD EPUTY REGISTRAR

¶34

//TRUE COPY//

¶35

SECTION OFFICER

¶36

To,