Disposed

Mr. Jayaprakash Reddy Parvathareddy v. Income Tax Officer

Telangana HC4 Aug 2025WP/19544/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition sought direction to process a manual income tax refund application arising from a consequential order determining tax refundable. Accepting the Department's offer to complete manual processing within four weeks, the Court disposed of the petition, directing refund within four weeks with applicable interest and no costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

Mr. Jayaprakash Reddy Parvathareddy Vs Income Tax Officer — Income Tax | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^348e ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 1954 40F 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Mr. Jayaprakash Reddy Parvathareddy, Legal Heir of late Smt. p. Giriia Red dy.7-1-21419, Dharim Karam Road. hme"erpet, HyOerrOra-SOO Of b.-"''"

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

lnccme Tax Officer, Ward 6(.1), Hyderabad

¶12

State Bank lndia, rep. by its General A,4anager, Nodal Officer for lncome Tax Refunds. Hyderabad, T6langana.

¶13

3 Central Processing Center, 1st Floor, prestioe Alpha No 48 1 4g 2. Beratenaagrahara Begur, Hosur Rd, Uttarahalli Hobli. Bangalore.

¶14

4 Principal Chief Commissioner of lT (Ap and Telangana),, 1Oth Floor, C_Block, lncome Tax Towers. AC Guards, Hyderabad, Tela"ngana.

¶15

5 Union of lndia, rep. by its Secretary Ministry of Finance, Jeevan Deep _ts^u^{jlgjl'rS. 3rd Floor, Sansad Marg, New Dei .10 001 . rep.} by^its Comniissioner (GSr).

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction, directing the Respondents to forthwith refund the principal amount of Rs.2,14,23,787l- as determined by the 1st Respondent in his consequential order dated 22.5.2024 as a consequence of the judgment dared 4.4.2024 passed by this Honorable court in lrrA No.352 of 20'12 by processing the petitioner,s manual refund application dated 09.06.2025 filed under the lnstructions No..1 1 of lnstructions dated 18.6.201g issued by the Directorate of lncome Tax (system).

¶18

lA NO: 1 oF²⁰²⁵

¶19

Petition under^{Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances statedin} the affidavit^{filed in supportof the petition' the High Court may be pleased to} direct the^{Respondentsto processthe Petitionersmanual refund application} dared 9t6t2o25within^{a period of one week, pendingdisposar of the writ Petition'} as otherwise^{the Petitionerwill be put to severe loss and hardship'}

¶20

Gounsel^{for the Petitioner: SRI TARUNCHADHA'rep"SRI S'VIJAY ADITHYA} CounselfortheRespondents:Ms.B.SAPNAREDDY,ST.SGfoTITDEPT The Court^{made the following:ORDER}

.-::1.^t-?f i.'r

i l I

I I i )-

THE HONOL*ABLE^{SRI JUSTICE P.SAMKOSHY} AND THFSONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE} SI,,6DALA CHALAPATHI^RAO

¶26

W.P. No.^{t9544oF 2025}

¶27

gRDEB' (per Iton'hte^Sri 'lttstice^{P'Sam Koshv)}

¶28

Heard Mr.^{TarunChadha,learned counselreprescnttng} Mr. S.Vijay^{Adirhya,leamed counsel for the petitionerand perused} the record.

¶29

The limited^{relief the petitionerhas soughtfor in the present} writ petition^{is lor an appropriate direction to the respondentsto} immediately^{process the manual refund application of the petitioner} arising out^{of the consequential order passed by respondent} No. I on^{22.05.2024, whereinthe totaltax refundable was lbund to} be^{Pts.2,14,23,7871-.}

¶30

Learned Standing^{Counsel for the lncome Tax l)epartment} submits that^{the Department may be permitted to process the claim} for refund^{and thesameshall be conciudedwithin an outer limit of} four^{(04)weeks,as the processing has to be donemanually'}

I tI i I

I I \ I

re.\

Considering the submission^tnade by^{the leamedStanding}

¶37

Counsel. rvt: do not intend to keep^the writ^{petition pendingany} further

¶38

Thc r,,,rit petition is accordingly disposed of. The respondents are directed to lorthrvith process the refund clairn of the^petitioner manually and necessary steps be taken for the amount of^refundto be credited to the account of the petitioner within a^{period of four} (04) weeks ;tarling fiorn today.'fhe petitioner would be entitled for interest as applicable under law. l-here shall be no order^{as to} c osts.

¶39

Cons,:quently, miscellaneous petitions^pending, if any,^shall

¶40

stand closecl

¶41

SD/- M. JAWAHAR^REDDY TANT REGISTRAR

¶42

//TRUE COPY//

¶43

<br>it ECTION OFFICER
I
I

¶44

To,

¶45

The lncome Tax Officer,^{Ward 6(1), Hyderabad}

¶46

The General^{tvlanager,State Bank lndia, Nodal Officer for lncomeTax} Refunds. HYderabad,^Telangana.

¶47

The Central Processing Center,^{'lst Floor' Prestige Alpha No 48 1 48 2'} Beratenaagrahara Beg-ur, Hosur Rd,^{Uttarahalli Hobli. Bangalore.}

¶48

The Principal Chief Commissioner of lT (AP and Telangana),,^1Oth Floor, C- Block, lncome Tax Towers. AC Guards, Hyderabad, Telangana.

¶49

The Commissioner (GST), Union of lndia, rep. by^its Secretary,^Ministryof Finance, Jeevan Deep Building. 3rd Floor, Sansad^{[,4arg,New De1 '10 001.}

¶50

One CC to^lSRl S.VIJAY ADITHYA^Advocate [OPUC]

¶51

¶52

7 One CC to Ms.B.SAPNA REDDY, SC for lncome Tax Department. IOPUC] B. Two CD Copies

¶53

¶54

r PVL

¶55

HIGH COURT

¶56

DATED:0410812025

¶57

_r:- ' ,- -, -' ....:]<br>2O SEP M

¶58

ORDER

¶59

WP.No.19544^o12025

¶60

DISPOSING^{OF THE WRIT PETITION} WITHOUT^COSTS

¶61

'/A
4/1
?/4 )

Mr. Jayaprakash Reddy Parvathareddy v. Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Mr. Jayaprakash Reddy Parvathareddy v. Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Aruna L/R of M. Sridhar, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabd

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Vs Myadam Kishan Rao Charitable Trust

M/S. Jaiprakash Gayatri Projects Ltd. (Jv) Vs the Commissioner of Central Excise