Disposed

Pilli Bhaskar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC24 Jan 2025WP/1919/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Residents claiming house plots under a weaker-section/family-planning beneficiary scheme alleged interference with their plots and sought consideration of their representation. The court directed that they not be dispossessed except by due process of law.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed not to dispossess petitioners from their respective plots without following due process of law; no costs.

Pilli Bhaskar Vs The State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^32s6 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

FRIDAY, THE TWENry FOURTH^{DAY OF JANUARY} TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENTYFIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{C.V. BHASKARREDDY}

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 1919^{0F 2025}

¶8

Between:

¶9

Pilli Bhaskar, S/o^{Late Pilli Prasad,Aged64 years, Occ Pvt Service,.Rl/o}

¶10

H.r.ro. it-soil, Mallegudem,^{JawaharnZgar, NdarBus stop, Shamirpet, Nisa} Hakimpet, Medchal^{Malkalqiri Diskict}

¶11

z. koiii'j ltiiesn, Slo tlarsaiii,^{Aged 36 years, occ- Pvt Services,No 24-1482'} - nrtjnatrait'i Nagar Cotony, Neai Gandhi Statue' Jawaharnagar, Shameerpet, Ranga Reddy District.

¶12

s. ija;iio, Fiififrurim, slo^{PentaiahAsed52} vears,^{occ. Pvt' Services' No24-} - TSO6, nrundhattti tttagrt, Jawahar -Nagar,^-Balaji Nagar, Shamirpet, Ranga Reddy District.

¶13

- fr/|oniinmed Abid Khan, S/o^{MohammedUmed Khan, Aged aboul 40 years'} OJc.-Fvt. Servlc",^{R/o Arundathi Nagar' Shamirpet Mandal, Jawaharnagar,} Ranga Reddy District.District.

¶14

Ranga Reddy District.District.

¶15

s. ijirri Bnaiiiilslo t_at.^{pifii prasad Aged52 years,Occ._pvt.services,pJo21-} - brj,' MurrrsJ'aim, .ra*aiiri;;s;i E;|"J, t(agar, rueir Ambedkar statue, Shameerpet, Ranga^{ReddY District}

¶16

a eliiJuiam Dova Srinivas,-s/o^{Burappa,Aged40 years,occ.-Pvtservices,} Rl/o'H.No. 24438, Arundathi^{Nagar Kapra' Jawaharnagar,JJ Nagaruolony'} Medchal Malkajgiri District.

¶17

z.^(otni Aiav. Slo"fotna^{Narsaiah, Aged44 years,Occ Pvt' Services,Wo 24-} ' b5i, nril"litrilri Nlagar, Near Ganlhi staiue, Jawaharnagar, Balaji Nagar' Shameerpet, Ranga^{ReddY District.}

¶18

e Kr;oilii'tr,tittestr-Madiqi, S/o^{K.Chandraiah,Aged 47 yearc,occPvt'} Services, No 24-15t1,-^{Arundathi Nagar,Balaji Nagar,Jawaharnagar,Jl} Nagar Colony. Ranga^{Reddy District-}

¶19

s. M.f,iienaar.'Slo tr,t--Valtjiitr,^{nqea 38 years,Occ. Pvt' Services, No24-617'} - 6iiF- C;l"nv,- Neri Gort n"ign School, Jawahar Nagar, Balaji Nagar' Shameerpet, Ranga Reddv^District.

¶20

10 iii;J;;;fid" rnir,ipatni, Sio^{Bhumaiah,Aged 44 years, occ'.Pvt Service' Rl/o} '- H.li;:"44t- niurioiiti Nagar, Kapra' -Jawahdrnagar, JJ Nagar Colony' Medchal Malkajgiri^District.

¶21

f f .kb-tna frliaifeshl$lo^{fottraNarsaiah,Aged50years, Occ. Pvt. Servies,Rl/o 1-} 132, Arundathi^{Nagar, Kapra,Jawaharnagar, JJ NagarColony' Meocnal} Malkajgiri District.

¶22

Malkajgiri District.

¶23

fZ.bnimb"ntnula^{Ramchand, S/o Ch.Bheemaiah, Aged 3J. years,.Ogg} 14 Service, Rl/o H.No.^{24-1494,. ArundathiNagar' ShamlrpetManoal'} Jawaharnaoar. Ranqa Reddy^District'

¶24

r '- s i;;il;rlxaina;]i![ AtoT_ilt+tO, Saraswathi Colony, slJ^{o,iananandham Aged 69} Uppat, Hyri'erabad, vears, Ranga-Reddy^occ' .Unemplovee'District^.

¶25

r+ k.naiu. S/o Late uanumanitru,'Aged⁺⁵ iears,^{occ' Pvt' Services, Rlo24-} ' ' b8rii6: Airnoiini Nigir, Near Yelamma iemple, Balali Nagar, Shameerpet' Ranga ReddY District

¶26

...PET|T|ONERS

¶27

AND

¶28

'1. The State of -felangana,

¶29

8."p.^{, Oy its principal Secretary, Revenue}

¶30

^^{pepflrment, llecreiariai, Hv'aeri6i'i'} 2. The District Collector, Uedcnat Mal[a;oiri District.

¶31

The Revenue Divisionar officer. reeil"ia orision, Medchar Markaiqiri Diskict. 4 The M u nicipa t.Com.m.issio ne r, Lawi r,, r * Jg;; M; hi;Gi'6;;;;tifr;,' ffi;.i, _^{Mandal, Medchal MalkajgiriDistrict. '-}

¶32

The Commissioner, HtrlDR, Ameerpet. Hvderabad.

¶33

6 The Tahsitdar, Kapra Mancjat, ttetft'r'r fvirriligiri District

¶34

,..RESPONDENTS

¶35

.Petition^{under Article226 Of lhe Constitutionof lndia praying} that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a rvrit, order or.Direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, c;uestioning the action of Respondents No. 2 to 6 in interfering with the petitioners house site prots, who are the beneficiaries under the rndira Avas Yojana schemr: and arso under weaker section and who opted for the famiry planning operation during the year'199g-99, situated at Arundhati Nagar Kutumba Niyantrana operation Labdidarura samkshema sangham, Jawaharnagar Vi age, Keesar Division, Ka'ra Mandal, Medchal Malakajgiri District, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principres; of naturar justice and consequenfly direct the respondents No. 2 to 6, to consider the representation dated 20 11 2024 in the interest of justice.

¶36

lA NO: 1 oF 2025

¶37

Petition under isection 15'r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents No. 2 to 6, to consider the representation dated 20.11.2024, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶38

Counsel for the Petitioners: M/s K.ANNAPURNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 3, 6: Cp fOi REVENUE counser for the Respondent No.4: snt (ntsHrua nEDDy p, sc FOR MpcL counsel for the Respondent No.S: sRr v.NARsrMne couo, sc FoR HMDA

¶39

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶40

¶41

THE HON,BLE^{SRI JUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY}

¶42

I t

¶43

) t

¶44

UIRIT PETITION NO^.1919of2o25

¶45

ORDER:

¶46

This Writ Petition^{is filed with the following relief:}

¶47

"-.-to issue^{a Wit, Ord'er or Drection more particularlgone in the} iiri tf Wit of Mandamus, Elestioning^{the action of} i""ponaint"^{No.2io 6 in interkrtng withthe p?titi?n:lsl'r;use} iti pto*,^{lu)hoare tleben;ficio:ies uru7erthe IndiraAuo's} ii1"i" sin" "^{andalso under weakersection andtoho opted} iii-ti t"^itU^{planningoperotion duing tle gear 1998-99'} 'iituot"a- ot irundhati Nogqr Kufitmba Nigontrana Operotion -t oliiao*t" Somksfr;ma^{Sangham, Jauahamagar} .^Village' iesar Dtvision,^{Kapra Mandat, Medchd-Malakajgtn Distnct' o's} lit ii iirr"ru,^{iotottu"of pinciptes} ?f^{noluraliustice and} coiseouentlu diect^{the ,"tpoidt'tt No'2 to 6' to considertlle} ,""ri!iit"ri." dqted^{20.11.2024in the interestoJ Ttsticeand to} p-i"" sr.h other^{otd.eror orders as the Hon'ble Court mog deem} -fit and proper in the circumstances oJ the cose"

¶48

Considered^{the submissions of the learned counsel for the} parties and with^{their consent this writ petition is disposed of at} the admission^stage

¶49

It is stated^{that the petitioners are residents and members} of the Arundhati^{Nagar Kutumba NiyantranaOperation} Labdidarula^{Samkshema Sangham, registeredunderNo 731 / 1-2-} 2O01, situated^{at JawaharnagarVillage, Keesar Division' Kapra} Mandal, Medchal^{Malkajgiri District' It is furtherstated that'} after conducting^{a socio-economicsurvey' the membersof the} association^{wereidendfled for the allotment of varioushouse} plots in Survey^{Nos.706to 758, 761 to 77O' ar,.d 971 to 977'} situatedatJawaharNagar,ShameerpetMandal'RangaReddy

¶50

CVBR, J w p_7979_2025

¶51

¶52

District. It is also stated that, after an inquiry, HUDA. being the competent rluthorit5r, sent the layou t for approvzrl to the Government. It is further stated that the petitioners are in occupation of smal1 extents of house plots, and through their hard-earned money, they have constructed dwetling unjts and are paying houst: assessment tax to tJ.e respondent local authorities, who have also laid the roads and therefore, they are enioying the property as absolute owners.

¶53

This Court, without going into the petitioners right or entitlement to the allotment of house sites or the due process .foliowed in^1,he construction of their houses, is of the oprnioi that the ends of justice would be met if the responclents arc directed not to dispossess the petitioners from their respectrve plots, without follou,ing due process of law.

¶54

5 With l-he above observations, the writ perition is disposed

¶55

of. There sha[ be no order as to costs

¶56

As a sr:c1uel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any. pending

¶57

shal1 stand ckrsed.

¶58

SD/- A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶59

A \ //TRUE COPYII tECTION OFFICER

¶60

¶61

The Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

¶62

The District Collector, Medchal Malkaiqiri District.

¶63

The Revenue Divisional.Officer, Kees;ra Division, Medchal Matkajgiri District 4. The Municipal C;ommissioner, Jawahar Nagar Municipat Corporati6"n, XapiJMandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

¶64

The Commissioner, HMDA, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

¶65

The Tahsildar, Flapra Mandal, Medbhal Malkajgiri District

¶66

¶67

One CC to M/s. K.ANNAPURNA REDDY,^Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court^{for the Stateof Telangana, at} Hyderabad. [OUT] 9. Ohe CC to SRI KRISHNA REDDY P, SC^FORMPCL [OPUC] 10.One CC to V.NARSIMHA GOUD, SC FOR^HMDA [OPUC] '1 1 . Two CD Copies PSK. \r

I I

\ I

HIGH COURT

DATED:2410112025

ORDER

WP.No.1919 of 2025

/./ . i r1! ji.:i :-:.- ,. '. -<br>l'
,,,/,,
i: .<-
f'
1 ,.)
;
l- 1il I:rts .T25
^ , cla *..y'
17

¶75

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶76

8'A\ \s

Pilli Bhaskar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pilli Bhaskar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.M. Jayalaxmi Vs The State of Telangana

Gurram Sandhya Rani Vs The State of Telangana

Sabavath Devram Vs The state of Telangana

Smt. Chittaboyana Laxmi Vs Sri. Mahinder Reddy

Pankaj Gupta Vs The State of Telangana

Aenugu Bal Reddy and 10 others Vs suraj kumar