Petitioners challenged non-deposit of compensation lands acquisition order. Court directed Special Deputy Collector to deposit decreetal amount within six weeks from receipt.
Directed Special Deputy Collector (LA) to deposit the decreetal amount to the credit of LAOP No. 24 of 2014 within six weeks from the date of receipt of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t325s I
rN rHEHrGH couTfSgrtffotJst=oFTELANGANA
(SPeciiioriginal Jurisdiction;
THURSDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OFA-UGUST '''"''"TWo iHousAND AND TWENTYFlvE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE N'V'SHRAVAN KUMAR
wRlTPETITION NO: 19040 0F2025
Between:
.....PETITIONERS
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
PetitionUnderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith' the High Court maybe pleased to issuean appropriate writ' order or direction more particularlyone in the natureof Writ of Mandamus declaringthe actionof the Respondentsin not depositingcompensation amounts to the Petitioners as per Order and Decreeof The SeniorCivil Judge, at Narayanpetin LAOPNo'24 of 2014 daled1B'O1'2023' as arbitrary,illegaland in violation of Article 300-Aof the Constitutionof lndia and consequentlydirect the Respondents No lto 4 hereinto depositthe decreetal
amounts to the credit of LAop No.24/2014, on the fire of the court of rhe Senior Civil Judge, at Narayanpet.
I.A.NO:1 OF 2025
petition Under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the writ petition, the High court may be preased to issue interim directions, directing the Respondents No.1 to 4 herein to deposit the decreetar amount due to the petitioners herein in pursuance of the order and Decree of rhe Senior civil Judge, at Narayanpet in LAop No. 24 of 2014 dated 1810112023 forthwith, pending disposal of writ petition.
Counsel for the petitioners : SRI N.PRAVEEN REDDY
3:i1.,_"#.Jll,"rRespondentNo.1 : Gp FoR tRRt AND coMM AREA
Counset for the Respondent No.2 : G.p FOR FINANCE AND pLANNING Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : G.p FOR LAND ACeUtSITION The Court made the following ORDER
fH€ HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE N'V'SHRAVAN KUMAR WritPetition No.1904()of 2025
oRDER:
This writ Petitionis filed todeclaretheaction of respondentsin not depositingthe compensationamounts to the petitionersas per order and decree of the SeniorCivil Judge' Narayanpetin LAOP No'24 of 2Ol4 daLed l8'Ol'2023'
I_
..",
of order and decree in LAOp No.24 of 20 14 dated 1g.O1.2023 subject to deposit of SO%, of the decreetal amount within g weeks. However, till date respondent authorities have not complied with the orders of this Court. euestioning the said inaction of the respondents, the present writ petition is filed.
::3::
the submissionsoflearned Assistant 4. Recording
GovernmentPleaderfor Land Acquisition'this writ petition is disposedof with a directionto respondent No'4/SpecialDeputy Collector(LA) to follow their own time line and depositthe decreetalamount to the credit of LAOP'No'24of 2Ot4 within a period ofsix (6) weeksfrom the date of receiptof a copy of this order.
Miscellaneouspetitions,ifanY, Pendinginthis writ
petitionshall stand closed'No costs'
SD/.L. VIJAYA LAXMI S STANTREGIS
,/TRUECOPY//
ECTIONOFFICER
To
SA PVL
HIGH COURT
DATED:14 tOBt2OZs
,.---::--.:--<br>--'. --.'t,:.\F. S ,. -..-
":-.<br>t',i
1 .'. <br>20 Sl:P zffi
l1 .. ,/
,7
_/
ORDER
WP.No.19040 of 2O2S
DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondents failed to deposit compensation amounts as per the court decree?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajiv Kulkarni & Ors.
Government of Telangana,_represented_by_its_principalsecretary_(Finance_Department)
District Collector, Narayanpet
Special Deputy Collector (LA), RLISP Unit - I, Makthal
Shravan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
