W.P. No. 18895 of 2025 (High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad - Special Original Jurisdiction), disposed of at admission on 03-07-2025 by Justice K. Sarath with the consent of both sides. The Sub Registrar, Quthbullapur (Respondent No.3) had refused, by Intimation of Refusal No.17/2023 dated 20-05-2023, to register and release pending Document No.P113/2023 dated 18-05-2023 (certificate of sale - Plot No.225 Part, 166.66 sq.yds., Sy.No.100, Padma Nagar Colony-II, Block No.49, Quthbullapur), treating the property as in the prohibited-property list under Section 22-A of the Registration Act per Gazette Notification RR No.83 communicated by the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy (File No.E5/4730/2013/Quthbullapur dt.25.09.2013), File No.B/583/2012 dt.17.02.2012 of the Deputy Collector & Tahasildar, and Gazette Notification No.134 dt.10.03.2005 with G.O.Ms.No.292 Revenue (Registration I) dt.09.03.2005 communicated by the Commissioner and Inspector General (R&S) (File No.G1/4661/2005 dt.02.07.2005). Counsel established that the 02-07-2005 and 25-09-2013 files had already been set aside by this Court's common order dt.22-03-2024 in W.P.No.9645 of 2021 and W.P.No.26353 of 2023 (which found File No.G1/4661/2005 not in accordance with Sections 22-A(1)(e) and 22-A(2) of the Registration Act and clause (vi) of the guidelines issued in the case of Viniamuri Raiagopala Chary a. State of Andhra Prqdeshl, cited at 2016(1) ALTsso (FB) as printed), yet Respondent No.3 reused them; the Assistant Government Pleader conceded the position. The Court directed Respondent No.3 to receive, register and release the pending document without reference to the refusal intimation, subject to compliance with the Indian Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamps Act, 1899, leaving the Registering Authority free to refuse on any other objection with duly assigned reasons; mere registration confers no title, the order has no bearing on pending title/rights adjudications (revision/appeal or otherwise), parties remain free to assert their rights before a competent court, and there is no order as to costs.