Dismissed¶40

Shaik Zakeer uddin v. The Telangana Civil Supplies Corporation

Telangana HC17 Jul 2025WP/1828/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; withdrawal permitted; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications closed; tender technical bid disqualification; proceedings dated 02.02.2024; Tender No. NZB/PDS2/Movt./FG 5(1)/Stage III/2023 dated 05.01.2024; transportation of food grains; Bodhan MLS Point; Nizamabad District; Telangana Civil Supplies Corporation; contract awarded to Respondent No. 2 Shaik Gouse; Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 226 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; I.A. Nos. 1-4 of 2024; T. Madhavi Devi, J.; decided 17.07.2025; no precedent discussed; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; no substantive relief granted. ¶40

Shaik Zakeer uddin Vs The Telangana Civil… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; no substantive relief granted.

¶40

Issue for consideration

Whether the action of the respondents in disqualifying the petitioner's technical bid vide proceedings dated 02.02.2024 under Tender No. NZB/PDS2/Movt./FG 5(1)/Stage III/2023 dated 05.01.2024 was illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, and whether the petitioner's technical bid should be qualified, the financial bid opened, and the contract awarded to the petitioner by cancelling the award made in favour of Respondent No. 2. (Raised in the petition but NOT adjudicated; the petition was withdrawn.)

¶19

Ratio / Principle

Permission is accorded to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition.

¶38

Key takeaways

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.ratio¶40
There shall be no order as to costs.ratio¶41
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed (sentence continues in para 43: 'petition, shall stand closed.').ratio¶42

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad - W.P. No. 1828 of 2024 (T. Madhavi Devi, J., order dated 17.07.2025). The petitioner, under Article 226, had challenged the disqualification of his technical bid vide proceedings Lr. No. NZB/PDS 2/Movt./FG 5(1)/Stage II/2023 dated 02.02.2024 in Tender No. NZB/PDS2/Movt./FG 5(1)/Stage III/2023 dated 05.01.2024 (transportation of food grains, Bodhan MLS Point, Nizamabad District), as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, and sought qualification of his technical bid, opening of the financial bid, and cancellation of the contract awarded to Respondent No. 2. Interim application I.A. No. 1 of 2024 (Section 151 CPC) sought a bar on entering agreement with Respondent No. 2; Respondents 3, 4 and 5 were impleaded and the prayer amended (I.A. Nos. 2-4 of 2024). Before any adjudication, learned counsel for the petitioner, supported by a letter dated 15.07.2025 to the Registrar (Judicial), sought permission to withdraw. The Court accorded permission, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, made no order as to costs, and closed pending miscellaneous applications. No question of merit or law was decided; no precedent was cited or relied upon.

¶1

[ 321e ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 1828 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

Shaik Zakeer uddin, S/o. Shaik Basheer uddin, Aged about 38 years, Occ Business, Ryo.^'1- 4- 1339, Gouse Nagar, Bodhan, Nizamabad - 5051S5.'

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The Telang_qna Civil Supplies Corporation, Rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.

¶12

2 Shaik Gouse, S/o. Shaik Moin Khan Aged about 38 years, Occ Business, Rl/o. 3-7- 128, Chekkipet, bodhan, Nizama6ad - 503 185.

¶13

3 The State of Telangana, B.ep Oy its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶14

(R3 is impleaded as per C.O. dt. 30.O1 .2024 in l.A. No. 2t2024)

¶15

4 The Additional Collector and EOED, The Telangana State Civil Supplies Corporation Nizamabad District, At Nizamabad.

¶16

5 The District Manager, TSCSCL Corporation Nizamabad District, At Nizama bad.

¶17

(R-e-spondent Nos. 4 and 5 are impleaded as per C.O.dt 30.01.2025 in lA No. 412024.)

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondents in disqualifying the Petitioner technical bid vide proceedings Lr. No. NZB /pDS 2/Movt./FG 5(1)/Stage ll/2023 dated 02.02.2024 submitied as per the Tender No. NZB/PDS2/Movt./FG 5(1)/Stage lll2023, Dated 05.01.2024 as illegat, arbitrary, violative Article 14, 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondents to qualify the petitioners technical bid and open the financial bid and if the Petitioner found as the lowest tenderer for BODHAN MLS Point, Nizamabad District, Tender No. NZB/pDS2/Movt./FG

¶20

¶21

5(1)/Stage llt2123, Dated 05.01.2024 aw^ard the^{Contract by cancellingthe} award made in favour of Respondent^{No.2 by setting aside the proceedings} dated 02.O2.2024

¶22

(Prayer amended as per C.O.dt. 09.02.2024 in^{l.A'NO.3/2024)}

¶23

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{praying thatin the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High court may be pleasedto direct} the Respondent No.¹ not to^{enter agreementwithRespondent No. 2 in pursuantto} the Tender Notification No. NZB/PDS2/MovI.^{/FG 5(1)/Stage 1112023, lfated05.} 01 . 2024 for transportation of^{food grains under stage ll frorn MLS Pointsto FP} shops, School Points and Anganwadi^{Centers (AWCs) for the year 2023-2025 for} Bodhan MLS Points, Nizamabad^{District, pendingdisposa of the above Writ} Petition

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. JELLA^SRIKANTH

¶26

Counsel forthe Respondent NO.1:.SRI^{GHALAKANI VENKAT YADAV}

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3,4&5:^{SRI K DEVENDER (SC FOR CIVIL} SUPPLTES CORP)

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

t I

¶30

\ t

¶31

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADTIAVI DEVI

¶32

WRIT PETITION No. 1828 of 2024

¶33

ORDER:

¶34

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and has also filed a letter dated 15.07.2025 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), High

¶35

Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, stating as under

¶36

"The aboue mentioned W.P.No.182B of 2024 tuas filed on 23.01.2024 bg Shaik T,akeer udclin seeking to issue an appropiate Wit Order or Direction more parliculartg one in the nohtre of Wit of Mandamus bg decLaing the action of the Respondents in disquolifuing the Petitioner technical bid uide proceedings Lr No NZB/PDS 2/Mout/FG SL/Stage n/2023 doted O2.O2.2O24 submitted as per the Tender tr[o NZB/ PDS2/ Mout/ FG 51/Stage ll/2O23 Dated 05.01.2O24 as illegal orbitrary uioLatiue Article 14 of the Constitution of Indta and consequentlg direct the Respondents to qualifu the Petitioners technical bid and open the financial bid and if the Petitioner found as the loutest tenderer Jbr BODHAN MLS Point Nizamabod Distict Tender No NZB/ PDS2/ Mout/ FG Sl/Stage II/ 2023 Dated 05-O1.2O24 autard the Contract bg cancelling tLrc autard made in fauour of Respondent No.2 bg setting aside the proceedings dated 02.02.2024.

¶37

The Petitioner hos requested us tct u.tithdrcut their case. The aboue petitioners moA be permitted to tuithdrow the W.P.No.1828 of 2024, hence gour goodself to List the matter tomorrolu under the aa.Ption of utithdranaal ."

¶38