Dismissed¶¶34

Syed Saleemuddin v. Prl.Secreatry (Sport) and 2 Others

Telangana HC31 Jan 2025WP/17541/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court (Special Original Jurisdiction), W.P. No. 17541 of 2017, decided 31.01.2025 by Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka. Tenant (Syed Saleemuddin / M/s. Victory Car Decors) of Shop No.5, Lal Bahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad challenged eviction notice dated 23.05.2017 issued by Deputy Collector, E & L, Sports Authority of Telangana State, alleging violation of natural justice and lease conditions. Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh writ petition or pursue alternate remedies; no costs; miscellaneous applications closed. No merits adjudication; no precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition or to avail remedies as available under law; no costs; miscellaneous applications pending, if any, stand closed. ¶¶34

Syed Saleemuddin Vs Prl.Secreatry (Sport) and 2… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰⁰¹

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 17541 OF 2017

¶7

Between:

¶8

Syed Saleemuddin, S/o Syed Nayeemuddin, Tenant of Shop No.5, Lala Bahadur Stadium, Hyderabad in the name and style of M/s. Victory Car Decors

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Y.A.T. & C (S) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶12

2 Sports Authority of Telangana, State Lal Bahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderdabad-1 , Rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director.

¶13

3 The Deputy Collector, E & L, Sports Authority of Telangana State, Lal Bahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing eviction notice vide No.SATS/E & L/LBS/Sl2017, dt.23.O5.2017 is illegal, arbitrary, in violation of principles of natural^justice and in violation of lease conditions and consequently set aside the same.

¶16

l.A. NO: 1OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 21414OF 20171

¶17

Petition under Section^'l 5'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned eviction notice vide No.SATS/E&L/LBS|5|2O17,

¶18

¶19

dt.23.OS.2O1Z issued by the 3rd respondent, pending petition. disposal of the above writ

¶20

l.A. NO: 20F 2017 PMP. NO: 236730F20171

¶21

Petition under Secl in the affidavit fi,"o ir:;;;;';,f;il:i:^ that in the circumstances stated receive the 1) calculation e High Court may be pleased to hotographs showing the closure of the main gate of ,n" '"'o^{along with 2) p} stadium as additionar w.p.No.17541 of 2017. material papers in the above

¶22

IAN o :1O F2019

¶23

petition under Se< 15i CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fifeO in su ;H:, I1"Tj il, ;HI{!li:,^[: r# :::Hl':rX: Hyderabad dr . 31.12.20178 ot 2013on the file of XVlll Addl. senior civir iuoge, og-02_2o1g. 8, 2) copy hearing notice issued o, ,n" ,".r0""", ,

¶24

Counset for the petitioner: SRI MUTHyALA MURALIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Gp FOR SPORTS Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI G.SATISH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.3; Gp FOR REVENUE

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

.-^- ---,"-.7

¶27

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA}

¶28

WRIT PETITION^{No.1754L of 2OLZ}

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Learned counsel for the^{petitioner'seeks permission of}