A writ petition concerning issuance of an Occupancy Rights Certificate was pending since 2018. With no representation by the petitioner on multiple hearing dates, the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution without costs and closed pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I I tI I l i i
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 17274 OF 2018
Between:
Chakali Chinna Rajaiah, age.Major, FUo Boompally village of Sadashivanagar mandal Kamareddy district Nizamabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praytng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed ttrcrewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly a WRIT OF MANDAMUS the action of the Respondent No.2 that he has not followed the mandatory procedure and allowed appeal filed by the respondent No.s to 7 file No.F11406/2014 and not consider proceeding No.A7l4955/20'12 of Respondent No.3 dated 28- 01-2014 for issuance of ORC in favour of thepetitioner and the action of the Respondent no.2 allowed the appeal file No.F1l406/2014 isas
t.
ii
illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articler 14 and 16 of the Constitution of lndia.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in lhe r;i cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co I t may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 Not to lssue ORC Occupancy ll ghts Certificate to the Respondent No.S to 7 in respect of tand lN SY N0.1S0i2 )cc2.11 guntas,l5O/4 acco.33 guntas an extent of acc.O4-20guntas that the rex pondent No.3 issued proceidng No.A7l4955/20 12 dated 28-01-2014 in favour of the peitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI G.RAJESHWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
i L
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PEf,ITIoN No.17274of2OLB
ORDER:
This petition is coming forhearing since 2018. On 21.04.2025 and 1l.O8.2O25,when the matter was called, there was norepresentation on behalf of the petitioner, and therefore thematter was directed to be listed today under the caption"For Dismissal". Even today,when the matter is called, thereis no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that thepetitioner is not interestedto prosecutc this case.
petition, shall standclosed '
SD/-B. REKHA RANI
AS STANT REGIS
/,TRUE COPY//
CTION OFFICER
To,
BSK
BS
I
l
HIGH COURT
DATED:0110912025
ORDER
I I Q r^
(
..
oo I
1 7 , tN ?026 z I
c)
),
-t
$c q16g(.
WP.No.17274 of 2018
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
v
/'
q.
(ey (r>
Chakali Chinna Rajaiah
The State of Telangana
The Joint Collector Addl. Dist. Magistrate, Kamareddy, Nizamabad
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kamareddy District Nizamabad
The Tahsildar, Sadashivanagar Mandal, Kamareddy Dist. Nizamabad
Smt Gaini (Thalari) Narsawa
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
