Writ petition seeking regularisation of the petitioner's services as a Telugu lecturer in an aided post with arrears. Counsel submitted that the petitioner was not in contact with her; the court accordingly closed the writ petition without any order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Is304 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT JYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction),
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FI'E
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITI ONN O:17222 oF 2005
Between:
i:f,!ffi i,ilsl$ll,jgi-#:ifii];"si.i1*.l;?'fij',"^::.r?rr5):
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Afticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or give a direction or issue a writ, more particurarry, a writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings of the director of Collegiate Education, Andhra pradesh, Hyderabad, the second respondent vide R C No 1587/Ad mn.rv-2r2004 dated 17 -2-2004 as arbitrary, iregar and nu, and void and consequenfly, direct the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner, as a recturer in Terugu in existing aided vacant post as a recturer in Telugu in S'V'S-A.Karasara, warangar since he is attached to grant-in-aid with arrears of pay_
l.A NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 21916 O F 2005)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thr: circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co rt may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the time scale of pay tc :he petitioner who is working as a lecturer in Telugu in an aided vacant post, fr< m grant-in-aid budget on par withother regular Iecturers working in S.V.S.a Kalasala, Warangal, pending the disposal of this Hon'ble Court may deem fit ar ( proper in the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NITHYA NAGESWARI
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCAII )N
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON'BLE SRI TUSTICE NAMAVARAPURA]ESHWARRAO
WRIT PETITI ON No.17222 oF2005
ORDER:
Learned counsel for thepetitioner submittedthat the
petitioner is not in contact withher.
2 In view of the abovesubmission,the Writ Petition is closed'
There shall be noorder as to costs.
Miscellaneouspetitions pending,if any, shall stand closed'
//TRUE COPY//
SD/.AHMEDABDULLAH KHAN ASSISTAN}EGISTRAR I <-J/,-
SECYloN OFFICER
BSR
Sr
!
t I I I i ; I 1
HIGH COURT
RRNJ
DATED:2310912025
ORDER
r 0 R THE :\r,l;)\i.
-%<br>r'
o 1 r; - 11't"
*
-t., ' ,.;/ l: '.'
WP.No.17222 of 2005
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION,
WITHOUT COSTS
t
c ?
1y
5(
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner name not legible in the document
Government, Higher Education, Govt of Andhra Pradesh
The Commissioner and Director of Collegiate Education, A.P., Hyderabad
The Regional Joint Director of Higher Education, Hanumakonda, Warangal
M/s Sri Visweswara Sanskruthandhra Kalasala, Station Road, Warangal, rep. by its Secretary cum Correspondent
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
