Writ petition filed for registration of criminal complaint was disposed at admission stage. The Court noted the alleged registeration of Cr. No.526/2025 and closed the petition without costs.
Writ petition closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3166 ]
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWELFTHDAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITIONNO:153520F2025
Between:
Smt. G. VasanthaReddy @G' Vasantha,W/9 G Sudhershan.Reddy'Age 'rr/bigidnarsni colony' Kothapet' Hyderabad 6o v",o. oi".nou.""tiJl,Flo
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle226 of lhe Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstancesstated'in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Courtmay be pleasedtoissueanappropriateWrit,OrderorDirection'moreparticularlyonein the nature ofwrit of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No'2 to 4infailingtoregisterthecomplaintofthepetitionerdt.l5'05.2025againstthe
=v
respondents No.5 to 8 by duly following the guidelines of the Hon'ble Apex court in Lalitha Kumari's case as per the provisions of BNSS Act as illegal, arbitrary, u ncon stitu tiona I and consequenfly direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 to forthwith register the complaint of the petitioner dtl 5.05.2025 and to investigate the same as per the provisions of BNSS Act by duly following the guidelines of the Honourable Apex Court in Lalitha Kumarr's Case.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petrtion under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 to forthwith register the complaint of the petitioner dt.'l 5.05.2025 as per the provisions of BNSS Act and to initiate the same by duly following the guidelines of the Hon'ble Apex court in Lalitha Kumari's Case, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. R.MADHAVI LATHA
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 4: Gp FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
\ I
HON'BLE SRIJUSTTCET. VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.15 352 of202s
ORDER:
Heard leamedcounsel for the petitioner and learned GovemmentPleaderfor Home appearingon behalf of respondent Nos.l to4, and perusedthe record' With the consentof the learned counsel appearingfor the respective parties, the Writ Petitionis taken up lor hearingand disposalat admissionstage'
.,.......
2
I
5 ln view of the above said submission, ancl since, basing on the complaint of thc petitioner, a case vide cr.No.5 26/2025 dated 11-06-2025 has been registered, the grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition stands redressed and no fi_rfther orders are necessaru.
stand closed.
To,
SD/. T.VIJAY KUMAR DEPUTY.REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// (i SECTION OFFICER
'1 . One CC to t/s. R.tvADHAVt LATHA, Advocate topucl
o BSR TKS
HIGH COURT
DATED:1210612025
ORDER
WP.No.15352 of 2025
::==-
s :; rjif,' -.
./
t<'
..)
,'] ,i
-_) 3 1 JlJL 2U5 ]I
i)
) I
v*
A
.s '.)
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION,
WITHOUT COSTS
orttff
Smt. G. Vasantha Reddy
The State of Telangana
The Secretary Home Department
The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda
The Deputy Commissioner of Police, LB Nagar Zone
Gowrishetti Business
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
