Balaji Traders v. the Union. of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Recovery agent harassment; coercive loan recovery by banks and NBFCs; writ of mandamus under Article 226; violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21; RBI guidelines and instructions, Circular dated 12.08.2022; ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Prakash Kaur (2007) 2 SCC 711; ICICI Bank v. Shanti Devi Sharma (2008) 7 SCC 532; respondents include HDFC Bank, IndusInd Bank, IDFC First Bank, State Bank of India, SBI Cards, ICICI Bank, Yes Bank, Axis Bank, SMFG India Credit Co., Godrej Finance, Poonawalla Fincorp, Unity Small Finance Bank, Clix Capital Services, NeoGrowth Credit, Indian Bank, Bajaj Finserv, Mahindra Finance, Union of India and Reserve Bank of India; disposed of following W.P.No.5200 of 2024 dated 25.04.2024; interim application under Section 151 CPC; no costs; Telangana High Court, W.P. No. 14372 of 2025, decided 10.11.2025.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of in terms of the order in W.P.No.5200 of 2024 dated 25.04.2024: respondent authorities and their agents directed to scrupulously follow the RBI guidelines/instructions in its Circular dated 12.08.2022 and the Supreme Court judgments in ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Prakash Kaur and ICICI Bank v. Shanti Devi Sharma while recovering loan amounts from the petitioner; pending miscellaneous applications closed; no costs.