Writ petition challenging a temple endowment notice and alleged interference with the petitioner's construction was not decided on merits; counsel sought leave to withdraw and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Is300 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14078 OF 2024
Between:
Smt.Vanam Anuradha, W/o. V.Sri Ram Reddy, Aged about 48 years, Occ. House Wife, Rl/o. H.No.4-9-6117, HUDA Colony, Attapur Village, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of lVlandamus to declare the actions of the Respondent No.5 in issuing the Notice vide LT.No.SRCST/0112024-1 , d1.0610512O24 and also in interfering into the construction carried out by the Petitioner in Premises No.4-6-135/5 Southern Portion, admeasuring 200 Sq.yards or 167.2 Sq.lr/eters(Out of 283 Sq.Yards) covered in Survey.No.345 and 346 situated at Ram Bagh, Attapur Village, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, as illegal and violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the Article 21 of the Constitution of
..;
lndia and consequently direct the Respondents No.3 to 5 not to interfere with the possession, enjoyment and construction of the Petitioner in aforesaid House Pre m ises.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section'15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the Respond ents. no.3 to 5 not to interfere with thepossesston, enjoyment and construction carried out by Petitioner in Premises No.4-6-135/5 Southern Portion, admeasuring 200 Sq.yards or 167.2 Sq.lr/eters(Out of 283 Sq.Yards) covered in Survey.No.345 and 346 situated at Ram Bagh, Attapur Village, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MS. SUMALATHA, REPRESENTING SRI K. L. B. KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for the Respondent No.S: SRI J.R. MANOHAR RAO, SC FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following: ORDER
1,
wp L4074_2024 NBK,I
THE HON' BtE SRIJUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No.14078 ot 2024
ORDER:
Ms. Sumalatha, learned counsel representing Mr. KLBKumar, learned counsel on record for thepetitionel seekspermission ofthis Court to withdraw the writpetition.
SD/-V.KAVITHA SS TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII
I I
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to Sri K. L. B. Kumar, Advocate tOpUCl 2 ttyoerabad IyjC9. to- Gp_for [OUT]Endowments, High Court for rhe State of Telangana, at 3 9r" 99lo Sri J.R. Manohar Rao, SC for Endowme 4. nt[OOPUC] t wo CD Copies T J Lr J P
i I I I I I i I i
HIGH COURT
DATED:04102t2025
ORDER
WP.No.14078 of 2024
e
,2<br>ll ,.) it 3 JUN M25 c.' i
{r
D4'
;r rATC:dgO
DIMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
y
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Vanam Anuradha
The State of Telangana, Department of Endowments
The Commissioner of Endowments, Government of Telangana
The Deputy Commissioner, Endowments
The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments
The Executive Officer, Sri Seetharama Chandra Swamy Temple
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
