Writ petition challenging police inaction in registering FIR against private parties for illegal seizure of vehicles; disposed of following precedent in WP.No.7159 of 2025 & batch.
Disposed of following the common order in WP.No.7159 of 2025 & batch dated 10.03.2025; no order as to costs. ¶41
The writ petition is disposed of following the decision in WP.No.7159 of 2025 & batch dated 10.03.2025, as the issues are squarely covered by that common order. ¶41
J
[3166 ]
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THEFIRST DAYOF MAY TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE T.VINODKUMAR
N NO: 13538 0F2025 WR]T PETITI
Between:
lftekhar Ahmed,S/o. Muqtar Ahmed, Aged41 years'Occ'Construction i,iiiLi[r oeirei,'nyo.H. il6. s-a-is6rbe,iamalikdnta,7 Tombs,Golkonda, Hyderabad, T.S.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 ot lhe constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed therewith' the High court may be
pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents, particularly respondent No. 2 to 5, in registering FrR against Respondents No.6 to g as per the complaint filed by the petitioner and thereby giving a free hand to the Respondents No. 6 to g to seize vehicles of the petitioner as per their whims and fancies and without foflowing due process of raw, as iflegar, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Article 19 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and seeking consequential directions against Respondent No.2 to 5 to register FIR and against the Respondents No. 6 to g herein to forthwith stop interfering with the Petitioner's vehicles bearing Nos. Ap 28 Tc 4368, TS 13 uB 3467, TS 12 uD 7495 and AP 13 s 7860 and to restore the possession of the iilegaily seized vehicle bearing No. TS 21 T 37To and costs may be awarded in the interest of justice.
lA NO: 1 oF 202s
Petition under section I 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to restrain the Respondent No. 6 to g from seizing or interfering with the possession of the four vehicres beronging to the petitioner and hypothecated with the Respondent No.6 tog bearing Nos. Ap 28 Tc 4368, TS 13 uB 3467, TS 12 uD 7495, in the interest of justice.
1A NO: 2 OF 202s
Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cou( may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 6 to g to restore possession of the iflegaly seized vehicre bearing No. TS 21 T 3710, in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHAMMED ASIF
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.i to 5: Gp FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to g:The Court made thelollowing: ORDER
I I
THE HON'BtE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
W.P.No. 13538 of 2025
ORDER:
The grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition is that basing on the complaint made by the petitioner on 15.03.2025, the respondents-authorities are not initiating action by registering the FIR against respondent Nos.6 to 9, which action of the respondents-authorities it is contended as highly illegal and arbitrary.
2
6 Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
\
SD/-N. SRIHARI //rRUE coPYil REGrsrRAR l[u" t\
.aa"r,o,u oFFrcER
To
TJ
LS
I
HIGH COURT
I
DATED:01 10512025
ORDER
f Y oF r€(
o
a
<,,
T
Lia s .$ o '*
a.
^$ F{
ao
&n .l T
WP.No.13538 of 2025
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS
0 (,r
u \L
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the failure of respondents 2-5 to register FIR based on complaint dated 15.03.2025 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution¶24
Whether respondents 6-9 can be restrained from seizing/interfering with petitioner's vehicles bearing Nos. AP 28 TC 4368, TS 13 UB 3467, TS 12 UD 7495 and AP 13 S 7860¶26
Whether direction for restoration of possession of vehicle TS 21 T 3710 allegedly illegally seized should be granted¶28
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WP.No.7159 of 2025 & batchApplied¶39
WP.No.7159 of 2025 & batch, dt.10.03.2025
3 provisions across 2 enactments
How this case reached the court
Sri Justice T. Vinod Kumarauthor¶7
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
