M/s. Dynamic Staffing Services Pvt. Ltd., Vs The… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

M/s. Dynamic Staffing Services Pvt. Ltd., Vs The… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

None. The petitioner's rights are reserved to file appropriate remedies before the concerned Magistrate if the cause survives; there is no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions are directed to stand closed.

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents' failure, since 25.7.2016, to conduct any investigation into Crime No.391/2016 (registered against respondent No.3 and another on reference by the XV Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal), as prayed in the writ petition, is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, warranting a direction to respondent No.2 to complete the investigation within a time-frame and file a final report. +1 more

Ratio / Principle

Having regard to the developments transpired during the pendency of the petition, and as the petitioner's concern has been substantially addressed, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Key takeaways

The rights of the petitioner are reserved to file appropriate remedies before the concerned Magistrate if the cause survives.ratio¶45

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Single-judge order of Justice N. Tukaramji (High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, Special Original Jurisdiction, dated 01.09.2025) dismissing as infructuous Writ Petition No.13322 of 2017 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by M/s. Dynamic Staffing Services Private Limited. The petition sought a mandamus declaring illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution the respondents' failure, since 25.7.2016, to investigate Crime No.391/2016 — registered against respondent No.3 (M. Vishnu alias Srihari alias Chittanjallu Vishnu) and another on reference by the XV Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal — and directing respondent No.2 (Station House Officer, Pet Basheerabad Police Station) to complete the investigation within a time-frame and file a final report; an associated Misc. Petition No.16532 of 2017 under Section 151 CPC sought an interim report on steps taken. During pendency, the crime was duly investigated and a final report filed on 02.10.2016 endorsing 'lack of evidence' (as submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home), substantially addressing the petitioner's concern; the court accordingly dismissed the petition as infructuous, reserved the petitioner's rights to file appropriate remedies before the concerned Magistrate if the cause survives, made no order as to costs, and directed pending miscellaneous petitions to stand closed. No precedent is cited anywhere in the judgment.

132171

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

WRIT PETITION NO: 13322 OF 2017

Between:

M/s. Dynamic Staffing Services P\i,t. Ltd., Regd. Office at Kh.No.71 , Bhagrola, Sector-8, Dwaraka, New Delhi rep. by its Manager of Suchitrar, Mr. Naveed Ghiyasuddin S/o. Mohammad Ghiyasuddin, 33^years, rlo. 4-1-6, Maphars Residency, Ramkote, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER

AND

The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A P Secretariat, Hyderabad

The Station House Officer, Pet Basheerabad Police Station, Pet Basheerabad, Cyberabad District at Hyderabad.

Sri M.Vishnu @ Srihari Mittpelly @ M.Srihari @ Chittanjallu Vishnu S/o. Chinttanjallu Venkateshwar Rao, aged 34 years, Recruiting Executive,^r/o. Fiat No. 302, Sy.No. 83, Suchitra Circle, Qubullahpur Mandal, R.R.District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the rd respondent herein in not conducting any investigation into the Crime No.391/2016 registered against the 3'd respondent and another on its reference by the XV Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal as long back as on 25.7.2016 atleast by recording the^petitioners 161 statement and trying to know whereabouts of the 3rd respondent as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the^2nd respondent to conduct and complete the investigation into the aforesaid^crime within a time frame and to file final report.

MP. NO: 16532 OF 2017

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to submit a report with respect to steps taken in consequence to registration of Crime No. 391 12016 on 25.7.2016 on its reference by the XV f\tletropolitan Magistrate, Medchal, to this Hon'ble Court, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counselfor the Petitioner: SRI BARKHA BHALLA

Counsel for the Respondents No.1 & 2: SRI R. LAXMIKANTH REDDY, AGP FOR HOME

Counselfor the Respondent No.3: -

The Court made the following: ORDER

I

\ \

/--)

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

WRIT PEIITION No.13322 OF'2O17

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed un{er Article 226 of

Constitution of India seeking the follo*ing relief/s:-

'... to issue an appropriate wrig order or direction, more in the nature of lvfandamus, declaring the action of the rd respondent herein in not conducting any investigation into the Gime No.391l2015 registered against the 3rd respondent and another on its reference by the XV IvGtropolitan lvlagistrate, I&dchal as long back as on 25.7.20L6 atleast by recording the petitioners 161 statement and trying to know whereabouts of the 3nC respondent as being illegal, arbitraryand is in violation of Article 21 of the C-onstitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct and complete the investigation into the aforesaid crime within a time frame and to file final report, and pass such other order or orden may deem fit and proper. ... ."

Flearid lvlr.Barkha Bhalla, leamed counsel for the petitioner

and htlr.Rla:<mikanth Reddy, learned fusistant Govemment

Pleader for Ftrome appearing for respondent Nos.L arld2.

kamed counsel for the petitioner would submit that, as

respondent No.3 has not been conducting proper investigation in Crime No.391 of 2016 on the file of the XV Metropolitan IMagistrate, Medchal, this petition was filed seeking necessary

direction to the resrpondent police authorities

2

(-.'-

Learned fusistant Govemment Pleader for Home would

submit that, crime was dulyinvestigated bythe police and filed final report on 02.10.20t6 endoning 'lack of evidence', rhus, the cause ooes t. not suMve.

I have perused the materials on record.

Flaving regard to the development transpired d*i"g pendency of the petition and as the conrest of the petitioner has been substantially addressed, the cause raised in the petition, is

dismissed as infructuous. I{owever, the rights of the petitioner are resenred to file appropriare remedies before lMagistrate concemed,

if the cause survives. There shall be no order as ro cosrs.

Miscellaneorx Petitiors, pending if *y, shall sand closed.

SD/. K.BHAVANI^SWAMY ISTANT RE

/TRUE COPY/

SECTION OFFICER

To

One CC to^{SRIBARKHA BHALLA, Advocate[O}

Two CCs to GP^{for Hbme, High Court for the} of Telangana at Hyderabad.tOUTl

Two CD^CoPies

tVIP TKS Pt^z\

tI

I I I i ti il ii I il ii 1i ii ii

HIGH COURT

DATED:01/09/2025

1HE i: I.r1 >--
, a-
..)
.-)
t.) t:
19 DEr ilffi
* {:
,1,
rrnr(1111-: (1
ORDER

WP.No.13322 of 2017

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION

lott:-tr{