Mudivarthi Murali Mohan v. The State of Telengana
Case brief
What is this about?
Telangana High Court; Writ Petition No. 13276 of 2018; dismissal for non-prosecution; no representation despite repeated calls; party-in-person Mudivarthi Murali Mohan; Article 226 mandamus; independent agency enquiry into complaint dated 22-03-2017 and reminder dated 24-10-2017; alleged tampering of Court order dated 08-08-2006 in Crl.M.P.No.3103/2006 with forensic examination; C.C.No.56/2002 and C.C. No. 0140374 before XIII Addl. CMM Nampally; P.S. Malakpet to produce A2 and A3; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications closed.
What did the court decide?
Since there was no representation for the petitioners on repeated calls (nor on the previous date of hearing), the Bench concluded that the grievance stood redressed or the petitioners were not interested in pursuing the writ petition, and accordingly dismissed it for want of prosecution / non-prosecution, with no order as to costs.