Vasala Venkataramana Vs The State of Telangana

1 Vasala Venkataramana, S/o Vasala Sreenivas, aqed about 49 vears. Occ.Business, R/o H.No. 2-2-249,^yawar Road, Jagityil, farimnagai Oistiici, Telangana State.

¶11

2 Vasala Satish Kumar, S/o Vasala Sreenivas, aged about 46 years, Occ. Private Emloyee, Rio H.No 2-2-248, yawai Rtad, Jagityai, kaiininigir District, Telangana State.

¶12

3 Vasala Chandra Sekhar, S/o Vasala Sreenivas, aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No. 1-10-190, New Bowenpally, SecunderabaU,'feiairganJ State.

¶13

.....PETITIONERS

¶14

AND

¶15

The 9tate of Telangana, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep. by the Principal Secretary.

¶16

The Superintendent of Police, Jagityal, Karimnagar District, Telangana State

¶17

The Station House Office_r, Jagityal Town -^police Station, Jagityal Town, Karimnagar, Telangana State.

¶18

Smt. Veerabathini Padmavathi, Wo Bale Satyanarayana, aged about 46 fgars,^{Occ.Household,R/o HNo. i-'l-5714,3iU loor,Sri Go-uriNilayam,} thilukawada,^{Beside DevisriGarden Lane, Bypass Road,Jagityat-bOS'SZl,} Karimnagar Diskict, Telangana State

¶19

Bale Satyanarayana, S/.o_Qqle Purandamulu, aged about 55 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No. 1-1-S714,3rd floor, Sri Goiri Nilayam, Chilukawada, Beside Devisri Garden Lane, Bypass Road, Jagityal- fiOS SZt , Karimnagir District, Telangana State.

¶20

.....RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or other appropriate order or direction in the

¶22

!r*

¶23

nature of a !'rit declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering in the civil dispute and harassing the petitioners herein and their family members as violative of Articles 14, 19 and 3004 of Constitution of lndia and consequently restrain the respondent No.3 from interfering in civil matter and harassing the petitioners herein or their family members in the interest of justice.

¶24

l.A.NO:1 OF 2r118

¶25

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere in the civil dispute among the family members of the petitioners and refrain from harassing the petitioners herein or their family members memrers pending disposal of the above Writ Petition in the interest of justice.

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI B.NALIN KUMAR

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : SRI D.PRADEEP, AGP FOR HOME

¶28

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5 : --

¶29

The Court made the following ORDER

¶30

,1,":

¶31

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEN.TUKARAMJI}

¶32

ORDER:

¶33

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

¶34

lndia seeking the following relief.

¶35

"...fo lssue a Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate order or direction in the nature of a Writ declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering in the civil dispute and harassing the petitioners herein and their family members as violative of Articles 14, 19 and 30OA of Constitution of lndia and consequently restrain the respondent No.3 from interfering in civil mafter and harassing the petitioners herein or their family members in the interest of^justice and pass..."

¶36

Heard Mr.B.Nalin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Heard Mr.D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home

¶37

appearing for respondents No.1 to 3

¶38

. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that respondent No.3 is interfering in the civil disputes and harassing the petitioners and their family members. Hence, indulgence of this Court is sought along with appropriate directions to the respondent^police authorities.

¶39

'\ 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that the allegation of interference in the civil dispute is unfounded and unsupported by any material. He further asserts that the respondents/police authorities are acting strictly within the legal

¶40

J

¶41

2

¶42

parameters. Thus, the contention of the^petitioners lacks^{merit, and}

¶43

dismissal^,:f the^petition is sought.

¶44

I have perused the material available^{on record}

¶45

The assertion of the^petitioners in the^{affidavitis that the} respondents/police authorities are^{interferingin the civil disputes.} Having reg;ard to the^{pleadingsand the well-settled limitationson} police involvement in civil matters, respondent^{No.3 is directedto} refrain front interfering in the^{petitioners' civil disputes and shallnot} harass the^petitioners or their family^{membersin any manner.lt is} made clear that any action taken by the^{respondents/police authorities} strictly in ac:cordance with law and^{by following due processshallnot} be adversel'7 construed.

¶46

With tlre above direction, this Writ Petition^{is disposedof. There} shall be no crrder as to costs.

¶47

Pendirrg miscellaneous applications,^{if any, shall standclosed}

¶48

SD/-B. REKHA RANI

¶49

ssrSTANT RE //TRUE COPY//

¶50

SECTION OFFICER

¶51

1. The Princi;ral Secreta ry, Home Department, riat, State of Telangana at Hyderabad

¶52

2 The Superirtendent of police , Jagityal, Karimn ag District, Tela ngana State 3. The Station House Officer , Jagityal Town Potice Station, Jagityal Town, Karimnagar, Tela ngana State-

¶53

To

¶54