Vutla Naga Venkata Sai Srikar Vs Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited

¶1

[3301 J

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD {Speciat^{Original Jurisdiction)}

¶3

MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULEA KARTHIK

¶6

WRIT PETIT]ON NO: 12919 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 Vutla Naga Venkata Sai Srikar, S/o Sri Vutla phani Kumar. Aoed 25 vears. Occ. Doctor, R/o. H. NO. 1--103, Swathi High Schoot RoaO, tr,liruttri tiagai, lVladhapur Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy Dis'irict, TS -500084.

¶9

2 Smt Padmaja.Vu!19, W1o Sri Vutla phani Kumar, Aged anout 53 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H. NO. 1-103, Sruathi High Scho-ol Road, Marirthi Nagar, Madhapur Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy Diatrict, TS -500084

¶10

...PETITIONERS

¶11

AND

¶12

1 Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad Rep. by its Chairman-cum-l\landging Direcor.

¶13

2 The Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern power Distribution Corporation Limited, Vidyuth Soudha-, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.

¶14

3 The Asst- Divisional Engineer, Telangana State Southern power Distribution Corporation Limited, Ayyappa Society, [/adhapur, Hyderabad.

¶15

4 Greater Hyderabqd Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad Circle, Serilingampally Zone Rep. by its Commissioner

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not receiving the application form and not transferring the tifle (sc.No.1200103125) in the name of the petitioners for plot bearing Nos. 262 and 263 in Survey Nos. 11119, 11120 and 11121, admeasuring 623.3 Square yards or equivalent to 521 . 07 Square meters, situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequenfly direct

¶18

-w ',*/

¶19

the respondents to transfer the title^(SC.No. 1200103125) in the^name of petitioner without being influenced by the instructions of the respo-tdent No. 4.

¶20

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶21

Petition unde' Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumsiances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may' be^{pleased to} direct the Respor^rJerrt Nos. 1 to 4 to receive the application forn and to transfer the title (SC.No. 1:200103125) in the name of^petitioners for^plot b:aring Nos. 262 and 263 in Survel, Nos. 1 1/19, 1112O and 11121 , admeasuring 623.3 Square yards or equivalent la 521 . 07 Square meters, situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana,^pencling disposal of the above Writ Petitron.

¶22

KA'TLAVA'. counser ror the Petition"'' [; ff]hE?f,t$o, cou nse I for Res ponde nts No. 1 to3, s[,SR[=r?itt RE D DY,

¶23

Counsel for Respondent No.4 : SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER

¶24

;.

¶25

':/

¶26

THT HON'BLE SRI WSTICE PULLA I{ARTHIK -

¶27

WRrT PETITION No. 12919 OF 2o25 z

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

This Writ Petition is frled, under Article 226 ol the

¶30

Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:

¶31

"...ro issue^qn appropidte Wit, order or direction^{more parliculdrlAone in} the nature of wit of Mandamus dectaing the action of the^{Respondents in not} receiuing the appltcetton form and not trdnsJering the^titte (SC.NI.12OO1O3125) in the name of tlle petitioners for plot bearing Nos.262 and 263 in Surueg Nos.11/ 19, 11/ 20 and^{11/ 21, admeasuing 623.3 Square} gards or equiualent to 521.07 Square t\eters, situated at Khandmet Village, Serilingampally Mdnddl, Rangct Reddg Distict,^Telangana as^{illegal, null,} uoid, arbitrary ald consequentlg clirect tlle^{respondentsto trdnsferthelitle} (SC.N1.12OO1O3125) in the narne oJ petitioner utithout bei\g inJluenced^blJ Ute itLstntchons of the respondent No.4 anu) to^p(1ss... "

¶32

{ {

¶33

Heard Ms.Nikita Goenka, learned counsel representing Ms.Kapilavayi Parameswari, learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for^Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, for respondent Nos.1 to 3; and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy,^{learned Standing} Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,^for respondent No.4. With their consent, this Writ Petition^is taken^up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶34

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that^{the subject} matter of this Writ Petition is squarely covered by^{the order of this} Court in W.P.No. 17713 of 2024,^{dated09.07.2O24,and requested} this Court to^pass similar order in^{the present Writ Petition also.}

I
I
l

PI,.1 wp 12919 2025

2

I

The same s not seriously disputed by the^{learnedStanding} Counsel for the respondents

¶40

In vict o'the above submissions and for the reasorrs alike in the order o1 this Court in W.P.No. 17713 of 2O'.''4, dated 09 .O7 .20'24 ,^r iris Writ Petition is disposed of perm itting the petitioners to^-rle representation/ s along with the title decds before the,respondcrts within a period of two (2) weeks from loday. On receipt of sr-rcl-L representation/ s, the respondents shall consider the same a.nc pass necessary orders thereon strictly on merits within a pe:'ic,cl oI two (2) weeks thereafter and commrtnicated a copy of the s;,arrLe to the petitioners.

¶41

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sha11 starrd closed.

¶42

There sha11 l;e no order as to costs.

¶43

SD/- L. -AKSHMI BABU ^DEPUTY^REGISTRAR

¶44

//TRUE COPY//

¶45

To,

¶46

\l SE(]TION OFFICER