Disposed¶29

Sri. N. Venkat Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC20 Feb 2025WP/12374/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court writ petition WP.No.12374 of 2024 (N. Venkat Reddy v State of Telangana / SHO Alwal / N. Gopal Reddy), Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy, disposed as infructuous on 20-02-2025; complaint of police interference in civil suit O.S.No.134 of 2023 pending before II Addl. District Judge Medchal; writ of mandamus under Article 226; interim IA No.1 of 2024 under Section 151 CPC closed as sequel; no order as to costs; no merits adjudicated, no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief adjudicated; writ petition disposed of as infructuous, no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous petitions (including I.A. No.1 of 2024) closed. ¶29

Sri. N. Venkat Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³¹⁸³ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶6

w RIT PETITION NO: 1 2374 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sri. N. Venkat Reddy, S/o: Sri Mohan^{Reddy,Aged about52 years,} Occupation Business, Rl/o^{H.No.1-24-2311} ,^{Venkata Puram, Near Last Bus} Stop, Alwal, Secunderabad.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Represented by^{its Principal Secretary, Department} of Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

2 The Station House Officer, Alwal Police^{Station,tt4edchal-MalkajgiriDist.}

¶13

a Sri. N. Gopal Reddy, S/o N. Mohan Reddy, Aged^{about 45 years, Occupation} Business, R/o H.No.24-22lA, Doddi Alwal, Hyderabad.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia^{prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High Court maybe} pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more^particularly one in the^{nature of a} writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the^{2nd respondent in interferingwith} civil dispute pending in O.S.No.'1 34 of 2023 on^{the file of ll Addl.DistrictJudge at} Medchal, by calling me to the^police station and^{threatening me with dire} consequences of evection by using^{policeforce without any authorityor} jurisdiction as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded, cannot be^justified in the eye of law.

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in^{the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct} the 2nd respondent not to harass^me by^{interferingwith civil dispute pendingin}

¶18

o.s.No.134 of zozp on the fire of il Addr. District Judge at Medchar, pending disposal of the aborie main Writ Petition.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SYED WAHEED ALI

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent Nos..l and 2: Gp FOR HOME

¶21

Counsel forthe Respondent No3: SRI L. HARISH

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

':'wy

¶24

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{B. VIJAYSEN REDDY}

¶25

WRIT PETITION No.12374 OF 2024

¶26

ORDER: (ORAL)

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner^{submittedthat the cause in the} writ petition does not survive for further^{adjudication and the matterhas} become infructuous.

¶28

In view of the above no^{further ordersare requiredto be passed.}

¶29

The writ petition is disposed^{of as infructuous.There shalt be no order}

¶30

as to costs.

¶31

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous^{petitions, if any,pending in}

¶32

the writ petition stand^closed.

¶33

SD'. K.^AMMAJI SISTANT^REGISTRAR

¶34

//TRUE^COPY//

¶35

SECTION^OFFICER

¶36

To, eofTe^{langana, at} i ?'l: 33 Ji"'8,'^{I3,0,{3,i::j.#''"3#?:71f;J"J#} .^{g'"t""tttS l:ur-llH} "i'n' Ad^vocate [oP^{U c]} 4. Two^{CD CoPies} TJ GJP^Yv

HIGH COURT

DATED:2010212025

ORDER

WP.No.12374 ot 2024

4
05 fiAY 296
9)l
)+ I
ospAir: uEo-,

¶42

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS