A writ petition challenging a memo staying excise orders concerning toddy business was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent when the matter was listed under specially identified cases.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s5 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OFDECEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO:12164 OF 2018
Between:
G. Venkataiah Goud, S/oG.BagannaGaud, age 70 years' Rtd Employeeand irpper, i.No zlzq,Se1 Colon-yBandameedifallyMahabubnagarmandal and district Telangana State-50900'1 .
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of Inri r praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass Writ Orders more particularly one in e nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the .1st Responder . in issuing [Vlemo lio.4223lEx.11(2)t2O1B-1 dated 24.02.2018 by staying the : ders of Respondent No.4 in Rc.No.46/1 133t2017. dated 16.10.2017,13.12.201-,, and 18.12.2017 and also directing the Respondent No.1 0 to continue its toddy I rsiness for period of two months is being illegal, arbitrary and violative of th l natural justice and consequently the 1st ,2nd and 5th Respondents may be dirr-, :ted to collect all the rental dues as per the Law.
i.A.NO:1 OF 2018
Petition Under section 151 cpc praying that in the circ rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court mz ) be preased to pass interim orders suspending the orders of the '1st Respondri rt in issuing Memo No.4223 I Ex.lt(2)t 20 1 8-1 dated 24.02.20 1 B.
Counsel for the petitioner : SRI MUSUDI BABJ(NOT PRESE lT)
counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 8 : Gp FoR pRoHlBlil )N AND ExclsE
Counsel for the Respondent No.g : Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.10 & 11 : _
Counsel for the Respondent No.12 : SRI K.SRINIVAS
The Court made the following ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.12164 of 2OL8 DATE OF ORDER: L2.L2.2O25
Between:
G.Venkataiah Goud, S/o.G.Baganna Goud
...Petitioner
AND
The State ofTelangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise-Ilf Department T.S. Secretariat, Tank Bund, Hyderabad and 11 Others
...Respondents
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up consideration, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in thephysical mode or in the virtual mode, inspite of the matter being listed under the caption "specially identihed cases". Hence, there is no
other option to this Court except to dismiss t re Writ Petition for non-prosecution
2 Accord ingly, the Writ petition lSi dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to c. its.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applicari rns if an.y pending in this petition, shall stand closed.
SDL\ SRtN|VASA REDDY ASS STANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
-/
To
SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:1211212025
ORDER
<br>k
t
oJ
't' )_.
22 oii, ffi
.-\ ,/t
--
WP.No.12164 of 2O1B
DISMISSING THE W.P
FOR NON - PROSECUTION
cl_
WITHOUT COSTS, OA Ytr , )7 \z
2 provisions across 2 enactments
G. Venkataiah Goud
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise-II) Department
Tappers Cooperative Society (TCS), Mahabubnagar
Sri G. Srinivasulu Goud
G. Lingam Goud
N.V. Shravan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
