Writ petition challenging a notification permitting import of maize corn at 15% in-quota tariff rate; petitioner sought permission to withdraw, which was granted. Petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t3488I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.M. MOHIUDDIN
Between:
M/s Sai Nine Enterprises, Rep by its partner K.Prashanthi Wo K Mahidhar Age 43 years, Occ. Business, No B-2-120l12olal10la9, Nandi Nagar, Road No 14, Banjara Hills Hyd -34.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 1st respondents in issuing notification No 28/2020 Daled 231612020 perpetually permitting to import Tariff item Maize corn 1005 90 other then seed quality to an extent of 5,00,000 Metric tons alias of 15 percent duty/in-quota tariff rate in a financial year as being illegal, arbitrary, Bad faith, improper motive contrary to world trade organization agreements and in utter violation of principles of natural Justice besides unconstitutional.
2tO23
Petitior under Section1 51 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt maybe pleased to suspend the operation of the Notification No2812020Daled231612020 and pending disposal of the above Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.VENKATRAMANAFORSRI M.GOVIND REODY
Counsel for the Respondents: DEPUW SOLICITORGENERALOF INDIA The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HTGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APAR,ESH KUMAR SINGH
AND
THE HON'BI,E SRI JUSTICB G.M.MOHIUDDIN
WRIT PETITION No.l L26O of 2023
Dated: 25.03.2026
Between:
M/s. Sai Nine Enterprises
Petitioner
and
The Union ot'lndia,
Rep. by its Joint Secretary,
MinisLry of [rinance, Revenue Department, 46, North Block, New Delhi - I l0 001, and 3 others.
...Respondents
ORDER:
Learned counsel Sri M.Venkatramana, representing learned
counsel Sri M.Govind Reddy, appears for the petitioner.
2. The writ petition is preferred seeking the following relief:
"F'or the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner hereirr prays that tlris FIon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction rnorc particularly one in the nature of writ of
2
Mandamus declaring the action of thc l't respondent in issuiug rrotification No.28/2020 dated 2i-6..2020 perperually perrnitting to import Tariff itern Maizc corn 1005 90 other tlicn seed quality to an extent of 5,00,000 Metric tons @ l5 percent duty/in-quota tariff rate in a financial year as being illegal, arbitrary, bad faitlr, irnproper motive. contrary to rvorld trade organisation agreements and in utter violation of principlcs of naturaljustice besides unconstitutionaland pass such other order or orders in the circunlstances olthe case."
to withdraw the rvrit petition.
shall bt: rlo order as to costs
\4iscellaneous applications pending, if any. shall stand closed.
SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUW REGISTRAR
/TRUE COPYII
To
OFFICER
PSK.
TKS tu
l
HIGH COURT
DATED:2510312026
ORDER
WP.No.1'{"26O o12023
-15=
'( k\r.
J/cl
F
o(J O B A.Pil 2028 il;,
r, i,
-\il
j; <,. '-11.,1
,k
_09. .I -ii.l ;'-,1?'?./,.
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
TrZ +l+lu
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Sai Nine Enterprises
The Union of India, Rep. by its Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Revenue Department
The Directorate General of Foreign Trade, Rep. by the Director General of Foreign Trade
Deputy Secretary to Govt of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue
The Dy. Director General of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industries
Aparesh Kumar Singh
G.M. Mohiuddin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
