Disposed

M.Amrutha Valli v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC15 Apr 2025WP/11175/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A retired government employee filed a writ petition seeking release of gratuity, commutation, EL/HPL and GPF amounts withheld after retirement on 30.09.2024. The Government stated bills were processed but funds were short. The High Court disposed of the petition directing release within ten weeks, without costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to release and pay retirement benefits (gratuity Rs.16,00,000/-, commutation Rs.28,61,232/-, EL/HPL Rs.19,71,215/-, GPF Rs.8,03,387/-) preferably within ten weeks.

M.Amrutha Valli Vs The State of Telangana — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰⁴ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE S] AT HYDEJfJEDOF^TELANGANA (Speciat Originat Juris-diction)

¶3

ruEgp^ly, rHE F|FTEENTH DAy oF ApRrL TWo THoUSAND AND rwtr.rri'rivr.,.

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITI ONN O:11 175 0F 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

;5t;.gjli:t,-r.ffi ;,i"hiqlh#[[ri^jr".,riliijri:,ry

¶9

AND

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

J::,.:,t3,l"rit l?Btt#.1 rept. bv its spr.chier secretary, Finance Department

¶12

I ,IX",Bli::'BtilI!",lXi:::ili4::ounts,^Government or reransana,

¶13

The District Treasury Officer, Sangareddy, Sangareddy District.

¶14

4 The Sub Treasury Officer, Sangareddy, Sangareddy District. 5. The Director of Medical Education, Koti, Hyderabad.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direntin^ ^r rr,.;. -writ or Mandamus, r"",::"'';:'Til:: T::":ii,fl iffJff:,lTl releasing and paying the retirement benefits i-e. Gratuity amount of Rs..16,00,000/Commutation amount of Rs.28,6.1,23 2l, E.L., and HpL amount of Rs.1g,71,215/ with roken No2522896664 dt.ogr1ot2o24 and G.p.F., amount of Rs.8,03,387/with roken/cheque No 2523029445 dt-26.0.2024, is iregar, arbitrary, unfair, unjust, discrimination, apart from violation of all the Statutory Rules and constitutronal provisions and consequenfly direct the respondents to release and

¶17

pay above mentior ed^{senefits to the petitionerwith interestp ll4percentper} annum from^{dateof retir:ment to till the date of actual paymentis made}

¶18

IA NO: 10F²⁰²⁵

¶19

PetitionunclerSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircurnstancesstatedin theaffidavitfiledin;upp'ortofthepetition,theHigheourtmaybeplerasedtodirect therespondentsf<rrthr,rlithtoreleaseandpaytheretiremeltbr:nefits-ofthe petitionersuchas,.e.(]ratuityamountofRsl6'00'000/-Comrnutalionamountof Rs.28,61 ,2321-,^{E L,and HPL amountofRs'19'71'2151with Token} No.2522896664^{d..O9l1Ol2O24 and G P F,amount offts B'13'387/-with} Token/Cheque^{No2523029445dl2602024, pending disposalof main writ} petition.

¶20

Counsel for the^{Petitioner:SRI P' UGENDER REDDY}

¶21

Counsel^{for the Respondent Nos'1 to 4: GP FORSERVICES-Ill}

¶22

Counsel for the^{RespondentNo.5:GP FOR SERVICES-l}

¶23

The Court made^{the following: ORDER}

¶24

I I

¶25

/-t

¶26

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVA RAPU RAJ ESHWAR RAO

¶27

RIT P TTON N 5 F

¶28

ORDER

¶29

With the consent of both the parties, this Writ petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage.

¶30

Heard Mr. P. Ugender Reddy, Iearned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government pleader for Services-Ill for respondent Nos.1 to 4, and learned Government Pleader for Services-I for respondent No.5.

¶31

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner retired from service on 30.09.2024 and till now, her retirement benefits were not released by the respondents.

¶32

Learned Government Pleader submits that the bills pertaining to the retirement benefits of the petitioner are already processed. However, due to dearth of funds, the amounts could not be released to the petitioner on time. Learned Government pleader further submits that as per seriatim of the token numbers, amounts will be released to the beneficiaries.

¶33

Having regard to the above submissions; this Writ^petition is disposed of directing the respondents to release and pay the retirement benefits i.€., Gratuity amount of Rs.16,00,000/-,

¶34

Commutation^{amountofRs'28,61'2321-'E'L'andHPLamountof} dated^(r9'10'2024' Rs.L9,7t,2l5l'ryith^{Token No'2522896664'} with^{Tol<en/Cheque} a motlnt^{ofRs'8'03'387/-} and^G.P.F., 26.O.2024,^{pedainingto the per:itioner'} No.2523029445,^dated as expeditiously^{as rossible' preferablywithin a period of ten (10)} weeks^{from the datr: of receipt of a copy of this order' Thelre shall} be no^{order as t') costs'}

¶35

M iscerra^{ne ous petitionspendi ns'''} "'J"]T,1U'{*,rr$, j!r**tf : /rrRuE^coPYI/ ( \u' iiecrrol orrrcEn

¶36

¶37

Finance^{Departments'cxariat' rhe state or}

¶38

I trt,B;,ror*lif'ud"-

¶39

, i$a?iitrfiffi*tffifffiMfl:: services-r'^{High courtforthestatr> of ,eransana' at} : +lltt?,.3];;'' "' HvderabadIOUT] S. ft;ro^{CD CoPies}

TJ BS W

HIGH^COURT

CC TODAY

DATED:1^510412025

ORDER

--'--:
L,i A r(-
(c+
,t P
c5 C)
(., 21 rP?t?5 .b,
t+
-t
:ii ):

¶46

WP.No.11175^{at 2025}

¶47

DISPOSING^{OF THE WRIT PETITION}

¶48

WITHOUT^C:OSTS

¶49

o $,i
')^

M.Amrutha Valli v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Amrutha Valli v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Mohd. Khaja Ahmed Hussain Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

R. Sarayya Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal

T. Jaishankar Vs The State of Telangana

Kaushika Venkataramana Vs The State of Telegana

N. Lincoln Vs The State of Telangana

P. Swaroopa Rani Vs The State of Telangana