Petitioner alleged police interference in his property involved in civil proceedings and inaction on complaints against a police officer. Court noted one complaint closed as civil in nature; disposed of the writ petition directing DCP, South Zone to consider the complaint dated 04.04.2025 as per law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3255 l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Between:
{ohd.Nayeemuddin, S/o. Late Mohd. Nizamuddin, Aged about 5g years, Occ. Business, H.No.22-3-947, Purana Haveli, Hyderaba-d
AND
...PETITIONER
9 J!'," P."p..rtyCommiqs-ionerof pblice, South Zone, Hyderabad.
Respondent No. 6 to I are R/o. H.No.22-3 -g47tc)12, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndih praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS by declaring the action of the official Respondents in interfering in tn" petitioner's land in H.No. 22-3-947-950, Purani Haveti, Hyderabad, which is subject matter of EP No. 195 OF 2024 and not taking action on my compliant dt. 10.03.2025 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents a) not to interfere in the petitioner's H.No. 22-3-947-950, b) by directing the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad to enquire into my complaint and take action against Respondent No.
a
4, cl by directing the official respondents not to interfere in the civil dispute of the petitioner's plot
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 and 3 to furnish the CC camera footages of pS Mirchqwk from 09.03.2025 to 15.03.2025 and personal and official phone recordings from 09.03.2025 to 15.03.2025 pending disposal of the writ petition lA NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Official Respondents not to interfere in the civil disputed H.No. 22-3-947-950, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad and pending disposal of the writ petition lA NO: 3 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to conduct the enquiry on our comptaints dt. 10.03.2025 & 04.04.2025 with not less than the cadre of DCP other than the Hyderabad Commissionarate limits as the Respondent No. 5 is personally involved in the civil disputes and complaint is made against them on 04.04.2025 pending disposal of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt. PASHAM KRISHNA REDDI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to4: AGp FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5to9:--
The Court made {he following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICEN.V.SHRAVANKUMAR of
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for thepetitionerand learnedAssistant Government Pleader forHome appearingfor respondent Nos.L to 4. With their consent, this writpetitionis being takenup for disposal.
\ \
I
2
the police from12 mid-night till 03:30 AM i.e., intervening night of 11.03.2025 and 12.03.2025 and,a reference was made to the complaint dated ro.o3.2o2s.
3
a \
94Trctaladmeasuring187 squareyards situatedat Purani Haveli' Hyderabad andthattheTfrlrespondentishavinginjunctionorders,andthat4ft respondentstatedthat petitionernot to indulgein any unlawful activities in respectof the subject property and to get directions from the competent authority.Later on 11.03.2025, 4th respondentreceived informationthat petitioneralong with his sons and anotherwere creating nuisance at the subjectproperty,while the staff of the 4th resPondent visitedthe spot revealed thatthe petitioner'sson has poured petrot on himself at the instigationof petitionerand other sons, as such the staff of 4th respondenttook them from thespot to prevent the untoward incident but, did not detain them' After completionof enquiries,the 4ft respondent closed the said complaints as ,,Civll in Nature" on19.03.2025and the same has beeninformed to the petitioner/complainantas well as to 7t:. respondentthroughPetition ManagementSystemas wellas throughpost'
4
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed_ No
order as to costs.
SD/-T. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6
//TRUE COPY//
SECT]ON OFFICER
To,
N,gY
HIGH COURT
DATED:0311112025
=.t
WP.No.11015 of 2025
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION HOUT COSTS
(
I
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the police interference in the petitioner's land, subject of E.P.No.195 of 2024, and non-action on his complaint dated 04.04.2025 was illegal?
Whether the authorities should be directed to consider and act upon the petitioner's pending complaint?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Nayeemuddin, S/o. Late Mohd. Nizamuddin
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department
The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad
Deputy Commissioner of Police, South Zone, Hyderabad
The Station House Officer, P.S. Mirchowk
Rachakonda Ravinder
N.V. Shravan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
