Dismissed¶39

Bandala Yadagiri v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC11 Feb 2025WP/10643/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Procedural dismissal: 2017 Telangana writ petition (Art. 226, certiorari against order G/3221/2015 dated 21-03-2016 of the 3rd respondent, Suryapet; Act No. 56 of 2007 referenced) dismissed for non-prosecution on 11-02-2025 by Justice Surepalli Nanda after repeated non-representation (06.01.2025, 04.02.2025, 11.02.2025). Interlocutory orders: IA No.1/WPMP 13196 of 2017 (suspension of impugned order, S.151 CPC); IA No.2/WPMP 14889 of 2017 (impleader of proposed 5th respondent, S.151 CPC). No precedents cited; no substantive holding. Relevant to non-prosecution dismissal practice, not to the merits of the underlying order.

What did the court decide?

No relief to the petitioner; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution without costs; miscellaneous petitions pending in the writ petition closed. ¶39

Bandala Yadagiri Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^32s21

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELAN.GANAAT HYDERABAD} (Special Original^{Jurisdictiorl)}

¶3

TUESDAY,^{THE ELEVENTHDAYOF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND^{ANDTWENTYFIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{MRSJUSTICESUREPALLI NANDA}

¶6

WRIT PETITIO^{NNO:1 0643 0F 2017}

¶7

"""il,yf9itr^gl";8,)5.;:1g,figft'.i'f:letilffift^{y"l,i"i:tNo'e'D'l'ro'S-} 3-49, Gouthami^Nagz

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

1 I::":13:?,?:|.',i'3x,t"xltr[r?Bi-'r','.',fi#?Be' iJrLilrni^{s""retariat,HYderabad'}

¶11

The District^{Collector,and Appellate Tribunal Suryapet District Suryapet'} ""en"J?'Ho ' 3fJ?S$??1"31

¶12

2 3 The Persons Nourishment Revenue^{Divisional- ano Officer til"iilL"iiii'nal' and' Chairman-of Parents suryapet' suryapet and Old District'Age}

¶13

4 Bandla Biksham,^{S/o-Veeraiah,age!.qbgyt 70 years,Rl/o.Seetharampuram'} " ff;;;iG;tEm'ruinoat' Nalsonda^District'

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition^{underArticle226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filedtherewith'the High Court may be} pleased to issue^{an appropriate writ order or directionmore particularly in the} nature of^{writ of certiorari calingfor the records of the order bearing} No.Gt3221t2O15^{dated21-03-2}16on the file of the 3rd respondentto set aside} the same^{by declaring the same is arbitrary, iflegal, capricious and violative of} provisons of Act^{No.56of 2OO7 and the Rules madethere under'}

¶16

l.A. NO:1 OF^{2017(wPMP.NO:13196oF 201 7)}

¶17

petition under section^{151 Cpc prayingthat in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit^{fired in supportof the petition,the High courtmaybe pleasedto}

¶18

i l I

¶19

suspend the rperetion of order bearing No.Gr3221/2015 dated 1 .1-03-2016 0f the

¶20

3rd respondent he .ein pending disposal of the above Writ pr:titio n

¶21

l.A. NOi 20F 2Ct17 P MP. NO: 148890F 2017

¶22

Between:

¶23

r N o e, D No 5. 8.Xt:i: I J f, : n? ft ,3i?: ?l?l]1[1; g;li'-.S # {.ff., Sfi ,.: i

¶24

AND

¶25

...PETITIONER

¶26

i!ffi |fri}Ul"E.fi}ilfu L.#;y,i:.,f,#"JBa,,::iJ:,8fr ,J?,".,?S#:H"si

¶27

2 The District Ckrl[s61er, and Appellate Tribunal Suryapet District t]uryapet. 3 4. I!:.#:'fl i;,ll*"":i:;l ffi;il i+t,g:5lt?:,31 53,;JJr;t fllg.3Jd As"

¶28

70 yea rs, Rro se el ha ra mpuram,

¶29

A 3#fJ?d.$i;XB X ^ffiyffi il,?3"S,,l3i. ,g""E:f l,1tbn33uo1.,#"1^{ru",., Rr/o se -.tharampuram,}

¶30

.,t Uru}e;ffi " :

¶31

...R[:SipONDENTS

¶32

petition under Section 1S1 CpC praying that in the circumsit:tnces stated in the affidavit filed ir r;upport of the petition, the Hi gh Court rnay r)o pleased to implead the abo ve nanred Sth respondent as 5th Re spondent n th,: writ petition as well as in WpVt) ir \V.p.No.106 43 of 2011.

¶33

Counsel for the pertitiorrer: SRI SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTy 1ruor eneset4 COUNSCI fOr thE REr;PC,NdENt NO.1 tO 3: GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE The Court made th€! foll,owing: ORDER

¶34

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE^{SUREPALLI NANDA}

¶35

WRIT PETITION^{No.1O643of 2()17}

¶36

ORDER:

¶37

No representation on^{behalf of the petitioner when the} case is called on 06.01.2025^{and on 04.02.2025'Thoughthe} matter is listed under^{the caption for dismissal on lt'02'2o25,} yet, there is no representation^{on behalf of the petitioner when} the case is called.

¶38