Dismissed¶31

My Cafe Latte v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC21 Apr 2025WP/10236/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, W.P. No. 10236 of 2025, T. Vinod Kumar J., order dated 21-04-2025: hookah-serving restaurant/coffee shop 'My Cafe Latte' (Manikonda, Ranga Reddy District) challenged alleged ban by Raidurgam SHO and ACP Madhapur citing COTP Act; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue remedies in law; Section 151 CPC interim application closed; no merits adjudicated; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to avail remedies open to it in law; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed. ¶31

My Cafe Latte Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁶ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT I{YDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 10236 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Vy^C.r[:" lrrQ, F."p.^{by its Owner,Sri. Annapureddy MadhusudhanaReddy,} S/o. A Pulla Reddy, aged about 44 years, Oci- Business, Rl/o. plot No. 53/5a, Terrace, Manikonda, Near Ghanshyam Super Market, Manikonda (Jagir), Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy Distriit.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Principal Secretary (Home) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶12

2 The Cyberabad Commissionarate, Gachibowli, Hyderabad.

¶13

J The Station House Officer, Raidurgam Police Station, Raidurgam, Hyderabad. 4 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Madhapur, Cyberabad police Commissionarate, Telangana State.

¶14

5 9OT,^{Raidurgam, Madhapur Police Division,Cyberabadpolice} Commissionerate.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent no.3 and 4 herein for interfering and imposing ban on the business of the petitioner running under the name and style as My Cafe Latte situated at Plot No. 53/54, Terrace, Manikonda, Near Ghanshyam Super Mar:ket, Manikonda (Jagir), Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy District in serving of flavored Hookahs as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of COTP Act and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue the

¶17

business of servingl f ,vored Hookahs in the petitioners Restaur;lnt and coffee Shop without any l- ir c rance or restrictions, in the interest of jus:iict,:.

¶18

1A NO: 1 OF 2025

¶19

Petition un'l,rr lection^'151 cpc praying that in the circunrstances stated in the affidavit filed i :;upport of the writ petition, the High court rray be pleased to direct the responc ..,nts more pa(icularly respondent no. 3 arrd 4 herein'not to interfere with the Re taurant and coffee shop business of the petitioner running under the name ancl s,lyle as My cafe Latte situated at plot No [)3/54, Terrace, Manikonda, Near 3h rnshyam Super Market, Manikonda (Jagir), Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy Dis;t'r t in serving fravored Hookahs to his custorners, pending disposal of the pre,se r writ petition.

¶20

Counsel for the Perit oner: SMT K.PALLAVI

¶21

Counsel for the Rer;p ondents: Gp FOR HOME

¶22

The Court made the I lllowing: ORDER

¶23

¶24

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.^{VINOD KUMAR}

¶25

WRIT PETITION No.lO236 of 2o25

¶26