Disposed¶28

M. Yugendar Reddy S/o. Venkat Reddy, v. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal

Telangana HC11 Aug 2025WP/10227/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pahani 1426 Fasli (2016); deletion of petitioner's name in pattedar and possessor columns; entry as open land belonging to Government; Ac. 1-20 gts.; Sy. No. 132/l; Garepally Village; Kataram Mandal; Jayashankar Bhoopalapally District; A.P. Rights in Land and Pattedar Passbooks Act, 1971; Articles 14, 15, 21, 300-A; Article 226 mandamus; writ petition closed as covered by W.P. No. 1601 of 2019 (allowed 18.10.2023); no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; Justice K. Sarath.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; writ petition closed with no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed. ¶28

M. Yugendar Reddy S/o. Venkat Reddy, Vs The State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰² ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH^{DAY OF AUGUST} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH}

¶6

WRIT PETITIO^{N NO: 10227 OF 2017}

¶7

Between:

¶8

M.YugendarReddyS/o.VenkatReddy,aged.40years'Occ;Agriculture'R'/o' Garepilli Village,^{Ka-taramMandal, KarimnagarDistrict.}

¶9

.....PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 . The State of Telangana,^{represented by its Principal, Secretaryto the} Revenue Departmdnt,^{Secietariat Buildings, Hyderabad'}

¶12

The District collector,^{Jayashankar Bhoopalapally District, Bhoopalapally.}

¶13

The Tahsildar, Kataram^{Mandal, Kataram, Karimnagar District'}

¶14

Smt. P. Madhavi, Tahsildar,^{Katarama Mandal, Kataram,, KarimnagarDistrict.}

¶15

.....RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition Under Article^{226 ot lhe constitution of lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavit filed therewith, the High court maybe} pleased to issue an order or direction^{more particularly one in the nature of writ of} mandamus or any other appropriate^{writdeclaringthe actionof the respondents} no.3and4indeletingthenameofthepetitionerinthepahanioftheyearl426 fasli (2016) in^{pattedarand possessor columnsand entering it as open land} belongtogovernmentinregardingwiththelandanextentofAc.l-20gts.,in sy.no.l32ilsituatedatGarepallyVillageofKataramMandalofJayashankar Bhoopalapally District,^{abusingthe powers vested in him without followingthe} procedure as laid down under A.P.^{Rightsin Landand Pattedar PassbooksAct,} 1971 and the rules framed^{there under,without issuingany noticeto the} petitioner, is nothing but illegal,^{arbitrary, null and void and violativeof principles}

¶17

of natural^justice and also violative of Articles 14, 15,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia. Consequently, direct the responrlent no.2 to conduct an enquiry against the illegleal acts of the respondents no.3 and 4 deleting the name of the petitioner in the pahani of the year 1426 fasli (2C'16) in regarding with his land admeasuring Ac. 1-20 gts., in sy.no.132ll situate,l at Garepally Village of Kataram Mandal of Jayashankar Bhoopalapally District, and entering as open land belong to government, and appropriate action may te taken.

¶18

!.A.NO:1 OF 2017^{(WPMP.NO:12670} OF 20'l7l

¶19

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in thr:^{()ircumstances} stated in the affidavit filecl in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the entry in pahani of the year 1426'fasli (2016) the entry as open land belong to government in pattedar and possessor column:; in regarding with the land admeasuring Ac. 1-20 gts., in Sy. No.^'13211 situated at Garepally Village of Kataram Mandal of Jayashankar Bhoopalapally District, thereby continue the name of the petitioenr as pattedar and possessor of the and admeasuring Ac.^'1 - 20 gts., in Sy. No. 13211 situated at Garepally Village^,rf Kataram Mandal of Jayashankar Bhoopalapally District.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K.VENUMADHAV

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR REVENTJE

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : --

¶23

The Court made the following ORDER

¶24

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^K.SARATH

¶25

WRIT PEf,ITION^{No.LO227of 2Ol7}

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

Learned Counsel for the^{petitioner submits that} after hling this writ^{petition,the petitionerhas filed} W.P.No.16O1 of 2019 and^{the same was allowedon} Ig.lO.2O23 and in view of^{the same, no orders are} necessary to be^{passedin this writ petition.}

¶28