Disposed

The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C (Now Tsrtc) v. P.Ravi Prasad

Telangana HC11 Mar 2025WA/438/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ appeal by TSRTC against an order in a writ petition concerning an ex-conductor was settled in the Lok Adalat held by the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana on 14.12.2024. The appeal was disposed of in terms of the Lok Adalat Award; pending interlocutory applications were closed. No costs.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of in terms of the Lok Adalat Award dated 14.12.2024 without costs; pending applications closed.

The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C (Now Tsrtc)… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

t^3446l

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH^{DAYOF MARCH} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYFIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE THE^{ACTINGGHIEFJUSTICE SUJOY PAUL} AND THE HONOURABLE SMT^{JUSTICE RENUKA YARA}

¶6

WRITAPPEAL NO: 438^{OF 2019}

¶7

writ Appeal under clause^{'15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order} dated 23t1112O18^{in WP NO. 2O191OF 2003. on the file of the High Court'}

¶8

Between:

¶9

The Depot Manager,^{A.P.S.R.T.C (Now TSRTC), Jagityal Depot, Karimnagar} District

¶10

...APPELLANT

¶11

AND

¶12

1 P.Ravi Prasad, S/o^{Narasaiah, Aged about 55 years, Ex-Conductor,E NO-} 72'184, Rio 1-3-210, Jagatiyal ,^{KarimnagarDistrict.}

¶13

2 The lndustrial Tribunal-cum-labour^{Court, Rep by its Chairman'} Godavarikhani, Karimnagar^District.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

lA NO: 2 OF 2019

¶16

Petition under section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition, the High Court maybe pleased to} suspend the orders^{passed in W.P.No.20191 of 2003 dl'23'11'2018pending} disposal of writ apPeal.

¶17

Counsel for the^{Appellant:SRI GADDAM SRINIVAS (SC FORTSRTC)}

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.1: SRI A. K' JAYAPRAKASHRAO}

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.2: GP FOR LABOUR}

¶20

The Court made the^{following:JUDGMENT}

¶21

¶22

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL

¶23

AND

¶24

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA

¶25

WRTT APPEAL No.438 of 2Ol9

¶26

JUDGMENT: (per the Hon,bte the Acting Chief Justice Sujog paut)

¶27

The disF,ute in this appeal has been set,ed in the Lok Adalat on 14.12.2024 held by the High Court Legal Serrrices Committee for the State of Telalgana, Hyderabad.

¶28

AccordinlJly, this appeat is disposed of in terrns of the Award rendererl by the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telrlngana, Hyderabad.

¶29

Interiocutcry applications, if any pending, shall also stand

¶30

closed.

¶31

SD/-I.NAGALAKSHMI
r\EPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPYII

tJsEcfloN oFFtcER

To,

The Chairman, l'he lndustrial Tri bu na l-cu m-la bou r Court, Godavarikhani, Kanmnaqar Distr ct.

¶36

?. 9n"^{CCio Sri Gaddam} Srinivas (SC for TSRTC) l,OpUCr

¶37

1. One CC to Sri A. K. Jayaprakash Rao, Advocate tOpUCl'

¶38

1. L*q CC to The Gp for Labour, Hi Hyderabad[OUT] gh Court for the State of Telangana, at

¶39

1. Two CD Copies

¶40

TJ LS (t

--1

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 110312025

1t ,.e E iIir,e
/
!,,Y
i,;lil--- [B [P$ 2$6 o
r1i,\l (,)
r
D r ri PA1 L-'

¶46

JUDGMENT

¶47

WA.No.438 of 2019

¶48

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WTHOUT COSTS t^I

¶49

JtI^3)t

The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C (Now Tsrtc) v. P.Ravi Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C (Now Tsrtc) v. P.Ravi Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Kausalya Infra Projects Private Limited. Vs State of Telangana

Aisha Sultana Lodhi Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Dynere Engineering Private Limited. Vs The State of Telangana

Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Vs The Industrial Tribunal II

M/s. Al-Arif Milk Center Vs The State of Telangana

P.L.N. Rao Vs The Union of India