Dismissed¶29

Mohammed Moudood Ali v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC11 Jul 2025TRCRLP/19/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Transfer Criminal Petition TRCRLP.No.19 of 2022; Section 407 Criminal Procedure Code; transfer of C.C. No.369 of 2021; Judicial First Class Magistrate cum Junior Civil Judge, Achampet, Nagarkurnool District; Siddapur Police Station; State of Telangana; petitioner Mohammed Moudood Ali S/o Sofi Ali; counsel S. Mohd Abdul Raheem Khan; dismissed for non-prosecution; no representation by petitioner's counsel on 09.07.2025 and 11.07.2025 (listed 'for dismissal'); miscellaneous applications closed including impleadment application under Section 151 CPC for defacto complainant Manthati Cnanora Shekar; Telangana High Court; Justice J. Sreenivas Rao; dated 11-07-2025; no merits adjudication; no case law cited.

What did the court decide?

The Transfer Criminal Petition No.19 of 2022 is dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶29

Mohammed Moudood Ali Vs State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

[³³⁰³¹

i I i ! t I 1

1 I I i I

I t I I I i t I ! I I ] I t i I I i

¶5

HIGH^{COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD}

¶6

,iT,VO FRIDAY ,THE^{ELEVENTHDAY OF JULY} THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYFIVE}

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICE J SREENIVASRAO}

¶9

TRANSFE R CRIMI^{NAL PET} ITION NO:19 oF 2022

¶10

Between:

¶11

tVlohammed^{MoudoodAli S/o Sofi Ali' fSe^A sz ye-ars Occupation} Private Service, R/o^{H. No 23-1 -41; h, irii'rt ri'ti'] cnarminar'Hvderabad}

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

'1 . State of Telangana' Represented^{by Public Prosecutor High Court'} HYderabad.

¶15

The^{StationHouseOfficer' Siddapur Police Station' Nagarkurnool District'} T.S,.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

PetitionfiledunderSec.4OTofCriminalProcedureCodeprayingthatinthe circumstances^{stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof TransferCriminal} Petition,^{the High Court maybe pleased to transfer C C No 369 of 2021' pending} on the^{file of the Judicial First ClassMagistrateCum JuniorCivil Judge at} AchamPet,^{NgarkurnoolDistrict'}

¶18

l.A. NO: 10^{F 2022}

¶19

Petition^{under Section 407 (6) CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated} in the affidavit^{filed in support of the petition' the High Court maybe pleased to} stay all further^{proceedingsincluding dispensewith the appearanceof} Petitioner/AccusedinC.C.No.36gof2O2l,pendingonthefileofHon.bleJudicial First class^{Magistratecum Junior civil Judge at Achampet,Ngarkurnool'T'S '} pending disposal of^{the transferpetition}

¶20

t.A. NO : 10F 2025

¶21

Petition under section 1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to implead the defacto complainant sri.Manthati cnanora shekar as respondent no.3 in TR.CRLp.No.19 of 2022

¶22

This^petition comin upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar ,.,,;:^^"i-t:'.hearing or sri s MoHD ABDUL RAHEEM Yasar ^r^*,^{1.1:;:"::T':""ff:Yi":"} Mamoon' the Additionar pubric prosecutor on beharr "rT: il:r:i:sved

¶23

Counsel for the petitioner: SRI. S MOHD ABDUL RAHEEM KHAN Counsel for the Respondents: pUBLIG PROSECUTOR (TG) The Court made the following: ORDER

¶24

._a -rta--

¶25

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO

¶26

TRANSFER CRIMINAL PETITION No.L9 of 2022

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

When the matter u,as taken up for hearing on O9.O7.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. To give one opportunity, the matter was posted to 71.O7.2025 under the caption 'for dismissal'. In spite of the matter being listed^{underthe caption'for} dismissal', today also, there is no reprcsentation on behalf of the petitioner, either physically or virtually. It appears that the^petitioner is not having any interest to prosecute the matter.

¶29