Allowed

Mekala Kaveri @ Dobbala Ruchitha v. Mekala Rajender

Transfer of matrimonial proceedings – Section 24 CPC

Telangana HC16 Sept 2025TRCMP/166/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Wife sought transfer of matrimonial proceedings (F.C.O.P.No.110 of 2024) from Nizamabad to Sircilla citing her convenience. No one appeared for respondents despite notice. Relying on settled Supreme Court principles favouring the wife's convenience in transfer of matrimonial cases, the Court allowed the petition and transferred the case.

What did the court decide?

F.C.O.P.No.110 of 2024 transferred from District Family Judge, Nizamabad to District Court at Sircilla; record to be transmitted within one month; no costs.

Mekala Kaveri @ Dobbala Ruchitha Vs Mekala Rajender — Matrimonial and Divorce | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

ry 134121

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA

¶6

TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 166 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Mekala Kaveri @ Dobbala Ruchitha, W/o Mekal Rajender, D/o Dobbala Sanjeev, Age 28years, Occ Housewife, R/o H N.10-3-337, Shivajinagar, Nizambad District, Presently residing at Suddala Village, Konararaopet Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District.

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

Mekala Rajender, S/o Rajaiah, Age 35 years, Occ Daily WagerMorker, R/o H.No.10-3-337, Shivajinagar Mandal, Nizamabad District.

¶12

Yenuganti Ramesh, S/o Sudershan, Age 33 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o. H.No.'1-441312, Pacchalla Narkuda Village, Velpur Mandal, Nizamabad District.

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

Petition Under Section 24 ol lhe C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased to transfer the F.C.O.P.No.110 of 2024 in the Court of District Family Judge, at Nizamabad to District Court at Siricilla

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in F.C.O P.No.110 of 2024 in the Court of District Family Judge, at Nizamabad pending disposal of above Tr.CMP.

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.GlRl KRISHNA

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

I'HE HONOI.'ITABLE SNTI".'LiS-IICE RE\T^K <sup>Y TIT,</sup>

¶21

Tr.C.M.P.No.l 66 of 2025

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

l leard Sr.i P. Giri Krishna,^{leamedcounsel tbr thc} 1'rttitioncr.^{Itr spite of} scrvice ol' noticc. none^altpeared and^{there is no rcpt t-'sclltatioll fol' the} respoudents. Pctused thc cntire^lecold.

¶24

This petition is filed by^{the petitionerseeking trarrsl.'olF.('.O t']No'll0} ot' 2024 pcnding on thc- tilc of^{the DistrictFarnily JLrdgcrrt \izanrabadto the} District⁽ oLrrt at Silicilla.

¶25

-i Sincc thcre al'e catena^{of judgments of the Flon'bl. Suprcinc ('ortrt ttr} consider tlri' convetrietrce o1- u,ife while transtbrtins inlr li,'rs ai isitlg out ol nratrir.r.ronial disputes. keeping in view^{o1- the conretticlt,c oi' tlte pctit oner} herein, thc leliefpraved lbr is^granted.

¶26

In rhe result. the lranst-er Civil Miscellaneous^{Petitiortis allou'edancl the} f.C.0.l'].No.ll0 ol l0ll^pending on the llle ol^{the I)isl:reLI-':.r,-rilr .lLrdge at} Nizarnabad is $,ithdt'au n and transferred to^{the District ('o rtt at Siricilla'lhe} cnrire origlinal rcc,rrcl shrll be transmitled^{rvithina peri<td ,, !)llc'lrtonth.i ilere} shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous^{Petitiols. il .irri. perlclirrg in this}

¶27

appeal, shall stand close(l

¶28

SD/-.{. JAYASREE ,\S$S'I'ANT^RI'(;ISTRAR \ \ //TRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFTCER

¶29

To,

¶30

The Distict^{Family Judge' at Nizamabad}

2.TheDistrict^{Court atSircilla.}
3OneCCto^{SRIP GlRlKRISHNA, Advocate [OPUC]}
4.Two CDCoPies
NVB/PSL Yt

HIGH COURT

DATED:1610912025

ORDER

-'_."-:s-
'.
(.. ,
li
lr ') i g $tl ?$fi .-'li
.'
'r)t:;,.. ,, "')-/* ;:;-r: :--i-:- - --r---

¶40

TRCMP.No.166 of 202i

¶41

ALLOWING THE TR.C.M.P

¶42

G.4*/t
$,.-

Mekala Kaveri @ Dobbala Ruchitha v. Mekala Rajender

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mekala Kaveri @ Dobbala Ruchitha v. Mekala Rajender

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Srinath Spinners Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Srinath Spinners Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Srinath Spinners Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana

Mr. Bobba Nagender Reddy Vs Bobba Aravinda Reddy

Smt. Kamalapuram Shreshta Vs Alpuri Dheeraj

Shabbir Harron Vs the Special Director (Appeals)