Husband and wife settled their matrimonial dispute through mediation before the High Court Legal Services Committee. Since the appeal had not been heard on merits, the court declined to itself dissolve the marriage and permitted the parties to approach the Family Court on the basis of the settlement affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:f
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND rWeNry rrve
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA And THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
FAMILY COURTAPPEAL NO: 202 OF 2023
Appeal Under Section 19 of the Family Court Act against the Order and Decree dated 10-10-2023 passed in FCOP No. '178 ol 2021 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Additional Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.
Between:
Gamidi Sindhu Madhavi,, D/o. Sri Ayodhya Rama Rao, Wo. Sri Z. Prabhakar, Age. 33 years. Occ. Primary School Teacher, R/o. H.No. 4-12-79312, Dwarakamayinagar, Beside Saibaba Temple, Vanasthalipuram, Hayathnagar, Hyderabad, Ranlareddy District, (T,S) ...APPELLANT/ Petitioner
AND
Sri Zaddu Prabhakar, S/o. Sri Venkateswara Rao, Aged.36 years, Occ. Senior Technical Assistant B, SFDR Project, DRDL, Kanchan Bagh, Hyderabad -500 058. (T S ) ...RESPONDENT/ Respondent
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to consider the request of the petitioner herein in permitting him to have temporary custody of the child on every second Saturday, Sundays, public holidays/festivals, permit the minor child to attend family rituals,
lA NO:4 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to modify order in lA No. 212024 in FCA No. 20212023 dt. 06-08-2024 pending before the Hon'ble High Court of Telangana only to the extent for the change of place of venue for visitation as "Mediation Centre, High Court of Telangana" instead of "PVR Cinemas, Musaramgagh Hyderabad".
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. NAGESWARA RAO REPAKULA
Counsel forthe Respondent: Ms. B. KAVITA YADAV The Court delivered the following Judgment :
I I
\ t
THE IICIN'BLE JUSTICE MOUSIIUMI BHATTACIIARYA AND THE TION'BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
F/TMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 202 0F 2023
Mr.Nageswara Ilac Repakula, learned counsel appearing for the appellant Ms. B Kavita Yarlar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent (Orrline)
JUDGMENT: (J,r:r Hon'ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)
Both parties are present in Court
2
Interim orders, ifany, shall standvacated' Thereshalibe no
order as to costs.
Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
I
S CTION OFFICER
To
1.Th.e. Judge, Additional Famity Court , Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. (with records)
, 2. One CC to SRt. NAGESWARA RAO REPAKULA Advocate IOPUCI
[Alongwith a copy ofthe medication Report] ku[/nskw
I '
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410312025
JUDGMENT
FCA.No.202 of 2023
3 thL ST4 r4
o
,I)
o(
i" 26 'iAIj 2025
t
-t. .: s j-,.
DISPOSING OF THE Ir(].{ WITHOUT COSTS
,
l6 b a5
EFffiH-
l
l
t-.
I
i
{
ffi
MEDIATIONCENTRE
HIGH COURTLEGALSERVICESCOMMITTEE FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA 3rd ftoor,Nyayaseva Sadan, Near NagaDevataTemPle' Gate No.2, HighCourtPremises, Hyderabad- 500 066'
ROC.No.166/HCMCl2074
From Co-ordinator, MediationCentre, High CourtLegat ServicesCommittee, Hyderabad.
Date: 03'03-2025
To The Registrar(Judiciat- l), Hon'bte HighCourt for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad.
Sir,
Sub:Mediation Centre,High Court Legal ServicesCommittee- Mediation in iCa N".zozof 2023 on the fite of the Hon'bteHighcourt for the State ofTetangana -submissionof Report - Regarding'
VideOrderreferredabove,lamtostatethattheHon'bteHighCourtfortheStateof TetanganareferredFCANo.202of20T3forMediationandasdirected,SriChattaKodandaram' RetiredJudge,HighcourtforthestateofTelangana,conductedmediationproceedingsand submittedthe report stating thatMediationis "Successful"'
I am herewithsubmittingthe Mediator'sreport in FCANo'202of 2023atongwith
MemorandumofSetttementwitharequesttoplacethesamebeforetheHon'bteDivisionBenchof the Court.
Yours faithfuttY' H'S.^^EJV s\a>{
Co-ordinator MediationCentre, Hish CourtLegatServices Committee, HYderabad.
Enct: MediationReport atongwithMemorandumof Settlement'
) i i
ii ii )) 1 !.
ll il )i tl
q Sear:h .Eil
EJ
@S*;::@
10
MeJiation Report - FCA2)2of 2023 r.i",,
6u
Stared
JLst :r) Cha a Kodanda Ram
o Sh tiar2,512pH it! hcuF -q.)
Sent
Drafts ?t l.. :-. (rl hr rlr Hm.brc lusd.. a_hiL Roard_r), F.roer Jungc, Hrgt. ( ir.. . i n l? .S2nr ri,. r.f { oa nrcd, r ron 6 cn.l.3.d
r.i!'f,,, ;rllnongfi.seebe6rerh.Honl,t.Highc.rr joriheSn:.oa.t.lIglD
pI o N
ANDHRA PRADESH oFIrc I oF CFjlL * BE LE E0
AP STAIE AUTHORITY JUST]CE CH LLA XOD-|\DA,IL{.I1 tRc,dt 3,!
llor N , 6s i Roed No 71 I
.IELANGANAAUTHORIIY-- ('l
IuLil* Hixs I Hydcabad I :i l,1AB 2O''
c, )
- 6a-xv
Labels
ANDHRA PRADESH AP STAIE AUTHORITY .. .IELANGANAAUTHORIIY--
9,o^
-6f6/Ad{
r,rlll I
INTHE MATTEROF MEDIATION IN FCANo'2c,2c,F20.23
'J#lll*"r, Tf.HT; w/o srizt' Prab,,avar'
*J"}*s#ffi,rcm1"''
. ..Petidoner
...ResPondent
ixe*-t**;'.
5 AccordintJ-. the mediatjon .:ett.lernent clated I 1.J 1.2O2_ report along with the Court. 4 whjch ,""r';';;Je
\4emorandurn or efore the Hon trle
SIIRI JUSTICE CHALLA I(ODAIYDARAII.I FORMERJUDGE TELANGANA HIGH COURT (MEDTAToR)
onsr15 I ts drY of l.terflg"r(ldrri oI S€rtefi€nf t n,ad" andorcruted .2Ol4 bv rrd beGiEsr: PrabtuklrAgc: 33
PrabtuklrAgc: 33
ShdurFLdEYl,D/o. 5rl Ayodqtr F.ts,Occ:Prlnury Sdml Te.dter. B€dfrSaEabaTecde, callgd ac tt DsaEE frs)'frs)'
DsaEE frs)'frs)' ocf:Sanlor :36 sr! Z.ddu s/o. $l R o,Ag"d -500 Tedlni(alOfficer'A',SFOfl' p8o{, XandPn O.s.).hednafbr partV. cltl 2d Frty$r&s WHEREASilt€ h betqrctrrf PartYadl N€ar of 2!dparty8N. kl Hlndu 23-0F20f4at the reCdoce trtandaLKrt$na D{stlctuperthe rlEs and drtfte eld $eYaEon 16The sHflrafiiage r!'as No.598 L7445andcustodYof la Ucssedtt{th a bYbaby named as 6+015.th€boYls rPvtaged abos9 fteisarrd he E in $e care p.Ity. figlm,pw"ffiH,EH'3 "",ilJ-rlrffi;-
i
I
I
I
l
I
:,H:ffi,ffffi ffffi;ffi# 2023 whldrb pa6hg'
IEnlui*r'D COilDmoNs
,#
ffii#;,,", ffi r,#rft,Hl*,rr?nffi .;lffi ffi#"7
g
ffiffifl,H,
.against to party rs al the dalmsarc setfledln TOTO.
In vfetrr of the seuement fie FCA No.202 of 2023 fitedoytrtg 1lP'1ry^:Y,f sffi'Htffffi:ii;,f,$xr-?+1';;6,-rit'm,-fft#il* party fdlb to comply witrr the above terms and conditiol rernedy avallable b ttrem.
i ,J I l 1
t:, ,
, h portv.ru dlc drlu(,n cornnnrnicateh ucpartlcsstufl ffmmr chlu rrrudl
anY
mlno. bof bT nrmc (furthor No, s98I 744s 8399) E at lsall aqedE€ [bout 9yc.rt ts tn thce6rc ontY UUt€ child E tnt!.!tthe cun vtrlt he to bqh ln hrmhdp bcncllt of $re dlild tohlve the dlM h hwc smngmtn&etrnd for $,h|ft 6r. 1r p6rtyshallcmPSat€ td€ably.
' iri"t.,fi-finh seviffiiiii. i " gi,,#'ffitl'irmff=1# ;iltl&fr,rsr,"a-ra fiil;tim irotu'"ptuce dvtsiture parues shallhave tonrteraUqrln wtratapp-Eoup tlfUOc oeatenW $." 2" party for the purpose ruffid;,;up"drhiis d t't @ bv name zaddut'lokstusnamV'
,c
I +)I
ffirm#*r.fu,ffi;xffiffi"#
t) L-fu;, z) s "s'1"9
Art''{L
ans* panrv
seouo PARW
!
!i
tO
flr,l;,ffi ruffixd.fu1ry;ffi ffi
wtnrcs"s:
r) 1rr; 2) d ut,T' *
A,,JL
FIRS+ pAnry
SE@{D PARW
IN THE HIGHCOURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI
MOTOR ACCIDENTCIVIL MISCE LLANEOUSAPPEALNO:57 1oF 2022
Between:
Reliance Generallnsurance Co'Ltd,BranchOffice' H'No 11-25-131' 13111and 131/2. SSSpraza, rr,r.cliil"aolwj'i''"gil,R"p' ov is Legal Manager'H No4-1- iii't.i e-37.,ith Ftoor.sagarPlaza,Abids, Hyderabad'
'..APPELLANT'RESPONDENTNo'3
AND
RESPONDENT/PETITION/APPELLANT
...RESPONDENTS
AppealfiledunderSection,lT3ofMotorvehiclesAct.'againsttheJudgment and decree,madein ftf .V.O p fl" f Og6 of 20l6'date.d 31 03 2022 on the file of the -Tribunal-cum- Vlll Additional "District Judge' chairman,Motor AccideniCf"irt JayashankarBhuPalPallY.
This appeal comingon for hearing and upon.perusingthe grounds of appeal' the Judgmentand Decree "iti," otC"rrt Snr'6etow fOftronDlanOthe AJAY material oapers KUMAi' Advocate in the MVOPfor the and uponhearing the "rg,,";it ;;"il;l "";;i"snrcrisinsHl BHUSHAN'counselforthe Respondents'
This Courtdoth Order and Decreeas follows:
Sd/. K AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII
i.. \
SEcTIoN oFFIcER
To
B
HIGH COURI' DATED: 1210',2t2025
DECREE MACMA.N o.5',t1 ot 2022
l?
t s 1.r, ,-6-
1(di-"
ti
2 6 Nnn zaz;
+
.!.._.r;, '-iqi1
ALLOWED.IN.PART @H* %#
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the family court appeal for dissolution of marriage could be disposed of in terms of the parties' settlement arrived at in mediation.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Gamidi Sindhu Madhavi
Zaddu Prabhakar
Moushumi Bhattacharya
B.R. Madhusudhan Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
