The General Manager v. burugupally Pentavva
Case brief
What is this about?
Withdrawal-based dismissal order; carries no adjudicative weight and is not citable for any proposition of law. Identifiers: MACMA/MACMA.No.2505 of 2013; decided 17.02.2025 by Smt. Justice M.G. Priyadarsini, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. Appellant: General Manager, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd (Policy No.100 19355). Respondents: Smt. Burugupally Pentavua, Sri Burugupally Rajaiah, Smt Burugupally Renuka, Master Burugupally Ramulu (claimants) and Sri K Mallesham (owner of offending auto AP 24 N 9332). Challenged decision: judgment and decree dated 27.11.2012 in MVOP.No.46 of 2009, MACT-cum-IV Additional District Judge (FAC), Siddipet. Statute: Section 173, Motor Vehicles Act. Counsel: N Mohan Krishna (insurer/appellant); Palle Sriharinath (respondents). Disposition: permission to withdraw accorded; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.