Dismissed¶27

Smt. Laxmi Bai v. The Income Tax Officer

Telangana HC6 Aug 2025ITTA/430/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, ITTA No.430 of 2010, decided 06-08-2025; Smt. Laxrhi Bai v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-10(3), Hyderabad; appeal against ITAT Hyderabad B-Bench order dated 11-09-2009 in ITA No.1279/Hyd/2008; dismissed for want of prosecution on appellant counsel's (Ms. Sagarika Koneru for Mr. Y. Ratnakar) submission; liberty to revive reserved; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; no merits or legal issue decided; bench P. Sam Koshy and Suddala Chalapathi Rao, JJ.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution at the instance of the appellant's own counsel, with liberty reserved to the appellant to revive the appeal if still aggrieved by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order; no costs; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed. ¶27

Smt. Laxmi Bai Vs The Income Tax Officer — Income Tax | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^348e ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶3

AT HYOERABAD

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

¶7

INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 430 OF 2010

¶8

Appeal under Section 2604 of the Income Tax Act against the order dated 11-09-2009 in lTA.No.1279lHyd/2008 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellale Tribunal, B-Bench, Hyderabad.

¶9

Between:

¶10

Smt. Laxrhi Bai, 3-4-305, Tobacco Bazar Secunderabad

¶11

...APPELLANT

¶12

AND

¶13

The lncome Tax Officer, Ward-10(3), Hyderabad

¶14

...RESPONDENT

¶15

Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. Sagarika Koneru, counsel representing Mr. Y. Ratnakar t

¶16

Counsel for the Respondent: Ms. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, Senior Standing Counsel lncome Tax Department

¶17

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶18

t \

¶19

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE P.SAiI,I KOSHY

¶20

AND

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CII.!.LAPATHI RAO

¶22

INCOME TAX TRIB UN AL APPBAL No.4.]0 of 2010

¶23

JUDCMENTT r1,,r tt,rt t,teSri Jyrricr.ts,rar A,,r/r.r

¶24

Ms. Sagarika Koneru, learned counsel, represent in . NIr. y. Ratnakar, learned counsel lor the appellant.

¶25

Ms' Bokaro S,pna Rcddy, Iearrccl Senior Standiur. |ourscl lor Income I { I'ax l)epartrrent appcarine on bchallol'rhc rcspondent.

¶26

Ms. Sagarika Koneru, learned counsel, repres€ntir* Mr.. y. Ratnakar, leamed counsel for the appellant, submits that despite all r:lrb,1s there has been no response flom the appellant's side. She, therefore, l)r'a r's that the present appeal may be disnrissed, with liberty gr.nted to the appcllrrnt to approach the Court in case the cause of action still survivcs.

¶27

Recording thc atbresaid subrnissi.. made by lrr. learned counsel appearing on behall'of the appellant, thc instant appea) .trrnds dismissed for want of prosecution resen,ing the right ol'the appellant 1o .evive the same in

¶28

Page I o f'l

¶29

case il the appcllant is still aggrievcd o1- the irnpugned order^passed by^the

¶30

lncome 1ax Appellate Tribunal. No costs

¶31

As a seque[, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶32

SD/- N. SRIHARI PUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

ECTION OFFICER

To,

The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, B-Bench, Hyderabad. 2. One CC to Mr Y. RatnakarAdvocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to t\Is. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, Senior Standing Counsel lncome Tax Department [OPUC]

¶37