Disposed¶28

Suguri Salaiah v. Mudavath Bichya

Telangana HC3 Jan 2025CRP/3963/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court; CRP No. 3963 of 2024; decided 03-01-2025 by Justice T. Vinod Kumar; Civil Revision Petition closed as infructuous on counsel's submission that the cause did not survive; challenge to non-passing of order in I.A. No. 224 of 2024 in O.S. No. 324 of 2022, Principal Junior Civil Judge, Devarakonda; related Section 151 CPC stay petition; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; parties: Suouri Salaiah (petitioner/defendant) v. Mudavath Bichya (died) and Mudavath Balu (respondents/plaintiffs) and Mohd. Niranjan (defendant No. 2); advocate Praveen Kumar Veerjala.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition closed as infructuous; no costs imposed; as a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, directed to stand closed. ¶28

Suguri Salaiah Vs Mudavath Bichya — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

i t I

I I I I i

I I i i

IN THE HIGH^{COURTFORTHESTATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD}

¶6

FRIDAY,^{THE THIRDDAYOF JANUARY} TWO^{THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE}

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE T.VINODKUMAR}

¶9

CIVIL REVISION^{PETITION NO:39630F 2024}

¶10

PetitionunderArticle22Toftheconstitutionoflndiaaggrievedbynotpassing Orderinl.A.No'224of2}24inOS'No'324o'f2)22onthefileoftheCourtofthe Principal Junior^{CivilJudge at Devarakonda'}

¶11

Between:

¶12

Suouri Salaiah,^{S/o. Narsaiah,Aged.} .61 ,^{years' Occ '} Agriculture,^Fi/o Etiliv"rr'Viirist^{oi'6n.nu"p"tMa;dal in NaisondaDistri} ct

¶13

...Petitioner^{No 1 / Petitioner/Defendant} AND

¶14

'1 . Mudavath Bichya, S/o. Rekya^{(died)Age- 51 years'Occ Aoriculture' Rl/o'} Buddoni^{Thanda Hlo crrit"ri/aiatviiil'dtfcl,i"Jr.petMaidalin Nalsonda} District

¶15

Mudavath^{Balu, S/o. Rekya,Age 41 years'Occ Agriculture'R/o' Buddoni} Thanda H/o^{chitriyata viiil?J 3t"chri,iim'peirr/lanfatinNaigonda District}

¶16

...Respondents^{1 &2 tRespondents / Ptaintiffs}

¶17

Mohd.^{Niranjan, S/o. Syed Ali, Age 42 Years'} ^Occ^{Private Employee' Rl/o'} " b;;;;ri;;Jitb*n ,n6 Mandal=rn Nalsonda District

¶18

...Respondent^{/ DefendantNo 2} (na ruot necessary Party )

¶19

IA NO: 10F²⁰²⁴

¶20

Petition under^{Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated} intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto stay all further^{proceedingsin O'S No' 324 ot 2022' on the file of the JuniorCivil} Judge, at^Devarakonda.

¶21

Counsel^{for the Petitioner:} Sri Praveen^{Kumar Veerjala}

¶22

Gounsel for^{the ResPondents:}

¶23

The Court made^{the following Order :}

¶24

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE T. VINOD KUMAR

¶25

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3 963 of 2024

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

Learnecl counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Civil Revision petition does not survive for consideration of the Court any further.

¶28

2 Recording same, this Civil Revision petition is closed as infructuous. No costs

¶29