Dismissed¶27

Radhe Shyam Mishra v. Mukund Das

Telangana HC16 Apr 2025CRP/1389/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, CRP No.1389 of 2018 (Radhe Shyam Mishra v. Mukunddas), decided 16.04.2025 by Smt. Justice K. Sujana. CRP under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against order dated 30.01.2018 in I.A.No.901 of 2017 in A.S.No.130 of 2016 of the XXVI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad; dismissed as infructuous on the submission of petitioner's counsel, with pending miscellaneous petitions closed. Related Section 151 CPC stay application in the CRP. No merits adjudication, no costs or quantum.

What did the court decide?

On the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the civil revision petition had become infructuous, the Court recorded the submission and dismissed the civil revision petition as infructuous, without adjudicating the challenge on merits. ¶27

Radhe Shyam Mishra Vs Mukund Das — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

t^338s1

¶2

I, t t I I i 1

¶3

rN rHE HrGH "orIf3$otJtot"tsE

¶4

oF TELANGANA

¶5

WEDNESDAY, .'._TT,TIO^{THE SIXTEENTHDAY OF APRIL} iHOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FIVE}

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE^{SMTJUSTICE K. SUJANA}

¶8

CIVIL^{REVISION PETITI ON NO:1 389oF 2018}

¶9

Petition Under^{A riicle 227 of the constitution of lndia seeking to set aside} so/or2o1B'^{Passed in lA No 901 of} Aqrrieved^{by the order} "no'i"'"r-""t'ilt"a ZOtZ tru AS.No.^{130ot ZOf-Oln tf'" nte ottne Court of the XXVI Additional Chief} Judge,^{CitYCivil Court, HYderabad'}

¶10

Between:

¶11

RADHE SHYAM^{MISHRA, S/o Shri'Ramlalit Mishra Aoe- 55 vears' Occ-} Business,^{R/o 4-4-368, r-",,i"ii'f,'ent c'iliiii 6itri s.,*'; u"zar' Hvderabad}

Revision

Petitioner/APPlicant

AND

MUKUNDDAS,s/olateGo-verdhanDas'Age-aboutTTyears'Occ-Business'iir""' ii. b:r:iil' i^{22. Banu street,Koth i, Hvderabad'}

¶16

...ResPondenUResPondent

¶17

IA NO:^{1 0F 2018}

¶18

Petition under^{Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the} affidavit^{fired in support .t t;p;tiil;, t"heHigh court may be preasedto stayall} further^{proceedings in nS.NO.iSdiiii'6'p".Ai"ng.ontne file of the XXVI Additional} Cni"iL,]agl,^{Citytirit court, Hvderabadtill the disposal of the cRP}

¶19

Counsel for^{the Petitioner: SRI' R UMENDER KUMAR}

¶20

Counsel for^{the Respondent : R A ACHUTHANAND}

¶21

The Court^{made the following: ORDER}

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶23

CML REVISION PETITTON No.t389 of 2Ot8

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Challenging the order dated 3O.O 1 .O l g passed in I.A.No.9O1 of 2OlT in A.S.No.13O of 2Ot6 by the learned XXVI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courr, Hyderabad, the present civil revision petition is hled.

¶26