Civil revision petition under Article 227 challenging an interlocutory order in an interlocutory application in O.S.No.1420 of 2014. Counsel stated the cause did not survive; the High Court dismissed the revision as infructuous, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I I I ,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
IVONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION N O: 1382 OF 2018
Petition under Article 227 ol the constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order dated 29.11.2017 passed in lA.No. 32g of 2014 in o S.No.1420 of 2014 on the file of V senior crvil Judge, city civil court at Hyderabad
Between:
lVR. L.YADAGIRI RAJU, S/o.Sri Ramulu, Age53 years, OccBusiness, Shop at 2-2-1132141N1, 2 86 3, Ground Floor, New Nallakunta, Shivam Road, Hyderabad - 500 044.
...PETITIONER
,'rND
...RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in os.No. 1420 of 2014 on the file V senior civil Judge, city civil court at Hyderabad, tilt the disposal of main revision petition .
THE HONOURABLESMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CIV[L REVISIONPETITION No'1382 of 2O18
ORAL ORDER:
Learned counselfor petitioner informed the Court that the cause in theCivil RevisionPetitiondoes not survive' and prayed this Court to dismissthis revision petitionas infructuous'
infructuous.There shailbe no order as to costs'
Miscellaneousapplications, if any pending'shall also stand
closed.
SiDI- MOHD.ISMAIL tiEPL,TYREGISTRAR
I
//TRUECOPY//
CTIONOFFTCER
To,
. TwoCD CoPies
N.^
'ilgh
HIGH COURT
DATED:2'll041202.1;
ORDER
1HE S IA r €'
(
6(
<br>i)]Jt) 17 JUN 2m ( tl
1?l_
?ts. 1r U\rr 'i<br>
CRP.No.1382 of 2018
DISMISSING THE C.R.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS.
b 1
il
\ t 1t''
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M.R. L.Yadagiri Raju
Mr. Renukunta Raghuramulu (died)
Mr. Renukunta Satyanarayana
Smt. Nalla Rajamani
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
