The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition and an Interlocutory Application for default, noting that a prior direction to issue fresh notice remained unattended despite the cost payment being complied with.
I.A. No. 2 of 2012 and CRP dismissed for default without costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t32171
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR TH STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOE AD
WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AN TWENTY FIVE
PRESE T
THE HONOURABLE SRI J STICE N.TUKARAMJI
l.A.No.2 of 2012 c.R.P.M. .NO.7650 0F 2012
ln/an
CIVIL REVISION PETITIO NO: 1030 OF 2025
Petition filed under Section 9'l of AP A) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act 1950 against the Order dated 0410512012P ssed in Case No.F2l3283/2011 on the file of the Joint Collecto(s) , Ranga ReddyDi trict
Between:
AND
(Respondents No.6 to 13 not necessary party in this petition)
...Respondents in GRp and l.A.No.2 ot 2012
l.A. NO: 2 OF 201zrcRPMP. NO:7650 oF 2012t
Petition under Section 5 of Limitation Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired. in supp,ort of the petiiion, the High court may oe pleased to condone the .r^eray of 1 2'r days in firing the above"cRe againsi the orders case No. F2r3283r2011 dt.o4rost2btz on tnl fire of rhe Lornt CEri""iorisl Ranga Reddy District
Counsel for the Petitioners : Smt. p Bharathi
Counsel for the Respondents: _ _ _
The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER
t I
ry
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUTICE N. TUKARAMJI
I t 2 L2 R.P. F2 L2 I N lo3o R.P. t >o2-{
COMMON ORDER
I.A.No.2 of 2Ol2 has beenfile by thepetitioners to condone the delay of (121) daYs in filingth CRP against the orderscase No.F2/32831201 1, dated 04.05.20L2 n the file of Joint Collector(s), Ranga Reddy District.
the direction.
I
2
(SR).No.30472 of 2012 are dismissed for default. No costs
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications,pending if any, shall
stand closed
Sb/- MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR \ \
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFIbER
To,
ADK/PSL n t\YT \
HIGH COURT
DATED:0510212025
COMMON ORDER
l.A.No.2 of 2012(C.R.P.M.P.NO.7650 OF 2012) ln/and GRP.No.1030 of 2025
..<br>C. ,^\
L
). 12NEM
-1.
...'
\j
I
o6snar Cui9
DISMISSING THE CRP AND l.A.No.2 of 2012 FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS ( It^
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition and Interlocutory Application should be dismissed for default due to non-compliance with a prior direction to issue fresh notice.
Smt. Jilla. @ Kavali Jagadamba and others
The Joint Collector(s), Ranga Reddy District
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
