Criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC against an order in a pending CBI case. Counsel submitted the matter had become infructuous; the High Court dismissed the revision as infructuous and closed pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I t I I I , I
[3385 ]
i II I I i i I I I l Ij
IN THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTYFOURTH DAYOF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL REVISION CAS E NO: 379 OF 2023
criminal Revisioncasefiled under Sectlon 397 and 401 of cr.P,cagainst the orderdated13.06.2023incrl.MP.No.5030f2023 inCC.No.170f 20090nthefileof the Courtof theI AdditionalSpecral Judge for CBI Casesat Hyderabad
Between:
Mr. V.N.Subhash ChandraBose, S/oSri V.V.tvlohanRao, Age! 53 y^ears' OCC. PrivatePerson,R/o. Flat No.G-1. G-2and G-3, Ground Floor, Poo1a n".iO"n"y bearing MunicipalNo.7-1-6211427,SR Nagar, Hyderabad'
...Petitioner/Accused No.7
AND
The State of Telangana,Through CBI/ACBHydglabadRepresentedby Spiciai ituOfic Proiecutor for C-Bt, High Courl of Telanganaat Hyderabad
...ResPondenUCom Plaina nt
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under section'l 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition, the High court may be pleasedto stay all furtherproceedingsin c.cNo.17 of 2009 on the file of the I Additional Sp6"i"f Judgefor CBI Caiesat Hyderabad including the personal appearance of thepetitionLr, pending drsposalof the main Criminal Revision Case in the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRIDEEPAK MISRA
Counsel for the Respondents:SPL PP FORCBI
The Court madethe following:ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SIJIANA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.379 of 2')23
ORDER:
Learned corrnst.i for thc pctilioner sullrrrt i rlLllat the
mir tter has ltecomc ilrll-ttctttttus
Recoi:ding thc srticl srtbmisston, this Cri;t irirlIlcvLsron
Case is disrntssed as itrfruc:tuous
Misccllancot.rs applications, if an5' pcnclirrl shiLll stand
c losed
SD/. V KAVITHA I EPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SXCTION OFFICER
To,
NVI}/,AI]K
w
HIGH COURT
DATED:2411012025
ORDER
CRLRC.No.379 ot 2023
1 EL{
,i\ '\ d.'
.$'
'(
r'-l-a) q ;il./1ic il
. <lj
? r-, . ru\ )'- .1
...--./
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS
q ."Sd
\1-.
\ d-r^
5
C,$'
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. V.N. Subhash Chandra Bose
The State of Telangana, Through CBI/ACB Hyderabad
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
