Allowed

Mohammad Sadiq v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC10 Nov 2025CRLP/8930/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and miscellaneous applications under BNSS to quash proceedings in a case registered for offences under Sections 447 and 427 IPC, relying on the voluntary compromise entered into between the accused and the legal heir of the deceased complainant.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of proceedings in Crime No. 1585 of 2021; Petitioner directed to pay costs of Rs. 5,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee.

Mohammad Sadiq Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^3s03 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶6

l.A.Nos.4 and 5 of 2025 ln/And

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8930 OF 2021

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mohammad Sadiq, S/o Late Md Khaja, Aged about 33^yrs, Occ: Real Estate Business, R/o. H.No.3-3-250 Aditya Nagar, New Hafeezpet Serilingampally (M), R.R. District Hyderabad - 500049 Telangana, INDIA

¶10

... Petitioner/Accused

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at High Court Through The Station House Officer, Miyapur Police Station, Cyberabad, Hyd.

¶13

... Respondents/Complainant

¶14

2 Mr. M. Subba Rao, S/o Not Known, Occ: Bussiness R/o H.No.3-3-504, Subhash Chandrabose Nagar New hafeezpet at Miyapur Hyderabad - 500049

¶15

3 A. Rajeswari, Wo Late A.Subba Rao, Aged 57^yrs, Occ: House Wife, R/o^H No. 3-3-504, Subhash Chandrabose Nagar, New Hafeezpet, Serilingapally (M), Ranga Reddy Dist Hyderabad- 500049

¶16

Legal representative brought on record as Respondent No.3 vtde Court Order daled 1011112025 i.e., l.A No 3 o12025 in Crlp No. 893012021.

¶17

... Respondents/Defacto Complainant

¶18

Petition under Sectton 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court^may be pleased to quash the FIR in Cr. No.1585 o'f 2021 registered by P.S.^Miyapur, pending before the Hon'ble VlllAdditional Metropolitan Magistrate at Kukatpally.

¶19

l.A. NO: 1OF 2021

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P,C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal^Petition, the^{HighCourt may} be pleased to stay all further^proceedings in Cr. No. I585 of 2021^registeredby PS Miyapur on the file of Hon'ble Vlll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate^at Kukatpally including the arrest of the accused till^finalisation of^{the above} Criminal petition in the interest of^justice

¶21

l.A. NO: 1 oF 2022

¶22

Between:

¶23

The State of Telangana, Rep. by the public prosecutor ligh Court at Hyderabad.

¶24

... Pe titioner/Respondent

¶25

AND

¶26

1 , Occ: Real

¶27

Serilingampaily (M), R.R. Districi H::1iu!i:,.r1!l dl: ,ul,,t 5i_!!si" Hvderib;'''s ^t',f: iljll,^'rq! l ,,,"',i Hafeezpet

¶28

2 Mr. M. Subba Rao, Occ: Bussiness R/o H.lJ r 3_3_504, Subhash 1" d b o o,;s"^".

¶29

c h a n d ra b o s e N a g a r, N ew n i re"lp ei iit,']vr p ri r_rvo, r, o "i (R2 is not a necessary party)

¶30

...Respc rdenUCom pla ina nt

¶31

Petition under Section .492 of Cr.p .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds or criminli ietition, 1-,,e High court may 3:jl"ffii;ii;;;i.,n. stay in crrp No es3oiitiron tn" r. "r-n"";oi"'riign

¶32

l.A.Nos.4 and5 ct 2025

¶33

t.A. NO: 4 0F 202s

¶34

Between:

¶35

Late A. Subba Rao. Wo A.Rajewari, Age Deceased. Occ ,lil, R/o H.No 3_3_ Ranga Reddy District, 504. Subhash Chandra HyderaUaE-ab ooseftigii, N;i^'-" H;6ffi;t^{' is'|vvrvvr} serii rgsrorl1r,r,,

¶36

A. Rajewari Wo Late A. jiS: : l"t'^{* *,"} Seritinsampaly H r.r o'r - s { oa, E, 1lr/y b d; nansi ; h iifiA.} R;ddy Aif"r riltri;i:iilA#;';d-4eii^jJJ,,,.r "T?

¶37

...petitioners/Respondents No.2 & 3/Del rcto Complainant

¶38

ANO

¶39

Mohammad Sadiq. S/o Lat( ,t:p"ui"?3",ffi ,'#]|[!$#]rff:i",:,"f,15J[l3,ii4??:,ffi 3:ffi5;t;

¶40

...RespondenUpetitiorrr rs/Accused No. 1

¶41

2 Iffi"?:ffi."^{*langana,Rep by the Public Prosecutor, Hi5rl court Buirding,}

¶42

...Respondents^/l lespondent No.1

¶43

petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High Court} may be^pleased to^{grant permission to compromise the matter betweenPetitioners} iAccused no.1 and^{Respondentsand move this Criminal petition} seeking to quash the crime no 1585 of²⁰²¹ of^P.S. Miyapur,^pending on the file of Vll Additional Judicial^{First Class Magistrate atKukatapally} against the Petitioners/Accused^{no 1'}

¶44

l.A. NO: 5 OF 2 025

¶45

petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying thal in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High Court} may be pleased to record^{the compromise and quashthe proceedingsin Cr.No.1585} ot iOZl of^{p.S. Miyapur, pendingon the file of Vll AdditionalJudicial First Class} Magistrate at kukatapally^{against the Petitioners/Accusedno.1.}

¶46

This^{petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandumof} Grounds of Criminal^{Petition and upon hearing thearguments} of Sri Jaya Surya^{VishnuVardhan,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public} prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶47

The Court made^{the following:COMMON ORDER}

¶48

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SR"EENI: VAS RAO

¶49

I.A.Nos.4 and 5 of 2025

¶50

IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.893O of 2Oi I

¶51

COMMON ORDER:

¶52

This Crirninal Petition has been hled by the ; t titione r / accused seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No. I >85 of 2O2l of Miyapur Police Station, Cyberabad, registered for tlt^. offences under Sections 447 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code, 18,r ) (for short,^,the IPCJ.

¶53

¶54

Mr. Jay:L Surya Vishnu Vardhan, learned ounsel for the petitioner, submitted that during the pendency of the rresent Crirninal Petition, respondent No.2 died and his legal heir. i.e., cspondent No.3 u,as brought on record. At the instance of the well ,r ishers, relatives and elders, the parties have settled the dispr l: and entered compromise and hled joint memo. Accordingly, resp I^.rdent No.3 liled I.A.Nos.4 and 5 of 2025 to permit them to compromis-- the case and to rccord the compromisc entered between them.

¶55

The petitioner and respondent No.3, A. Rajewar: .e., legal heir of respondent No.'21 de /oclo complainant, are present Ir, fore this Court and r,r,hcn this Court interacted with respondent No.3. she voluntarily stated that she has u,illfully and without any coerci, n entered into compromise and she is not having any objectior Lo quash the proceedings against the pc titioncr/ accused.

¶56

Both parties were identifled by their respective counsel.

¶57

In view of the compromise entered between the petitioncr and respondent No.3 as well as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.4 and 5 of 2O2S are allowed. Consequently, the proceedings in Crime No. 1585 of 2O2l of Miyapur police Station, Cyberabad, registcred for the offences under Sections 447 and,427 of thc IPC, are hereby quashed against the petitioner.

¶58

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/ - (Rupees five thousand only) by the peritioner to Lhe High Court i,egal Services Committee, wiLhin One (1) u,eek from today.

¶59

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/. A.V.S. PRASAD DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Vlll Additional^{Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally' Cyberabad} 2. The Station House^{Officer, Miyapur Police Station, Cyberabad}

¶64

Two CCs to Public^{Prosecutor,High Court for the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶65

. One CC to Sri Jaya Surya^{Vishnu Vardhan'Advocate} [OPUC]

¶66

One CC to Md.Abu Bakar^Siddiq

¶67

Two CD Copies

¶68

ABK/PSL

¶69

Along with a copy of Joint^{Memo of Compromise}

¶70

Note: Total Amount^{of Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) hasbeenpaid by} sri Jaya Surya^{Vishnu Vardhan, counselfor the Petitioner as directedby the} Hon'ble court^{vide order dated 10.11.2025to the "secretary,HighcourtLegal} services committee,^{Highcourt for the state of Telangana" and filed Memo as proof} of comp liance USR^{No. 141068 of2025 and Receipt No. 1776dated05-12-2025}

!!-Y

HIGH^COURT

DATED:^1011112025

COMMON^ORDER

l.A.Nos.4^{and 5 of 2025} ln/And

¶76

CRLP.No.8930^{ol 2021}

¶77

o ( t Lj
:,.
/.
s
o \1,<br>LL
+
1.
*
) )

¶78

ALLOWING^{THE l.A.Nos.4} and⁵ of 2025 AND

¶79

THE CRIMINAL^PETITION

a,
go

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT I{YDERABAD

I.A. No of2025

CRLP.NO 8930 of 2021

Between:

l.LateA. SubbaRao Wo A.Rajewari

¶89

Age.Deceaied ,Occ: Nil

¶90

R/o H.no: 3-3-504,Subhash Chandra bose Nagar,

¶91

New Hafeezpet, Serilingampally (M) R.R.Disrrict ,Hyd-49

¶92

A.RajewariWo^{Late A.SubbaRao}

¶93

Age.57^years, Occ: House wife

¶94

R/o H.no: 3-3-504,Subhash Chandra bose Nagar,

¶95

New l{afeeipet,^{Serilingampally(M)} R.R.District,Hyd-49

¶96

Petitioners/Respondents No.2 & 3/De-facto Complainant

¶97

And

¶98

l.MohammedSadiq^{S/o.LateMdKhala}

¶99

Age 36^{years, Occ: Re4l Estate Busines3}

¶100

No. 3-3-250,^AdityaNagar ,^{New Hafeezpet}

¶101

Serilingampal^{ly-(M)R.R.District,Hyd-49}

¶102

...Respondent/ Petitioners/Accused No. I

¶103

The^{State of Telangana}

¶104

Rep. by^{its Public Prosecutor}

¶105

High Court^{Building, Hyderabad}

¶106

.. . Respondents/ Respondent No.1

¶107

JOINTMEMO

¶108

l) It is submitted that the Petitioners herein filed the above Quash Petition seeking^{to quash the proceedings in CC. No. 1585} of 2021 of PS. Miyapur, pending^{on the file of the Hon'ble Addl. VII Judicial First} Class Magistrate, at Kukatpatly,^{for alleged offenceunder Section 447,427IPC. Wherein the} Petitioners^{are arraigned as Accused No.1.}

¶109

It is submitted that at the instarce of elders and^.,r ell-wishers, of the Petitioners and the De-facto complainant have intervened a rd both the parties have settled the disputes amicably rvithout any coercion or le rr and the De-facto complainant is uilling and agreed to withdraw the coml aint filed by him against the Petitioners i.e., Cr. No. 1585 of 2021of ps. Mi1,iL ,ur, pending on the file of the Hon'ble VII Addl. Judicial Fist Class Magistratt:. at Kukatpally, for alleged offence under Secrion 447,427 lpc.

¶110

Hence this joint memo

¶111

Place: Flyderabad, Date: 10.07.2025

¶112

A.fZafesWc-aA.Rajeshwari

¶113

Counsel for t e 2"'r Respondent

¶114

Counsel for the Petitioners

¶115

--l -'l /-,L) (Mohar#r E-dSadiq)

Mohammad Sadiq v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Sadiq v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Y.Gopal Reddy, Vs The State of Telengana

Konnay Naveen Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Mutyam Ravi Vs The State of Telangana

Dandi Karthik Vs The State of Telangana

Muddapu @ Makkala Lohith Vs The State of Telangana

Muddapu Geethika Vs The State of Telangana