Mr. Prasad Anand Telang Vs The State of Telangana

2 Smt. lVonrsha Prasad Telang, W/o Prasad Anand Telang, Aged about⁴² years, Occ Homemaker, R/o H No 5 52, Phase l, Sai Vihar Nagar Colony, Meerpet, Ranga Reddy Drstrict, Telangana^- 500097.

¶16

...Respondent

¶17

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the Htgh Court may be pleased to quash the the proceedings in FIR No 314 OF 2021^pendtng at WPS Saroornagar, R.R District against the^petrtro n e rs/Accused 1 to 2 for the offences U/s 4984,406 of IPC U/sec 4 of DP Act

¶18

LA. NO: 2OF 2025

¶19

BETWEEN:

¶20

Mr.Prasad Anand Telang, S/o. Anand Telang, Aged about 50^years, Occ. Private Employee. R/o S 2. Vikrant Society, Opp Gounkar Petrol Pump, Alto Betim, Bardez, Goa - 403521

¶21

Mr.Anand Laxmikanth Telang, S/o late Laxmikanth Telang, Aged about^B0 years, Occ. Retd R/o. S 2. Vikrant Society Opp Gounkar Petrol Pump, Alto Betim, Bardez, Goa - 403521

¶22

...Petitioner/Respondent/ )e-facto Complainant

¶23

AND

¶24

The Stateof feianqana, Rep by Public Prosecutor ll t h Court for the State of felangana at Hyderabad.

¶25

2 Smt. Monrsha Prasad Telang, Wo. Prasad Anand Ie.l;t rq. Aged abool 42 years. Occ llomenraker, R/o. H.No. 5 52. Phase I Sa ,/iha-Nagar Colony, lvleerpet, Ranrya Reddy Distnct, Telangana 50009l'

¶26

...Respondenls^{/Petitioners/Accused}

¶27

Petrtion under Section 359(6) of BNSS prayrng thal rn the ctrcurnstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitro- the l-ligh Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner permit the petitioner tc ;onrpromise the case in FIR No 314 OF 2022 on the file of WPS Saroornagar.

¶28

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶29

BETWEEN

¶30

1 Jr,4 r Pras_ad Anand Telang, S/o. Anand Telang, Aged tcout 50 years, Occ. Prrvate Employe_e. R/o. S-2, Vikrant Society, Opp. Gc,L r kar petrol-pump, Alto Betim, Bardez, Goa - 403521

¶31

2 Itilr Anand Laxmikanth Telang, S/o. late Laxmikanth 1.r lang, Aged about 80 years, Occ. Retd R/o. S-2, Vikrant Society, Opp. Gou - rar Petrol pump, Alto Betim, Bardez, Goa - 403521

¶32

. -.Petition:^'s/Accused No.1 & 2

¶33

AND

¶34

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, l-1rgl Courl for the State o[ Telangana al Hyderabad.

¶35

2 Smt. f\4onisha Prasad Telang, Wo. Prasad Anand Telan , Aged about 42 years, Occ. Homemaker, R/o H.No. 5-52, Phase l, Sai v haiNagar Colony, I\ileerpet, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana - 5000g7

¶36

...Respondents/t),-facto Complainant

¶37

Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that ir the circurnstances stated in the [\rlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition :he Fligh Court may be pleased to quash FIR No.314 of 2022 on the file of \ trS Saroornagar by compounding the offence in terms of compromise in the inte. st of justice.

¶38

ry

¶39

This Petition coming on for.hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G.Durga Charan, Advocate for the Petitioner and lvlr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶40

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

¶41

_.*w7

¶42

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA ]):VI EADA

¶43

I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025

¶44

in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.8543 of 2(t.'5

¶45

ORDER

¶46

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for tlr: petitioners/accused as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency cf the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and : :cordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise )etween them and to compound the offences.

¶47

Vide order dated 24.07.2025, this Cou( directed il e parties along with

¶48

their respective counsel to appear before the Secretar,, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telan; tna, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

¶49

Pursuant to the above said direction issued by th s Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Cou( Legal Ser,z :es Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 05.0r1 2025 and the same^'.r is placed on record

¶50

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits thrt charge sheet had already been filed in this case, and the same is numberer as C.C.No.5059 of 2022 on the file of the lll Additional Junior Civil Judr; r-cum-lll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at L.B.Nagar.

¶51

2

¶52

E D, J Crl P 8541 1025

¶53

ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition rs allowed and the proceedings tn C.C.No.5059 of 2022 arising out of FIR No.314 of 2022 on the file of the lll Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-lll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at L.B.Nagar, against the petitioners/accused are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners/accused paying an amount of Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings tuc.No.52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC Code:SB1N0020070, MICR No.500004057) and Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of three (03) weeks and fild proof of the same before the Registry

¶54

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

¶55

SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 The V Additional Metropolitan Magrstrate at L.B Nagar, Cyberabad.

¶60

2 The Station House Officer, Saroornagar WPS Police Station, Rachakonda 3 Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶61

4 One CC to Sri G Durga Charan Advocate [OpUC] 5 Two CD Copies Svs/l)q I tb,t,.

¶62

(Along * ith a coPt ol'.loirrt 1\lcrno)

¶63

Note : Total Amount of Rs 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand onl. ) has been paid by Sri G.Dr"rrga Charan, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by . : Hon ble Court vide order dated 14.082025 as Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand r rly) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad and; Rs.5,000i- (Rupees Five rr usand only) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad anc iled Memo as proof of complrance USR No..1 986 of 2026, dated 07-01-2026.

4

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 4108t2025

COMMON ORDER l.A Nos.2 and 3 ot 2025 ln/and GRLP.No.8543 of 2025

¶69

' 1" t,, . ;;,.','
,.,..,s 1,,
3 Zl JrN2ozt
,) I
*
a

¶70

ALLOWING THE l.A Nos.2 and 3 of 202!i ln/and CRLP.No.8543 of 2025

¶71

A

¶72

F)i /

¶73

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD rA NO. OF 2025

tn

CRL P.No.

OF 2025

BETlVEEN

Sri. Prasad Anand Telang, S/o Anand Telang,

¶79

Aged about 50 years, Occ: Pvt Emp

¶80

2 Sri. Anand Laxmikanth Telang, S/o late Laxmikanth Telang, Aged about B0 years, Occ: Retd.

¶81

1&2residentof:

¶82

R/0. S-2, Vikrant Society, Opp Gounkar Petrol Pump, Alto Betim, Bardez, Goa 403521

¶83

Pe t ition e r/Acc u s e d

¶84

AND

¶85

1 The State of Telangana Rep. By its Public Proseculor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad 2 Smt. Monisha Prasad Telang, W/o. Prasad Anand Telang, Aged about 42years, Occ: Homemaker, Rl/o. H.No. 5-52, Phase l, Sai Vihar Nagar Colony, Meerpet, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana - 500097

¶86

RespondenU Defacto Complainant

¶87

JOINT MEMO

¶88

May it please your lordship,

¶89

The Petitioners are arrayed as Accused No.1 and Accused No.2 in Crime No- 3L4 of 2O22 registered by W.P.S. Saroornagar Police

¶90

Station. which has culminated in filing of the final report

¶91

\ E@'\ ''i \ \

¶92

(charqesheet) in C.C. No. sosg of 2O22 (Filing rJ r. 11584/2022) on the file of the llon'ble Ill lunior Civil Judge Um-lII Additiona I l,letropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy Distric: , t L.B. Nagar, for offerrces alleqedly alslng ouI of matrimonial disc-; d.

¶93

2 The Petitioners and Respondent No.2 submii thai due to the interventi,lrr of eldcrs and lvell wiShers, the pa:lr :s have amicably settled all their disputes and decided to part vays peacefully. The rxarriaqe betr..reen Petitioner No.1 and Respor( ent lJo.2 has been dissolvecl by a decree of divorce dated 15-0: -2024 passed by the llon'ble Famrly Court, Ranga Reddy District.

¶94

3 Respondent i.Jo.2 states that she has no objecticr for quashing oF FIR No. 314i2O22. She affirms that she does not n ish to prosecute the matter any further and has voluntarily ;1 d unconditionally agreed for quashment of the criminal proceedings.

¶95

4 The parties respectfully subrnii that the conUnualt )n of the criminal case vvould serve no fruitfLll purpose and would or ly result in abuse of process of laur. The matter is purely personal it nature and has been amicably resolved.

¶96

5 The parties pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pl, rased to take this loint Memo on record and allow the Criminat pet I on by quashing the FIR No.3L4/2022 WpS Saroornagar Rang. Reddy District at

¶97

L. B. Nagar.

i I .J I j i

i ii

t

1 I I I I I I

ry

I I { I

It is^{therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleasedto record} the^{compromise statement and quashthe FIR No' 314 OF 2022'WPSSaroor} nagar^{by con-rpoundingthe offencein terms of compromisein the interest of} justice,^{in the interest of iusticeand passsuch other order or ordersmaydeent}

¶105

fit and^{proper in the circumstances of the case'}

¶106

Hence,^{thisJoint Memo'}

¶107

HYDERABAD DATE.dS^-O7-2025

¶108

Petitioner^No1

¶109

Petitioner^No2

¶110

6-^{o.-^o{'.'r-+,""'}