Disposed¶27

Mohd.Abdul Wahab and 2 Others v. the State of Telangana, Rep by P.P and Another

Telangana HC10 Feb 2025CRLP/8391/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, K. Lakshman J., 10-02-2025; Crl.P. No.8391 of 2017; S.482 CrPC quash of Crime No.142/2017 Ramagopalpet PS Secunderabad (Ss.420, 468, 471 IPC); investigation ended 'un-detected' on 30.11.2024 with final report filed; petition closed without merits adjudication; petitioners Mohd Abdul Wahab, Mohd Hamza Wahab, Zeenath Fathima; respondent No.2 Mohd Abdul Rahim; advocate A.K. Narasimha Rao; Public Prosecutor (TG).

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; the Criminal Petition was closed (neither quashed nor decided on merits) because the cause no longer survives following the 'un-detected' final report of 30.11.2024; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the criminal petition also stand closed. ¶27

Mohd.Abdul Wahab and 2 Others Vs the State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

t^3{68 I

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STAIEOFTELANGANA} MONDAY ,THE^{TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FIVE}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEK.LAKSHMAN} CRIMINAL PETI^{TION NO:83 91 0F 2017}

¶5

Between:

¶6

1 tvIOHD ABDUL^{WAHABAND 2 OTHERS,S/o M A Rahmen'aged 56.years'} O". Br.i"..., alo^{H.Noz-g-3b7, Nallagutta, Ramgopalpet' Secunderabad'}

¶7

2.tvlohd.HamzaWahab,,S/o.MohdAbdulWahab,.aged19years'R/o - U'f.lo.Z g-iSZ, Nallagutti, Ramgopalpet, Secunderabad'

¶8

Zeenath Fathima',^{Wo. Mohd- AbdulWahab, aged 46 years, R/o. H.No.2-3-} - 5gz, Nallagutta, Rbmgopalpet, Secunderabad

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)

¶10

AND

¶11

1 THESTATEoFTELANGANA,REPBYP.PANDANoTHER,TepTesentedby iir'Froii"^{p.i"cutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad'}

¶12

2 Mohd. Abdul^{Rahim,, S/o. Late tv1.A.Karim, aged 45 years' Occ Business' R/o'} i-l -l^g e, Nallagutta,^{Ranigu nj, Secunderabad'}

¶13

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS

¶14

Petition under^{Section482 of Cr'P 'C prayingthat in the circumstances} statedinthelVlemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmaybe pi"r."o to quash the cr.No..!4212017^{dated 25-5-2017 on the file of the Station} ilouse Officer, Ramagopalpet,^{P.S-, Secunderabad'}

¶15

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017^{(CRLPMP. NO: 8976oF 20171}

¶16

Petition under Section^{482 of Cr'P C prayingthat in the clrcumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof Criminal Petition'the High Court T?y b"} to stay of all^{further proceedings in Cr'.No142t2017 dated 25-5-2017 on} ;i;;; the file of the^{Station House officer,RalmagopalpetPolice station,Secunderabad} including appearance^{of the petitioner'} This Petition coming^{on for hearing, upon perusingthe Memorandumof} Grounds of criminal^{Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri} A.K'NARASINIHARAo,AdvocateforthePetitionerandthePublicProsecutor (TG) on behalf of the^{RespondentNo'1 andnone appearedfor the Respondent} No.2

¶17

The Court made^{the following: ORDER}

¶18

t t

¶19

:- '?:a-.r.-",7

¶20

HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITI ON No.8391 OF 2Ol7

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

\ \

¶24

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section - 482 of (.lr.p.C. to quash the p;roceedings in Crime No.l42 of 2017 pending on lhe file of Ramagopalpet Police Station.

¶25

The petitioners herein are accused Nos.t,3 and 4 in the aforesaid^(lrime. The offences alleged against them ar:e under Sections - 420. 468, 47 I readwith 15 I of IpC.

¶26

Lcamed Public Prosecutor has produced rvritten instruction of the Sub-Inspector of Police, Ramgopalpet potice Station, wherein it is stated thart the lnvestigating Officer, on completion of investigation, has -referred thc matter as^{,un-detectedl} on 30.11.2024 itsc.lf. Final report has been filed in the concemed Court. Ihe saicl written instructions are placed on record. In the tight of the samc. nothing remains in the present petition to adjudicate further and cause no longer survi.zes.

¶27