Accused in a pending trial under Sections 294(b), 353 and 506 IPC sought exemption from personal appearance on each adjournment citing hardship to his employment. The High Court dispensed with his presence subject to representation through counsel and appearance when directed by the trial court, and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( l i i
|3217 |
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8025 0F 2025
Between:
Dharavath Qha.n-Q.u Nay_ak, S/o, Late Raju, Age. 48 years, Occ. Ex. Sarpanch, R/o. Sarapaka Village, Burgampahad Manda[ Bhadiadri Kothagudem tjistrict.'
...Petitioner
AND
... Res ponde nUCom pla ina nt
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in c.c. No. 24 of 2019 on the file of Judlciat First Class Magistrate at Bhadrachalam for the alleged offence U/Sec. 294(b), 353 and 506 of IPC
l.A. NO: 'l OF 2025
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminalpetition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in c.c. No. 24 of 2019 on the file of Judlcial First class Magistrate at Bhadrachalam against the petitioner/Accused including his appearance, pending disposal of the above criminal petition
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri ANNApURNA SREERAM, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No,1 and None appeared for the Respondent No. 2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI
c RIMINAL PETITION No.8025 ot 2025
ORDER:
This petition is filed seeking quashment of the C.C.No.24 of 2019 on the file of learned Judicial First ClassIVagistrate at Bhadrachalam, against thepetitioner/accused.
2
l---l
SD/-M.NAGAMANI STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
SM/psl
\
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0110712025
==-:--
o (
(-)
SOJUL 2M 7
I
t
SPATci reo
ORDER
CRLP.No.8025 of 2025
DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION
a
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the personal presence of the petitioner/accused before the trial court on every adjournment in C.C.No.24 of 2019 could be dispensed with.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dharavath Chan Chu Nayak
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad
Kodi Yakubu
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
