Petitioners sought quashing of FIR under Sections 108/3(5) BNS and a stay of proceedings. Counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition on the ground that petitioners and second respondent are family members; the State raised no objection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t!2ill
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CR]MINAL PETITIO NO:2731 OF2025
Between:
..,PETITIONERS'ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO 3
AND
...RESPONDENTS'COMPLAINANT
Petition under Sec.tion 528 OF BNSSpraying thatin the circumstan@s stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to call for the records in connection with Cr. No. 583 ot 2024 On The File of the SHO ll Town Police Station, Khammam, registered undersection108 R/w. 3(5) of BNS, andquash the same by allowing the abovepetition.
Petition under Section 528 OF BNSSpraying thatin thecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court maybe pleased to Stay all further proceedings, including arrest of the Petitioners/Accused No.'l to 3 in Cr. No. 583 ol 2O24 On The File of the SHO ll Town Police Station, Khammam, re$istered under section 108 R/w. 3(5) of BNS,pending disposalof the above criminal petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon.perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri MUMMANENI SRINIVASA RAO, Advocate for the Petitioners and SRI E GANESH, theAssistant Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JuSTICEE.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMIN,AL No.2731 O 2025
ORDER:
Learned counsel forthepetitioners,upon
instructions, seekspermissionof this Court to withdraw the Criminal Petitionon the groundthat the petitioners and the 2nd respondentare family members
the lst respondent/Stateraises no objection'
pending shall stand dismissed.
SD'. L.VIJAYALAXMI ASTSSTANTREGISTRAR
,/TRUE COPY"
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
i !
HIGH COURT
DATED iC1,rc9t2121
ORDER
CRLP.No.2731 of zAZs
( T H E s T4
oo ^ {(1 (-
D
?? il0t/ &t
*
<!
PaTcuEo *
DISMISSING THE CRLP AS WTHDRAWN
-rd*
&rv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition seeking quashing of FIR Cr. No. 583 of 2024 should be permitted to be withdrawn.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Chekuri Shekar
Chekuri Sujatha
Talluri Gangadhar
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor
Chekuri Nagendramma
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
