Petitioners sought quashing of proceedings in SC No.8 of 2021 under Section 482 CrPC. Counsel submitted the parties had settled the matter and connected proceedings were already quashed. The Court held the cause did not survive for adjudication and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA // AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
CRIMINAL PETITI ONN O:2422OF 2021
Between:
R/o. Anupama Nagar Colony, Near Sakshi School, Hasthinapuram, Hyderabad.
...Petitioner/Accused-Nos. 1,2,3,4,5,6&7
AND
...Respondents
Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that i r the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petitior, the High court may be pleased to Quash the proceeding in SC.No.8 ot 2o21 n the iite of the Vll Addl. District and Sessions Judge, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that ir the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in SC No. 8 of 2) 1, on lhe file of the vll Addl District Judge, R.R.Dist. at L.B.Nagar pending c i posal of the above criminal petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing rre Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the argum,; rts of [VIr cHEKURI YADAGIRI, Advocate for thepetitioners and Mr M.V|vEKFl ANDA REDDy, the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Responcr nt No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
TIIE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.2422 of}O2l
ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for consideration, Mr.K.Karuna Sagar, leamed counsel for the petitioners fairly submitted that the cause in this criminal petition does not survive for adjudication, on the ground that the parties have settled the matter by way of a compromise, and this Court has already quashed the proceedings in another connected criminal petition.
2 In view of the above submission, the cause in the criminal
petition does not survive for adjudication.
infructuous.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed.
SD/. P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA PUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
S TION OFFICER
To,
RC/SAW
I I i 'li
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0411112025
ORDER
CRLP.No.2422 of 2021
Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is E) smissed as lnfructuous.
8.dd Y<-.-<") ,.1",t-',
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings in SC No.8 of 2021 should be quashed after the parties settled the matter by compromise.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Thota Venkataramana
Thota Satyanarayana
Thota Anjali
Smt. Pratap Haritha
Smt. Sakkuri Vanitha
Anupama Pratap Dinesh
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
