Allowed

Kamuni Santosh Kumar v. Smt.Radhika Killary

Telangana HC3 Mar 2025CRLP/2405/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Accused sought quashing of proceedings under Sections 376(2)(n), 417, 420 r/w 34 IPC and the SC/ST (POA) Act based on compromise with the complainant. After verification by the High Court Legal Services Committee, the Court recorded the compromise, allowed compounding applications, and quashed the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings against petitioners/A1 and A2 in SC.SPL No.8 of 2022 quashed; l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 allowed recording compromise and compounding.

Kamuni Santosh Kumar Vs Smt.Radhika Killary — Caste Atrocities | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

¶6

l.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of 2025 IN/AND

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2405 OF 2025

¶8

Between:

¶9

1- Kamuni Santosh Kumar, S/o- Prabhakar, aged about 38 years, Occu. Unemployed, R/o.Flat No.'10.1, 1st floor, Hill Town Crest Apartments, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶10

Kamuni Anuradha, Wo,Prabhakar, aged about 60^years, Occu. Housewife, R/o.Flat No.101, 1st floor, Hill Town Crest Apartments, ltlusheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶11

...Petitioner/A1 & A2

¶12

AND

¶13

Smt.Radhika Killary, Wio,Kamuni Santosh Kumar, Dio.K.P.Kasi Ram, aged about 36 years, Occu. Pvt Employee, R/o.Flat No.101,1st floor, Hill Town Crest Apartments, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶14

The state of Telangana, The Station House Officer, Musheerabad Police Station, Hyderabad commissionerate, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the state of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶15

...Respondent No. 1&2

¶16

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners lA1 & 2 in SC.SPL No.8 of 2022 on the file of Vl Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad (lvlusheerabad Police Station, Hyderabad) for.the alleged offences U/s,376(2)(n), 417,420 IPC,R/w, 34 IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(Va) of SC & ST Act.

¶17

l.A. NO: 2OF 2025

¶18

Between:

¶19

Smt.Radhika Killary, Wo,Kamuni Santosh Kumar, D/o.K.P.Kasi Ram, aged about 36 years, Occu. Pvt Employee, Rio.Flat No.101,1st floor, Hill Town Crest Apartments,lVlusheerabad,Hyderabad. ...Petitioner/RespondentNo.l

.,.-,.j

',.i:

AND

Kamuni Santosh Kumar, S/o. Prabhakar, aged about 38 years, Occu. Unemployed, R/o.Flat No.10'1 , 1st floor, Hill Town Crest Apartments. Mus heerabad, Hyderabad.

¶24

Kamuni Anuradha, Wo,Prabhakar, aged about 60 years. Oc ou. Housewife, R/o.FIat No.1(' , 1st floor, Hill Town Crest Apa.tments, [,r'lusheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶25

The Station llouse Officer, Musheerabad Police Station,Hyderabad commissionerate, Rep by its Public Prosecutor:, High Cou 1 lor the state of Telangana.Hyderabad.

¶26

...ResponrJent No. 1 to 3

¶27

Petition under Section 359(6) RAI/ 528 BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds ol Criminzrl Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant permission to the petitioner/Rl to Compound the offences in SC.St'- No.8 of 2022 on the file of VI Addl fi/etropclitan Sessions Judge, Sec'bad (Musheerabad Police Station, Hyderabad) rand acqtrit Respondent No.1 & 2.

¶28

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶29

Petition under Section 359(2) R/W 528 of BNS{j prat/ing that in the circumstances stated n the Memorandum of Grounds of Crirn na I petition, the High Court may be pk:ased to record compromise in SC.SF,L No 8 of 2022 on the file of Vl Additional lvlt-.tropolita n Sessions Judge, Sec'bad (tVlusheerabad police Station, Hyderabad) and acquit Respondent No 1 & 2.

¶30

This Petition crtming on for hearing, upon perusingy the lvle,morandum of Grounds of Crim,nal lretition and upon hearing the argurrents of rjri G. Suresh Goud, Advocate for tl- e Petitioner and the Additional publir; prosec rtor on behalf of the Respondent Nlo. 2 and ol Sri Allu Nageswara Fao, Advccate for the Respondent No 1 .

¶31

The Court made the fr:llowing: ORDER

¶32

I,,

¶33

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

¶34

l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.2405 of 2025

¶35

COMMON ORDER:

¶36

This Criminal Petition is flled under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 to^quash the^proceedings against them in SC SPL No.B of 2022 on the file of Vl Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n),⁴²⁰ and^{417 rlw} 34 of IPC and Section 3(1X0(s) and 3(2)^(Va) of SCs & STs (POA)Act.

¶37

lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.1, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the^parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025^{have been} filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

¶38

Vide order dated 19.02.2025, this Court directed the^parties along with their respective counsel to appear before^the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court^for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and^to submit a report.

¶39

¶40

Pursuart to the above said direction^{issuerd by th s Court,} the parties hirve appeared and the^{Secretary, FlighCottrtLegal} Services Corrmittee, has identified the^{partiesrand submitteda} report, dated 24.02.2025 and the same^{is placed on recotd}

¶41

ln view rf the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3^{of 2')25 are allowed.} Consequentll', this Criminal Petition is^{all:wed itnd the} proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos l and 2^{in SC} SPL No 8 of 2022 on the file of Vl Additioral^{tulet'opolitan}

¶42

Sessions. Judge, Secunderabad, are^{hereby quas,hed.}

¶43

[\4iscellaneous applications, if any^{pending,:;hitll stand}

¶44

closed.

¶45

IiESlL?t"^H ^38[i,i.f

¶46

,[' I,TRUE^COPY" ',.^{\ SECTION OFFICER}

¶47

¶48

To,

¶49

3'Jli'1

¶50

1. 2 H:Xiil.i'fl^{l;:y3["'J"?"'fi l':"#ffi "lF:?;"'f"::T3?:ll';3;5lf} lyd-":*3?^ t) rblic^{Prosecutor' High court for the state of l-elanganaat}

¶51

1. i;!t*l^{jli'ii; ;.:;'-"tar seNicescommitte e' Hig h ( ;ourt Bu.dings'} 6 ?,?J',ffi"$:?;^{HlSliiJ3J'ii!} "''

¶52

6 d* #^* 7 Two^{GD CoPies}

¶53

DL/PSL ", Y+

¶54

HIGH COURT

¶55

DATED:03/03120125

¶56

'dl
=' T
v" \ )
?
,:)
i-..-t"

¶57

COMMON ORDER.

¶58

l.A. Nos. 2 and 3 af 2025 ln/and

¶59

CRLP.No.24O5 ol'2025

¶60

l.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed &

¶61

Criminal Petition is allowed

¶62

¶63

.r1
U

Kamuni Santosh Kumar v. Smt.Radhika Killary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamuni Santosh Kumar v. Smt.Radhika Killary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pothula Ravinder Vs The State of Telangana

Muthyala Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Pudur Arun Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Raj Purohith Mahender Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Mukku Kanaka Durga Prasad, Vs The State of Telangana

Sai Vs The State of Telangana