Quashing petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against proceedings in C.C.No.322 of 2013 dismissed for non-prosecution; no representation appeared for the petitioners on multiple dates and the court declined to keep the petition pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3251 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITI ON NO:2266OF 2019
Between:
...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1 & 2.
AND
...RE''.NDENT/..M'LATNANTS
Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the court below to furnish the complete Judgirent copy by passing the sentence in cc No. 322 ol 2013 on the file of the Hon'5le special'XlV Metropolitan Magistrate, Erramanjil, Hyderabad by setting aside the return endorsement dated'16.10.2018 of the Hon'ble spl. ilv Metropolitan Magistrate, Erramanjil, Hyderabad.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri sURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA, (No Representation) Advocate for the petitioners and the Additional Public Prosecutor for the state of relangana on behalf of the Respondent No.1. and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Gourt made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2266 OF 2019
ORDER:
This Crirninal Petition is {iled by the petitioners to quash proceeclings in C.C.No.322 of 2013, on the file of Special XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Erramanjil, Hyderabad
Asstssrl"l+o#?'Lt+[tk /ITRUECOPY"
\
ECTIONOFFICER
To
HIGH COURl'
DATED: 1010212025
ORDER
CRLP.No.2266 of 2019
I4.{E S?h 14.
/c ((f'
io:'. 'l E t4AB 2J25
(:
),,
:.:..t r.
.'.'
DISMISSING THE CRL.PETITION r# -__l-</sup> l3l: {rs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quashing petition should be kept pending when petitioners repeatedly failed to appear.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. D.R. Logistic (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Director, Sri Devadoss Reddy
Sri Raghava Reddy
The State of Telangana
M/s. Pridhvi Asset Reconstruction and Securitization Company
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
