Disposed

Vanga Jawahar Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC10 Feb 2025CRLP/1783/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Accused sought quashing of proceedings in C.C.No.606 of 2024 for offences under Sections 447, 427 and 379 IPC. Counsel restricted the prayer to dispensing with personal appearance. The High Court disposed of the petition dispensing with appearance, subject to representation by counsel at every hearing.

What did the court decide?

Personal appearance of petitioner/accused before the trial Court dispensed with unless specifically required, subject to counsel representing him on every hearing date; miscellaneous applications clos

Vanga Jawahar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

13257 1

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1783 OF 2025

¶6

Between:

¶7

Vanga Jawahar Reddy, S/o. Shivarami Reddy, aged about 53 years, Occ. Advocate and Agriculture, R/o. H.No.1-2^-270187129, Krishna Nagar Colony, Suryapet Town and District.

¶8

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

al':}

¶11

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court or the State of Telangana, Hyderabad,

¶12

Saliganti Annapurna, Wo. Raja Rao, aged 47 yearc, Occ. Housewife,^R/o. Salarjungpeta' Kodad rown

¶13

...RES'.NDENT/..M'LATNANTS

¶14

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High^{Court may} be pleased to call for the records relating to C.C.No.60612024 on the file^of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kodad and^quash the same;

¶15

l.A. NO: 1OF 2025

¶16

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS,^praying that in the circumstances stated in the liilemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High^{Court may} be pleased to stay of all further^proceedings including appearance of^the petitioner/Accused in C.C. No.606/2024 on the file of Judicial lrlagistrate of First Class, Kodad;

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon^perusing the Memorandum^of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of^{Sri KOYA} PRABHAKAR REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender^Rao Veeramalla, Addl. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent^{No.'1 and none} appear for the Respondent No.2;

¶18

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶19

,r'.:11' ,€'"^/

¶20

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No.1783 of 2025

¶22

ORDER

¶23

This Oriminal Petition is filed by the^petitioner I

¶24

/accused seeking to^quash the^proceedings against^{him in} C.C.No.606 of 2024 pending rn the file of learned Judicial fi/lagistrate of^{First Class,} Kodad for the offences under sections 447,427,379 of lndian Penal Code

¶25

2 Heard l\lr.K.Prabhakar Reddy, learned counsel fcr^petitioner, Sri Jithender Rero Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1-State and perused the recorcl

¶26

3 Thor.rgh the petition is filed for quashing the proceedings, during the coursr: of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has restricted his pra'7er to lhe extent of dispensing with the prer;ence of the petitioner/accused before the trial Court

¶27

4 Hence, this petition is disposed of dispensing with the appearance of ttre petitioner/accused before the trial Court unless his presence is specifically required during the course of trial, subject to the condition of petitioner/accused being represented by his counsel on every date of hee ring

¶28

'!t

¶29

¶30

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed

¶31

Sd/- V. KAVITHA ASSISTAN T REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPYII

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Prl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kodad

¶37

The Station House Officel Kodid Town p.S_ Suryapet Oistrict 3. One CC to SRI KOYA PRAB_HAKAR REDDi;dvocate tOpUCl 4 Two CCs to^pUBLtc PROSECUTOR, HGh-C;; at UyOeiraOaJiOUry

¶38

Two CD Copies

VSM/gh &f -A

. a-... : 1

: I I i I I I l

HIGH COURT

DATED:1010212025

{:.^'j'

ORDER

CRLP.No.1783 of 2025

rllf_ 5 to'al\<br>e oB
'-. \r
oc 4\i
03 apn 2l?5 , ,)
o
,+ ,:/
*
Or-
l a :/

¶50

DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION

¶51

>
: '..} r

Vanga Jawahar Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vanga Jawahar Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rapole Jayaprakash, Vs The State of Telangana

Vanabhoju Venkata Chary Vs The State of Telangana

Gavvala Hari Prasad Vs State of Telangana

Shyamala Naveen Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

T. Vinod Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Parvathapally Kiran kumar Vs The State of Telangana.