Dismissed

Muthyala Mahesh Goud v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC18 Dec 2025CRLP/17023/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a criminal petition under Sections 528 and 529 of the BNSS to quash an order and direct two schools to produce employment particulars of a respondent. The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the employers directly for the required information, leading to dismissal.

What did the court decide?

Criminal petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to approach employers for employment particulars.

Muthyala Mahesh Goud Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA // AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶5

CRIMINA LPE TITION NO: 17023 O F 2025

¶6

Between:

¶7

MUTHYALA MAHESH GOUD, S/o. Sri M. Srinivas Goud, Aged about 38 Years, occ. contract service, Ri/o prot rrro.ss, noao No.+,-iriir,,lnl"irlgur, Sangareddy, Telangana State

¶8

...petitioner AND

¶9

The State of Telangana,, Represented by its public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶10

Mis SHANKARAMPETA SWETHA & SARITHA, *,o. MT. il,.,ffi,fl:fl:Il Goud, Aged about 32 years, occ. privaie service. ny".'i.l.i".i_i,s,,,;r"t No.09, lrzlalkapur Village, Kondapur lVtanOai Sa ngareOOy.

¶11

...Respondent

¶12

Petition under Section .528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvremorandum of Grounds or criI.,in'ai'petition, the High court may be preased to QUASH the orders aarca oioztziiis in crt M.p No 2200 0f 2024 passed in 2024 in D V c No 18 of 2021 0n ttr" it" of the r aaoL .lr-ni"or?iuir Judge cum Judiciar Magistrate of Firsr ciass sa"ngareooy and pass appropriate orders to the court berow to.direct the (1) eii*ipi)oir".tor of st ANTHoNEys HIGH SCHOOL SANTHI NAGAR SNTbANEOOVANd (2) THE DIRECTOR Or Authorized Authoritv of RAos rNNov-rous TNTENATT.NAL scHooL MALKAPUR SANGAREDDy to proauce or-f-ril" the emproyment /service particulars _of Respondent No 2/Respondenvwire ie., Mrs sHANKARAM'ETA SWETHA @ SARTTHA W/o tVr Muthyata frrr"n".i, 6"ro in D V C No 18 of 202.1

¶13

-1.A. NO: 1 oF 2025

¶14

Petition under Section.52g of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds or cri[rin'ai'petition, the High court may b9..ote31ed jo Stav of ail further proceeoins;'i;"6i).c. r.ro.ra of 2021 ,on the fire of the r Addr' Junior Judge - cum - .r uo iciar"nrrag istraie of First crass, sangareddy

¶15

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing lre Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing he arguments of Mr M V S SAI SHARATH, Advocate for the Petitioner and lv r. JITHENDER RAO VEERAMALLA, the Additional Public Prosecutor on behall rf Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2

¶16

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶17

¶18

I I

¶19

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No.17023 of 2025

Date: 18.12.2025

Between:

Muthyala Mahesh Goud

...Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad and another

¶28

...Respondents

¶29

Ozu)ER

¶30

Sri M. V. S. Sai Sharath, leamed counsel for the petitioner,

¶31

seeks permission of this Couft to withdraw the criminal petition, with liberty to approach the employer of respondent No. 2, namely

¶32

St. Anthony's High School, Santhi Nagar, Sangareddy, and RAOS Innovious Intemational School, Malkapur, Sangareddy, by filing an app lication^{/representation} seeking necessary information and required documents of respondent No. 2.

¶33

In view of the above submissions, the criminal petition is

¶34

dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty as sought for

¶35

¶36

Pending miscellaneous applications, il ar y, shall stand

¶37

closed

¶38

//TRUE COPYII

¶39

i:i,Et'i,#H.[t?HIA \L-

\ \

,^sEcroru oFFrcER

To,

1 The I Addt. Junior civil sangareddy. Judge Cum Judicial Ma g strate of First Class

¶44

2I I he S_tation House Officer,^ _ police I tation, Sangareddv. I'iJ3r:SrTiJr"riubric Prosecutor, High courtfIrin",, ,,rt" or rerangana,'at

¶45

4 Yi'i%Bttl[;#^{v s sAr SHARATH,Advocate} IoPU( I

RC/Sa

Txs

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1811212025

ORDER

CRLP.No.17023 of²⁰²⁵

--.2_:==
4
irrrr st Iq
l
) 7'z
I I JAN 2026
c)
/r,
t
*ol_q:3.I;

¶53

Accordingly, this Griminal^{Petition is Dismissedas} Withdrawn. ';f^{rf t;}

Muthyala Mahesh Goud v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthyala Mahesh Goud v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaik Nayeem, Vs The State of Telangana

Marepally Sai Ram Vs The State of Telangana

Mr. Patibandla Rambabu, Vs State of Telangana

Mr.Nomula Ailaiah @Ilaiah Vs The state of Telangana

Bhanuru Nagender Vs State of Telangana

Mr. Mohd Abdul Mukkaram, Vs The State of Telangana