Disposed

Uppu Mohan Krishna v. Uppu Lavanya

Telangana HC6 Feb 2025CRLP/1682/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of proceedings in a domestic violence case pending before the Ranga Reddy trial court. Counsel restricted the prayer to dispensing with their presence; the High Court disposed of the petition by exempting them from appearing unless specifically required during trial, subject to representation by counsel on every hearing date.

What did the court decide?

Personal appearance of petitioners in DVC No.44 of 2024 dispensed with unless specifically required at trial, subject to representation by counsel on every hearing date; order vacates automatically on

Uppu Mohan Krishna Vs Uppu Lavanya — Domestic Violence | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

13257 l

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶3

THURSDAY ,THE^{SIXTHDAYOF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYFIVE} PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT^{JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI} CRIMINAL PETI^{TIONNO:1682OF 2025}

¶5

Between:

¶6

-- t. Uppu Mohan Krishna, S/o. Uppu Subba Rao, -Aged about 32 Y-ears' Occ Assrstant Manager,^{R/o Police Quarters 3' Singarayakonda'Prakasham} District, Andhra^{Fradesh 523101 . Also at.- Presentlyworking in Canara B-ank,} Dornala Branch,^{Andhra Pradesh 523331 and residing at canaraBank} QuartersatDomalaVillageandMandal,PrakashamDistrict,AndhraPradesh. 523331

¶7

Smt. Vemula^{Bhargavi,Wo. Uppu Mohan Krishna'Aged about-27 Years'} Occ. Software^{Employee, R/o. H No l-1 1, NuthalpaduVillage' Prakasham} District, Paruchur^{Mandal, Andhra Pradesh 523 169}

¶8

: Uppu Subba^{Rao, S/o. Uppu Komaraiah,Aged about58 Years' Occ Head} Constable, Subba^Rao,

¶9

Uppu Baby, Wo^{Uppu Aged about50 Years, Occ Housewife'}

¶10

a;;, Sainath,^{Slo.Uppu Subba Rao, Aged about 25 Years' Occ. Student.} R/o.PoliceQuarters3,.Singarayakonda,PrakashamDistrict,AndhraPradesh 523 l01

¶11

...PETtrtoNERS/AccusED^{No'1 To5}

¶12

AND

¶13

Uppu Lavanya, ,^{Wo.Uppu Mohan Krishna,Aged about34 Years' Occ'} Housewife.R/o'H.No.2g-3l3t},SriNilayaTownship,WCBadangapet,VT, Po Badangapet,^{RangaReddy District'}

¶14

2 Uppu Reeiutf,a,^{Olo. Uppu Mohan KrishnaAged about 17 Years' Occ} Student

¶15

S - Uppu Myytrosh, siuoent. bompiainant^{S/o. Uppu Mohan No. 2 and 3 Krishna being minors Aged Rep. by about 1'1 their natural guardianYears' Occ'} mother. All are R/o.^{H' No.29.313/B' Sri Nilaya Township, WC Badangapet,} VT, Po Badangapet,^{Ranga Reddy} -^District'

¶16

i?espondent No.1 to^{3/DefactoComplainant}

¶17

The State of Telangana,^{Repby its Public Prosecutor,High Court Bldgs'} Hvderabad

¶18

...RESpoNDENT/PRosEcurloN

¶19

PetitionunderSection52SofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the^{Memorandum of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High Courtmay} f" pferseO to call^{for the records relating to proceedingsin DVC No 44 of 2024} on ih" fil" of the^{Vl AJCJCUMVl Addl. Judicial of First Class Magistrate-Ranga} Reddy dist. and^{quash the sameas illegal,}

¶20

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025

¶21

Petition under Section 528 of^{BNS$i- praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of criminal Petition,the High courtmay} be pleased to stay of^{all further proceedingsin DVC No. 44 of 2024 on the file of} the Vl AJCJ CUM Vl^{Addl Judicialof First class Magistrate- Ranga Reddydist.} including the appearance of^{the Petitioners/RespondentNo' '1 to 5 pending} disposal of DVC;

¶22

This Petition coming on^{for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of} Grounds of criminal^{Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms PAGILLA} JAYANTHI ,Advocate^{for the Petitioner and sri Jithender RaoVeeramalla,Addl.} public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 4 and none appear for the Respondent Nos^{1 10 3}

¶23

The Court made the^{following ORDER:}

¶24

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADISRIDEVI

¶25

CRIMINAL PETITION No.1682 of 2O25

¶26

ORDER

¶27

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners-respondent Nos.1 to 5 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in D.V C.No.44 of 2024 pending on the file of the learned trial Court

¶28

Heard Sri Pagilla Jayanthi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State

¶29

Though this Criminal Petition is filed for quashing the proceedings, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has restricted his prayer to the extent of dispensing with the presence of the petitioners before the learned trial Court

¶30

Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing with the appearance of the petitioners-respondent Nos.'1 to 5 before the learned trial Court unless his presence is specifically required during the course of trial, subject to the condition of the petitioners-respondent Nos.1 to 5 being represented by their learned counsel on every date of hearing. ln case of non-appearance of the petitioners-respondent Nos.1 to 5 on the

¶31

¶32

specific date so fixed by the learned_trial Court for appearance, this

¶33

Order gets vacated automatically.

¶34

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall

¶35

stand closed

¶36

Sd/- V. KAVITHA ASSIS ANT REGISTRAR

/iTRUE COPY'

CTION OFFICER

To,

Vl AJCJ CUM Vl Addl. Judicial of First Class Magistrate- Ranga Reddy dist.

¶41

One CC to IMs. PAGILLA JAYANTHI Advocate [OPUC]

¶42

Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court at Hyderabad (OUT)

¶43

Two CD Copies

Y+'

HIGH COURT

DATED:06102t2025

ORDER

CRLP.No.1682 of 2025

..u S lar6 t^
(
a
d 1E APB zlffi
t
t
ESPATc

¶50

DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION

¶51

1cu{du w in#5

Uppu Mohan Krishna v. Uppu Lavanya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uppu Mohan Krishna v. Uppu Lavanya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ammala Bala Raju Vs The State of Telangana

Thangadpalli Vijay Kumar Vs State of Telangana

Dulam Sadanandam Vs The State of Telangana

A-3 Kotha Srisailam Vs The State of Telangana

Jasthi Rajesh Kumar, Vs State of Telengana

Harjot Singh, Vs State of Telangana