Petitioner sought pre-arrest bail in a brothel raid case. The Court noted an earlier interim order barring coercive steps and that major part of the investigation remained incomplete, and held the petitioner was not entitled to anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3385 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1632 OF 2025
Between:
Rayabaram vishnau, Sio. R.Srinivas, Age 32 years, Occ: Business, R/o H.No. 12-1040911 , Ramalagundu, Sitapal mandi Secunherbad, Telangana
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.2
AND
The State. of Telangana, by Public Prosecutor High Court, High Court Building, Hyderabad
... RESPONDENT/COMPLATNANT
Petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., praying that in the circumstances statdd in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the PetitioneriAccused No.2 on anticipatory bail in cri. No. 1007 of 2024 on the file of Panjagutta Police Station Hyderabad in the event of arrest.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri RAMDAS B, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the state of relangana on behalf of the Sole Respondent.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1632 of 2O2S
ORDER:
This Criminal petition is frled under Section 4g2 of the Bharatiya N'agarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, tor granting of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner/accused No.2 in Crime No. 10O7 of '.2024 on the file of the panjagutta potice tstation, Hyderabad.
=
2
srs,J Crl.P.No.1632 of 2025
registered uide Crirne No.1007 of 2024before the PanjaS'rtta Police, Hyderabad, forthe offences punishable under Sections t43, r44,25O,255,2s9,238,319(2),s9, r99,61(2) of the BNS and Sections 3 to 5of the PITA.
SKS,J Crl.P.No.1632 of2025
anticipatory L,ail to the petitioner, at this stage, does n,r ! arise. Hence, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shalt stand
closed
Sd/. A.V.S,PRASAD ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// 1 l, #CTIONOFFIC
To 1 The XIV Additional Chief Mekopolitan Magistrate.at Nampally' Hyderabad i,l[:zt$*tt;ffi;[i?:i":ll8?'larem'gi"#stt'3irsiansanaa'i Hvderabad(OUT) 4 iri,;"bdi;dRLnnuonsB, Advocate [oPUC]
pr
@;
',1
/
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2010212025
ORDER
jF- .rHE t4 14:
(
C {'(
I
11 w,l: 208
: ti
o-q., . -ii 11
CRLP.No.1632 ot 2025
DISMISSING THE CRL.PETITION
\r
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to accused No.2 in a brothel-house raid case when investigation is incomplete and coercive steps are already barred.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Rayabaram Vishnu
The State of Telangana
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
